Skip to content
Official portrait of Scott H. Peters, U.S. Representative for California

U.S. Representative

Scott H. Peters

California District 50

DemocratModerate Liberal

Votes on Record

544

across 19 categories

Write Letter

Contact

202-225-0508Official Website

2369 Rayburn House Office Building Washington DC 20515-0550

Voting Profile

Legislative Record

544 votes analyzed

Most Active Policy Areas

#1 other#2 healthcare#3 environment energy#4 defense#5 budget

544

Votes Analyzed

Data sources: voteview, congress.gov

Political Position

Ideology Spectrum

-0.19Moderate Liberal

Scott Peters holds a NOMINATE ideology score of -0.193, placing him in the moderate-liberal range. Compared to the average House Democrat score of approximately -0.380, Peters votes notably closer to the political center, making him one of the more centrist members of his party. This means he aligns with his party on many issues but is more likely than the typical Democrat to break with his party or support bipartisan measures.

LiberalModerateConservative
Democrat avg

More conservative than the average Democrat (-0.38)

Data source: VoteView NOMINATE scores (UCLA/UC San Diego)

Policy Positions

Category Breakdown

544

total votes analyzed

Overview

Scott Peters is a Democratic U.S. Representative from California with 544 recorded votes spanning a wide range of policy areas. His voting record reflects a centrist-leaning Democrat who consistently supports his party on labor, foreign policy, and civil rights issues while showing more independent tendencies on budget, environment and energy, and banking matters. Peters has been most active on healthcare (64 votes), environment and energy (34 votes), defense (32 votes), and budget (30 votes). His healthcare voting shows majority support at 56%, while his budget voting stands out with only 20% yea votes, suggesting he frequently opposes budget proposals—likely those put forward by the majority party. On defense, he has supported roughly 69% of measures, indicating a relatively supportive posture toward military and veterans' legislation. His foreign policy record is notable for unanimous support across all 11 recorded votes, and he has voted yea on all five labor-related measures. On immigration, his votes are evenly split, reflecting what may be a case-by-case approach to specific proposals rather than a consistent pattern in either direction. His environment and energy voting (32% yea) and banking and finance voting (20% yea) show frequent opposition to proposals in those areas, which likely reflects disagreement with majority-party-led bills rather than opposition to those policy areas broadly.

Key Positions

  • •Voted yea on all 11 foreign policy measures on record, showing consistent support for international engagement and diplomacy-related legislation.
  • •Supported all five labor-related votes, indicating reliable backing for worker-focused legislation.
  • •Opposed 80% of budget measures (24 nay out of 30 votes), including voting against the fiscal year 2027 congressional budget resolution and continuing appropriations.
  • •Voted in favor of veterans' legislation, including the Take Care of America's Veterans Act, and supported a War Powers Resolution measure directing the removal of U.S. forces from hostilities in Lebanon.
  • •On healthcare, supported motions to recommit on the Do No Harm in Medicaid Act and the Lower Health Care Premiums for All Americans Act, while opposing procedural measures that bundled multiple health-related bills.
  • •Voted nay on a measure disapproving California's commercial harbor craft emissions regulations, consistent with supporting state-level environmental standards.
  • •Supported the Water Resources Development Act, reflecting backing for water infrastructure investment.
  • •Voted in favor of 70% of technology-related measures, suggesting general support for technology policy initiatives.

By Policy Area

Other279
67% yea2% other31% nay
Healthcare64
56% yea6% other38% nay
Environment & Energy34
32% yea9% other59% nay
Defense32
69% yea6% other25% nay
Budget & Spending30
20% yea80% nay
Criminal Justice13
46% yea8% other46% nay
Taxation12
58% yea9% other33% nay
Agriculture11
36% yea9% other55% nay
Foreign Policy11
100% yea0% nay
Education10
60% yea10% other30% nay
Technology10
70% yea30% nay
Housing9
44% yea56% nay
Immigration8
50% yea50% nay
Banking & Finance5
20% yea80% nay
Labor5
100% yea0% nay
Infrastructure5
60% yea40% nay

Analysis updated: September 18, 2026

Campaign Finance

Follow the Money

Includes all authorized campaign committees (principal committee, joint fundraising, and other authorized committees). Outside spending by Super PACs and independent groups is shown separately below.

