Skip to content
Official portrait of Robert Garcia, U.S. Representative for California

U.S. Representative

Robert Garcia

California District 42

DemocratProgressive

Votes on Record

463

across 19 categories

Write Letter

Contact

202-225-7924Official Website

109 Cannon House Office Building Washington DC 20515-0542

Voting Profile

Legislative Record

463 votes analyzed

Most Active Policy Areas

#1 other#2 environment energy#3 defense#4 budget#5 criminal justice

463

Votes Analyzed

Data sources: voteview, congress.gov

Political Position

Ideology Spectrum

-0.38Progressive

Robert Garcia's ideology score of -0.376 places him very close to the Democratic Party average of -0.380, making him a mainstream Democrat. In plain language, he generally supports progressive policies but sits almost exactly at the center of his party rather than on its left or right wing. Voters can think of him as a fairly typical Democrat in terms of how he votes on the House floor.

LiberalModerateConservative
Democrat avg

Near the average for Democrats (-0.38)

Data source: VoteView NOMINATE scores (UCLA/UC San Diego)

Policy Positions

Category Breakdown

463

total votes analyzed

Overview

Robert Garcia is a Democratic member of the U.S. House of Representatives from California with 463 recorded votes. His voting record spans a wide range of policy areas, with the largest clusters in environment and energy, defense, and budget matters. He consistently votes with his party on most issues, placing him squarely within the Democratic mainstream. On foreign policy, Garcia has been one of the most active supporters of engagement, voting yea on over 90% of foreign policy measures that came to the floor. He has also shown strong support for defense-related legislation, including veterans' care and War Powers Resolution measures aimed at congressional oversight of military deployments. On labor issues, he has voted in favor of worker-related measures in 80% of his recorded votes in that category. Garcia has opposed most budget resolutions brought to the floor, voting nay on 21 of 24 budget-related measures, which is consistent with Democratic opposition to Republican-led budget proposals. Similarly, he voted against most environment and energy measures (21 nay votes out of 34), though he did support some bipartisan measures like the Water Resources Development Act. On immigration and housing, he has more frequently voted nay, reflecting opposition to bills that did not align with his party's positions on those topics. His record on healthcare, education, and technology shows a more mixed pattern, with votes split relatively evenly between yea and nay. This likely reflects the range of bills in these categories, where some proposals drew bipartisan support while others were more partisan in nature.

Key Positions

  • •Strongly supports foreign policy engagement, voting yea on 10 of 11 foreign policy measures — one of his most consistent voting areas.
  • •Consistently opposes Republican-led budget proposals, voting nay on 21 of 24 budget-related measures, including the fiscal year 2027 budget resolution and continuing appropriations.
  • •Supports congressional oversight of military deployments, voting yea on War Powers Resolution measures to address U.S. Armed Forces involvement in Lebanon.
  • •Voted to protect California's authority to set its own emission standards, opposing a congressional disapproval resolution targeting EPA rules on California harbor craft regulations.
  • •Supports labor-related legislation, voting yea on 4 of 5 labor measures that came to the floor.
  • •Voted yea on the Water Resources Development Act and the Ratepayer Protection Act, showing willingness to support some bipartisan environment and energy measures.
  • •Voted nay on the fiscal year 2027 budget resolution (July 2026), opposing the majority party's spending framework.
  • •Supports veterans' legislation, voting yea on the Take Care of America's Veterans Act.

By Policy Area

Other275
55% yea8% other37% nay
Environment & Energy34
32% yea6% other62% nay
Defense25
68% yea4% other28% nay
Budget & Spending24
13% yea88% nay
Criminal Justice13
31% yea15% other54% nay
Taxation11
55% yea18% other27% nay
Foreign Policy11
91% yea9% nay
Technology10
40% yea30% other30% nay
Healthcare9
56% yea44% nay
Education9
56% yea44% nay
Agriculture8
63% yea38% nay
Immigration8
38% yea63% nay
Housing8
25% yea12% other63% nay
Infrastructure5
20% yea20% other60% nay
Labor5
80% yea20% nay

Analysis updated: September 18, 2026

Campaign Finance

Follow the Money

Includes all authorized campaign committees (principal committee, joint fundraising, and other authorized committees). Outside spending by Super PACs and independent groups is shown separately below.

