Skip to content
Official portrait of Young Kim, U.S. Representative for California

U.S. Representative

Young Kim

California District 40

RepublicanModerate Conservative

Votes on Record

484

across 19 categories

Write Letter

Contact

202-225-4111Official Website

2439 Rayburn House Office Building Washington DC 20515-0540

Voting Profile

Legislative Record

484 votes analyzed

Most Active Policy Areas

#1 other#2 environment energy#3 budget#4 defense#5 healthcare

484

Votes Analyzed

Data sources: voteview, congress.gov

Political Position

Ideology Spectrum

0.26Moderate Conservative

Young Kim's NOMINATE score of 0.258 places her as a moderate conservative — noticeably to the left of the average House Republican score of 0.520. In practical terms, this means she votes with her party on most issues but is more willing than many of her Republican colleagues to break from the party line or support bipartisan legislation. Among House Republicans, she sits in the more centrist wing of the caucus.

LiberalModerateConservative
Republican avg

More liberal than the average Republican (0.52)

Data source: VoteView NOMINATE scores (UCLA/UC San Diego)

Policy Positions

Category Breakdown

484

total votes analyzed

Overview

Young Kim is a Republican member of the U.S. House of Representatives from California with 484 recorded votes. Her voting record reflects a center-right approach that blends traditional Republican priorities — such as support for tax legislation, law enforcement, and defense — with a willingness to cross party lines on select issues. On economic and fiscal matters, Kim has supported the majority of budget and tax bills that came to the floor, including the fiscal year 2027 budget resolution and continuing appropriations measures. She voted in favor of nearly all taxation bills presented, consistent with the Republican emphasis on tax policy. In the area of criminal justice, she voted yes on every bill in that category, signaling strong support for law enforcement and public safety legislation. Kim's record on healthcare shows more division: she voted yes on roughly 43% of healthcare-related bills, often voting against Democratic motions to recommit on major healthcare legislation while supporting procedural measures to advance Republican healthcare proposals. On environmental and energy policy, she supported 94% of the bills in that category, including measures to disapprove certain EPA regulations and water resources development legislation. Her record on labor issues stands out as the area where she most consistently voted no, opposing 80% of labor-related bills. On technology, banking, and criminal justice, she voted yes on every bill presented, while on defense and foreign policy she showed a more mixed pattern, supporting some measures while opposing others, including votes against War Powers resolutions related to Lebanon.

Key Positions

  • •Voted yes on all 13 criminal justice bills, indicating consistent support for law enforcement and public safety measures.
  • •Supported 94% of environment and energy bills, including votes to disapprove certain EPA regulations such as California harbor craft emission standards, and votes for the Water Resources Development Act and the Ratepayer Protection Act.
  • •Voted yes on 91% of taxation bills, reflecting strong alignment with Republican tax priorities.
  • •Opposed 80% of labor-related bills that came to a vote, suggesting disagreement with labor regulation proposals during this period.
  • •Voted against War Powers Resolution measures that would have directed the removal of U.S. Armed Forces from Lebanon, indicating support for maintaining the executive branch's flexibility on military deployments.
  • •Supported the fiscal year 2027 budget resolution and continuing appropriations, while voting against some specific spending measures such as an amendment related to North Atlantic right whale regulations.
  • •Voted yes on all 10 technology bills, showing consistent support for technology-related legislation.
  • •On healthcare, voted no on motions to recommit on the Do No Harm in Medicaid Act and the Lower Health Care Premiums for All Americans Act, while supporting procedural measures to advance those bills — a pattern consistent with backing the Republican versions of healthcare reform.

By Policy Area

Other276
75% yea1% other24% nay
Environment & Energy34
94% yea6% nay
Budget & Spending27
81% yea19% nay
Defense25
64% yea36% nay
Healthcare23
43% yea57% nay
Criminal Justice13
100% yea0% nay
Taxation11
91% yea9% nay
Foreign Policy11
36% yea64% nay
Education10
80% yea20% nay
Technology10
100% yea0% nay
Agriculture9
56% yea44% nay
Immigration8
63% yea38% nay
Housing8
88% yea13% nay
Infrastructure5
80% yea20% nay
Labor5
20% yea80% nay

Analysis updated: September 18, 2026

Campaign Finance

Follow the Money

Includes all authorized campaign committees (principal committee, joint fundraising, and other authorized committees). Outside spending by Super PACs and independent groups is shown separately below.

Verify on FEC.gov →

Career: $36.8M

Fundraising Over Time

Raised per election cycleSpent

Contribution Sources

Individual$5.5M

77%

PAC / Committees$1.6M

22%

Party Committee$10K

0%

Individual Breakdown

Itemized (>$200)

$3.5M

Small Dollar (<$200)

$2.0M

Donation Sizes

Under $200
$3.8M · 51%
$200 – 499
$230K · 3%
$500 – 999
$498K · 7%
$1,000 – 1,999
$684K · 9%
$2,000+
$2.2M · 30%

Share of individual contribution dollars by donation size, current election cycle.

Where the Money Comes From

In-state (CA)$2.1M · 38%
Out-of-state$3.4M · 62%

Itemized individual contributions only (donations over $200 report the donor's state). Small-dollar donations are not included because the FEC does not itemize them.

CA (home)
$2.1M
TX
$485K
FL
$454K
DC
$226K
NY
$210K
VA
$171K
IL
$128K
GA
$110K

Top Contributors

See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded

Top Contributing Industries

Top Donor Employers

RETIRED$2.3M
NULL$301K
SELF EMPLOYED$188K
HOMEMAKER$135K
ROUTE 66 SHOOTING SPORTS PARK$21K
BEST EFFORTS MADE$18K
BEJAC CORPORATION$17K
FOUNDERS FUND$14K
STARKEY HEARING TECHNOLOGIES$14K
STARLIGHT INDUSTRIES$14K
ELLIOTT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT$14K
HARVEST SMALL BUSINESS FINANCE$13K

Employer as self-reported by itemized donors. “Not Employed” and “Self-Employed” typically rank highest for small-dollar campaigns and include retirees.

Where the Money Goes

Spending by Purpose

Advertising
$3.6M
Other / Uncategorized
$3.5M
Administrative
$1.6M
Refunds
$142K
Fundraising
$70K
Materials
$3K
Travel
$1K

Purpose categories are self-reported on FEC filings; large “Other” totals are common.

Top Payees

1.

BARRELL PLACEMENTS

$3.3M
2.

TARGETED VICTORY LLC

$2.2M
3.

CALIBER CONTACT

$901K
4.

FULFILLMENT SOLUTIONS, INC.

$423K
5.

MDI IMAGING & MAIL

$220K
6.

CITI CARD

$168K
7.

WINRED TECHNICAL SERVICES

$163K
8.

PUBLIC OPINION STRATEGIES, LLC

$160K

Detailed Breakdown

Expenditures

Operating Costs

$8.6M

Operating Offsets

$20K

Net Operating

$8.6M

Refunds

Individual Refunds

$155K

Committee Refunds

$3K

Coverage: 1/1/2025 – 6/30/2026FEC: H8CA39240Updated: 8/12/2026Source: FEC.gov (all authorized committees)
Young Kim — U.S. Representative for California 40: Voting Record & Donors | True Vote