Skip to content
Official portrait of Tom McClintock, U.S. Representative for California

U.S. Representative

Tom McClintock

California District 5

RepublicanVery Conservative

Votes on Record

593

across 19 categories

Write Letter

Contact

202-225-2511Official Website

2256 Rayburn House Office Building Washington DC 20515-0505

Voting Profile

Legislative Record

593 votes analyzed

Most Active Policy Areas

#1 other#2 healthcare#3 environment energy#4 budget#5 defense

593

Votes Analyzed

Data sources: voteview, congress.gov

Political Position

Ideology Spectrum

0.67Very Conservative

Tom McClintock's NOMINATE ideology score of 0.670 places him well to the right of the average House Republican (0.520), making him one of the more conservative members of his party. In plain terms, he consistently favors limited government, reduced federal spending, and fewer regulations. Voters can expect him to take firmly conservative positions on most issues that come before the House.

LiberalModerateConservative
Republican avg

More conservative than the average Republican (0.52)

Data source: VoteView NOMINATE scores (UCLA/UC San Diego)

Policy Positions

Category Breakdown

593

total votes analyzed

Overview

Tom McClintock is a long-serving Republican representative from California whose voting record reflects a consistently conservative philosophy. With 593 recorded votes across a wide range of policy areas, he has established clear patterns: strong support for budget and appropriations measures aligned with fiscal restraint, frequent votes in favor of energy and environmental deregulation, and backing for tax-related legislation. He votes with his party on most procedural and substantive matters, though his opposition to certain defense bills — including the FY2027 National Defense Authorization Act — suggests he applies a fiscal or constitutional lens even to traditionally bipartisan areas like military spending. On healthcare, his record is notably split — voting in favor roughly half the time and against nearly as often. This pattern is consistent with a member who supports healthcare reform in principle but opposes expansions of federal healthcare programs. His votes against motions to recommit on Medicaid and health premium bills indicate he sided with Republican leadership positions on those measures. McClintock's foreign policy votes stand out: he voted against measures in this category more often than for them (27% yea), including a vote against a War Powers Resolution directing the removal of U.S. forces from Lebanon. On criminal justice, he voted in favor of every bill that came before him (13 of 13), and he supported technology-related legislation at a 90% rate. His labor votes skew toward opposition (33% yea), consistent with skepticism toward expanded federal labor protections. Overall, McClintock's record paints a picture of a legislator who prioritizes fiscal conservatism and limited government across nearly every policy domain, sometimes breaking from his own party when he views spending or federal authority as excessive.

Key Positions

  • •Voted YEA on all 13 criminal justice bills that came before him, showing consistent support for law-enforcement and justice-related legislation.
  • •Voted NAY on the FY2027 National Defense Authorization Act and the Take Care of America's Veterans Act, suggesting fiscal or policy objections even on defense and veterans' matters that typically receive broad Republican support.
  • •Voted YEA on a resolution disapproving an EPA rule granting California authority over nonroad engine pollution standards, reflecting opposition to state-level environmental regulations that go beyond federal standards.
  • •Supported budget and appropriations measures at an 81% rate, including the FY2027 congressional budget resolution and continuing appropriations for FY2027.
  • •Voted NAY on a War Powers Resolution to remove U.S. forces from Lebanon, siding with those who opposed congressional direction to withdraw troops.
  • •Voted against labor-related bills more often than for them (33% yea), consistent with opposition to expanded federal workplace regulations.
  • •Voted NAY on the sole reproductive rights measure in his record.
  • •Supported technology legislation at a 90% rate (9 of 10 votes), indicating consistent backing for tech-related policy.