Verify on FEC.gov →

Career: $5.7M

Fundraising Over Time

Raised per election cycleSpent

Contribution Sources

Individual$2.0M

76%

PAC / Committees$626K

24%

Individual Breakdown

Itemized (>$200)

$849K

Small Dollar (<$200)

$1.1M

Donation Sizes

Under $200
$1.3M · 66%
$200 – 499
$95K · 5%
$500 – 999
$113K · 6%
$1,000 – 1,999
$132K · 7%
$2,000+
$336K · 17%

Share of individual contribution dollars by donation size, current election cycle.

Where the Money Comes From

In-state (CA)$523K · 62%
Out-of-state$326K · 38%

Itemized individual contributions only (donations over $200 report the donor's state). Small-dollar donations are not included because the FEC does not itemize them.

CA (home)
$523K
DC
$75K
NY
$41K
VA
$29K
FL
$29K
MD
$27K
PA
$16K
TX
$13K

Top Contributors

See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded

Top Contributing Industries

Top Donor Employers

NOT EMPLOYED$278K
SELF-EMPLOYED$102K
NULL$20K
BLACKSTONE$17K
INVARIANT$16K
TRANSDIGM GROUP$11K
AILO LOGISTICS$9K
MCARTHURGLEN$8K
FULCRUM PUBLIC AFFAIRS$8K
BIG E PIZZA$7K
TOWNSEND PUBLIC AFFAIRS$7K
WASSERMAN$7K

Employer as self-reported by itemized donors. “Not Employed” and “Self-Employed” typically rank highest for small-dollar campaigns and include retirees.

Where the Money Goes

Spending by Purpose

Other / Uncategorized
$1.2M
Contributions
$231K
Fundraising
$88K
Travel
$71K
Refunds
$14K
Administrative
$10K
Advertising
$5K

Purpose categories are self-reported on FEC filings; large “Other” totals are common.

Top Payees

1.

DIGITAL STRATEGY GROUP

$508K
2.

DCCC

$200K
3.

ROLLA GROUP LLC

$136K
4.

ACTBLUE TECHNICAL SERVICES

$73K
5.

SEGMENT INSIGHT LLC

$59K
6.

MIDDLE SEAT CONSULTING LLC

$57K
7.

GUSTO

$50K
8.

DEMOCRATIC CONGRESSIONAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE

$50K

Detailed Breakdown

Expenditures

Operating Costs

$1.3M

Operating Offsets

$18K

Net Operating

$1.3M

Refunds

Individual Refunds

$2K

Committee Refunds

$12K

Outside Spending (Super PACs)

Supporting

$3.7M

Opposing

$0

Total Outside Spending

$3.7M

Top Outside Spenders

01

PROTECT OUR FUTURE PAC

+$2.9M
$2.9M
02

WEB3 FORWARD

+$463K
$463K
03

CALIFORNIANS FOR SAFE AND HEALTHY COMMUNITIES

+$209K
$209K
04

CHC BOLD PAC

+$158K
$158K
05

COURAGE CALIFORNIA SUPER PAC

+$846.65
$846.65
06

PLANNED PARENTHOOD ADVOCACY PROJECT LOS ANGELES COUNTY ACTION FUND

+$203.81
$203.81
07

SIERRA CLUB INDEPENDENT ACTION

+$20
$20

Independent expenditures are made without coordination with the candidate. Source: FEC Schedule E filings.

Coverage: 1/1/2025 – 6/30/2026FEC: H2CA47188Updated: 8/12/2026Source: FEC.gov (all authorized committees)
Robert Garcia — U.S. Representative for California 42: Voting Record & Donors | True Vote