Verify on FEC.gov →

Career: $23.8M

Fundraising Over Time

Raised per election cycleSpent

Contribution Sources

Individual$336K

24%

PAC / Committees$1.1M

76%

Self-Funded$2K

0%

Individual Breakdown

Itemized (>$200)

$320K

Small Dollar (<$200)

$16K

Donation Sizes

Under $200
$26K · 4%
$200 – 499
$10K · 2%
$500 – 999
$62K · 9%
$1,000 – 1,999
$129K · 19%
$2,000+
$445K · 66%

Share of individual contribution dollars by donation size, current election cycle.

Where the Money Comes From

In-state (CA)$437K · 67%
Out-of-state$219K · 33%

Itemized individual contributions only (donations over $200 report the donor's state). Small-dollar donations are not included because the FEC does not itemize them.

CA (home)
$437K
DC
$40K
MA
$38K
VA
$34K
NY
$21K
TX
$19K
CO
$12K
CT
$11K

Top Contributors

See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded

Top Contributing Industries

Top Donor Employers

N/A$244K
SELF-EMPLOYED$27K
RA CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LP$18K
ARNOLD VENTURES$14K
NULL$14K
GENERAL ATOMICS$14K
ROBBINS GELLER$8K
ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP$8K
ENDEAVOR BIOMEDICINES$8K
SEAN N PARKER FOUNDATION$7K
KLEINER PERKINS$7K
INVESTMENT ASSOCIATE$7K

Employer as self-reported by itemized donors. “Not Employed” and “Self-Employed” typically rank highest for small-dollar campaigns and include retirees.

Where the Money Goes

Spending by Purpose

Other / Uncategorized
$705K
Contributions
$366K
Materials
$128K
Administrative
$110K
Transfers
$35K
Fundraising
$12K
Refunds
$3K
Advertising
$1K

Purpose categories are self-reported on FEC filings; large “Other” totals are common.

Top Payees

1.

DCCC

$278K
2.

MOLLY ALLEN ASSOCIATES LLC

$193K
3.

SAN DIEGO COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY

$121K
4.

CAPITAL STRATEGIES

$97K
5.

GUSTO

$67K
6.

TRUONG, JASMINE

$67K
7.

BLUE WAVE POLITICAL PARTNERS

$62K
8.

ALG POLLING, INC. DBA IMPACT RESEARCH INC.

$48K

Detailed Breakdown

Expenditures

Operating Costs

$894K

Operating Offsets

$10K

Net Operating

$884K

Refunds

Individual Refunds

$4K

Committee Refunds

$1K

Outside Spending (Super PACs)

Supporting

$720K

Opposing

$13.1M

Total Outside Spending

$13.9M

Top Outside Spenders

01

NRCC

-$9.5M
$9.5M
02

AMERICANS FOR TAX REFORM

-$2.8M
$2.8M
03

CONGRESSIONAL LEADERSHIP FUND

-$513K
$513K
04

AMERICAN HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION PAC

+$250K
$250K
05

JOBS OPPORTUNITY AND FREEDOM POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE - JOFPAC

-$199K
$199K
06

VETERANS AID PAC INC

+$150K
$150K
07

PROGRESSIVE KICK INDEPENDENT EXPENDITURES

-$110K
$110K
08

CENTER FORWARD COMMITTEE

+$101K
$101K

Independent expenditures are made without coordination with the candidate. Source: FEC Schedule E filings.

Coverage: 1/1/2025 – 6/30/2026FEC: H2CA52089Updated: 8/12/2026Source: FEC.gov (all authorized committees)
Scott H. Peters — U.S. Representative for California 50: Voting Record & Donors | True Vote