By Policy Area

Other281
67% yea3% other30% nay
Healthcare94
52% yea48% nay
Environment & Energy35
80% yea3% other17% nay
Budget & Spending32
81% yea6% other13% nay
Defense31
61% yea4% other35% nay
Agriculture20
55% yea45% nay
Taxation13
77% yea23% nay
Criminal Justice13
100% yea0% nay
Education11
73% yea27% nay
Foreign Policy11
27% yea9% other64% nay
Technology10
90% yea10% nay
Housing9
56% yea11% other33% nay
Immigration8
63% yea38% nay
Banking & Finance7
71% yea29% nay
Labor6
33% yea67% nay
Social Security5
60% yea40% nay
Infrastructure5
80% yea20% nay

Analysis updated: September 18, 2026

Campaign Finance

Follow the Money

Includes all authorized campaign committees (principal committee, joint fundraising, and other authorized committees). Outside spending by Super PACs and independent groups is shown separately below.

Verify on FEC.gov →

Career: $17.0M

Fundraising Over Time

Raised per election cycleSpent

Contribution Sources

Individual$770K

83%

PAC / Committees$157K

17%

Individual Breakdown

Itemized (>$200)

$658K

Small Dollar (<$200)

$112K

Donation Sizes

Under $200
$147K · 19%
$200 – 499
$47K · 6%
$500 – 999
$67K · 9%
$1,000 – 1,999
$143K · 19%
$2,000+
$368K · 48%

Share of individual contribution dollars by donation size, current election cycle.

Where the Money Comes From

In-state (CA)$591K · 90%
Out-of-state$69K · 10%

Itemized individual contributions only (donations over $200 report the donor's state). Small-dollar donations are not included because the FEC does not itemize them.

CA (home)
$591K
VA
$10K
TN
$8K
NV
$8K
FL
$7K
DC
$6K
TX
$4K
MD
$3K

Top Contributors

See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded

Top Contributing Industries

Top Donor Employers

NONE$219K
SELF EMPLOYED$68K
NOT PROVIDED$12K
SOVEREIGN NATION$12K
NULL$11K
TECHNICAL MAINTENANCE SUPPORT, INC.$7K
AKT DEVELOPMENT$7K
CEN-CAL FIRE SYSTEMS, INC.$7K
CROWN ASSOCIATES REALTY, INC.$7K
AKT INVESTMENTS INC.$7K
SH SMITH FARMS$7K
SENSORIO$7K

Employer as self-reported by itemized donors. “Not Employed” and “Self-Employed” typically rank highest for small-dollar campaigns and include retirees.

Where the Money Goes

Spending by Purpose

Other / Uncategorized
$702K
Administrative
$110K
Fundraising
$29K
Materials
$19K
Contributions
$7K
Travel
$4K

Purpose categories are self-reported on FEC filings; large “Other” totals are common.

Top Payees

1.

TRAILHEAD STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS

$165K
2.

HUEY, JON MR.

$145K
3.

MONACO, INC./THE MONACO GROUP

$69K
4.

INTERNAL REVENUE SVC.

$63K
5.

GEORGE, CHARLA

$62K
6.

EDH WATERFRONT LLC

$60K
7.

CHASE CARD SERVICES

$28K
8.

THE TOWNSEND GROUP

$27K

Detailed Breakdown

Expenditures

Operating Costs

$839K

Operating Offsets

$2K

Net Operating

$836K

Refunds

Individual Refunds

$374

Outside Spending (Super PACs)

Supporting

$101K

Opposing

$2.4M

Total Outside Spending

$2.5M

Top Outside Spenders

01

DEMOCRATIC CONGRESSIONAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE

-$804K
$804K
02

RED TO BLUE CA

-$386K
$386K
03

HOUSE MAJORITY PAC

-$335K
$335K
04

CALIFORNIA MODERATE VOICES

-$259K
$259K
05

SIERRA CLUB

-$222K
$222K
06

PLANNED PARENTHOOD ADVOCATES MAR MONTE

-$128K
$128K
07

PROTECT OUR WINTERS ACTION FUND

-$115K
$115K
08

SIERRA CLUB POLITICAL COMMITTEE

-$100K
$100K

Independent expenditures are made without coordination with the candidate. Source: FEC Schedule E filings.

Coverage: 1/1/2025 – 6/30/2026FEC: H8CA04152Updated: 8/12/2026Source: FEC.gov (all authorized committees)