Skip to content
Official portrait of Ro Khanna, U.S. Representative for California

U.S. Representative

Ro Khanna

California District 17

DemocratProgressive

Votes on Record

510

across 19 categories

Write Letter

Contact

202-225-2631Official Website

306 Cannon House Office Building Washington DC 20515-0517

Voting Profile

Legislative Record

510 votes analyzed

Most Active Policy Areas

#1 other#2 healthcare#3 environment energy#4 budget#5 defense

510

Votes Analyzed

Data sources: voteview, congress.gov

Political Position

Ideology Spectrum

-0.46Progressive

Ro Khanna holds a NOMINATE ideology score of -0.457, placing him to the left of the average House Democrat (approximately -0.380). In practical terms, this means he tends to take more progressive positions than many members of his own party. He represents a solidly liberal perspective, consistently aligning with the left wing of the Democratic caucus on most policy matters.

LiberalModerateConservative
Democrat avg

Near the average for Democrats (-0.38)

Data source: VoteView NOMINATE scores (UCLA/UC San Diego)

Policy Positions

Category Breakdown

510

total votes analyzed

Overview

Ro Khanna is a Democratic member of the U.S. House of Representatives from California with 510 recorded votes in the dataset. His voting record reflects a consistently progressive approach across most major policy areas. He frequently supports healthcare legislation, foreign policy measures, and taxation bills, while regularly opposing budget proposals, housing-related bills, and banking and finance measures that have come to the floor — a pattern consistent with disagreement with the policy direction of those particular bills rather than opposition to the topic itself. On defense and national security, Khanna shows a nuanced record. He voted in favor of the Take Care of America's Veterans Act and supported a War Powers Resolution directing the removal of U.S. forces from hostilities in Lebanon, while voting against the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2027. This suggests he differentiates between supporting military personnel and questioning broader military authorization and spending. In the areas of environment and energy, Khanna voted against a congressional disapproval resolution that would have overturned an EPA rule related to California pollution control standards, indicating support for environmental regulations. His overall 35.3% yea rate in this category largely reflects opposition to bills that would roll back environmental protections. On technology — a notable area given his Silicon Valley district — his votes are evenly split at 50%, suggesting he evaluates tech-related legislation on a case-by-case basis. Khanna's record on healthcare shows strong support, with a 69.2% yea rate and recent votes backing motions related to Medicaid protections and lowering health care premiums. His single recorded vote on reproductive rights was a yea, and he has supported education and labor-related measures at rates above 60%.

Key Positions

  • •Supports healthcare access legislation, voting yea on 69.2% of healthcare bills including motions related to Medicaid protections and lowering health insurance premiums.
  • •Opposes rollbacks of environmental regulations — voted against a resolution that would have disapproved an EPA rule on California pollution control standards for harbor craft (September 2026).
  • •Voted against the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2027, but voted in favor of the Take Care of America's Veterans Act, reflecting a distinction between military spending authorization and veteran support.
  • •Supported a War Powers Resolution to direct the removal of U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities in Lebanon (June 2026), indicating support for congressional oversight of military engagements.
  • •Opposed the fiscal year 2027 congressional budget resolution and continuing appropriations, voting nay on both — consistent with disagreement on spending priorities in those proposals.
  • •Shows a case-by-case approach to technology legislation, splitting votes evenly at 50% in that category — a notable pattern given his representation of a major technology hub in Silicon Valley.
  • •Frequently opposes immigration-related bills brought to the floor, voting yea on only 37.5% of those measures.

By Policy Area

Other278
60% yea3% other37% nay
Healthcare39
69% yea31% nay
Environment & Energy34
35% yea3% other62% nay
Budget & Spending28
25% yea75% nay
Defense28
61% yea3% other36% nay
Criminal Justice13
31% yea15% other54% nay
Education11
64% yea36% nay
Taxation11
73% yea27% nay
Foreign Policy11
82% yea18% nay
Agriculture10
60% yea40% nay
Technology10
50% yea10% other40% nay
Housing8
25% yea75% nay
Immigration8
38% yea63% nay
Social Security5
60% yea40% nay
Infrastructure5
60% yea40% nay
Labor5
60% yea20% other20% nay

Analysis updated: September 18, 2026

Campaign Finance

Follow the Money

Includes all authorized campaign committees (principal committee, joint fundraising, and other authorized committees). Outside spending by Super PACs and independent groups is shown separately below.

Verify on FEC.gov →

Career: $45.7M

Fundraising Over Time

Raised per election cycleSpent

Contribution Sources

Individual$12.7M

100%

PAC / Committees$1K

0%

Individual Breakdown

Itemized (>$200)

$11.1M

Small Dollar (<$200)

$1.7M

Donation Sizes

Under $200
$2.0M · 15%
$200 – 499
$162K · 1%
$500 – 999
$271K · 2%
$1,000 – 1,999
$941K · 7%
$2,000+
$9.5M · 74%

Share of individual contribution dollars by donation size, current election cycle.

Where the Money Comes From

In-state (CA)$6.6M · 59%
Out-of-state$4.6M · 41%

Itemized individual contributions only (donations over $200 report the donor's state). Small-dollar donations are not included because the FEC does not itemize them.

CA (home)
$6.6M
NY
$1.4M
IL
$683K
TX
$292K
WA
$282K
MA
$252K
NJ
$212K
FL
$192K

Top Contributors

See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded

Top Contributing Industries

Top Donor Employers

NOT EMPLOYED$2.9M
SELF-EMPLOYED$1.0M
NULL$148K
GOOGLE$139K
KKR$138K
DRAGONEER INVESTMENT GROUP$35K
STANFORD UNIVERSITY$35K
APPLE$32K
META$31K
ERNST & YOUNG LLP$28K
SV ANGEL$28K
Y COMBINATOR$27K

Employer as self-reported by itemized donors. “Not Employed” and “Self-Employed” typically rank highest for small-dollar campaigns and include retirees.

Where the Money Goes

Spending by Purpose

Other / Uncategorized
$6.3M
Advertising
$388K
Administrative
$247K
Refunds
$153K
Transfers
$146K
Contributions
$144K
Fundraising
$73K
Materials
$22K

Purpose categories are self-reported on FEC filings; large “Other” totals are common.

Top Payees

1.

ADP PAYROLL SERVICES

$1.3M
2.

SAPPHIRE STRATEGIES

$1.2M
3.

ERIKSON COMMUNICATION GROUP, INC

$350K
4.

FIRST DATA MERCHANT SERVICES

$339K
5.

DCCC

$270K
6.

MIDDLE SEAT

$181K
7.

UNITED AIRLINES, INC.

$179K
8.

MELTED SOLIDS

$175K

Detailed Breakdown

Expenditures

Operating Costs

$6.9M

Operating Offsets

$360K

Net Operating

$6.6M

Refunds

Individual Refunds

$281K

Committee Refunds

$500

Outside Spending (Super PACs)

Supporting

$989K

Opposing

$172K

Total Outside Spending

$1.2M

Top Outside Spenders

01

CALIFORNIANS FOR INNOVATION

+$745K
$745K
02

PROTECT PROGRESS

+$217K
$217K
03

WORKING FOR US POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE INC

-$168K
$168K
04

OHLONE AREA UNITED DEMOCRATIC CAMPAIGN

+$13K
$13K
05

HE'S GOTTA GO PAC

+$2K-$5K
$6K
06

UNITED POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION

+$6K
$6K
07

COURAGE CALIFORNIA SUPER PAC

+$2K
$2K
08

READY FOR REFORM.COM SPONSORED BY DEPUTY SHERIFFS' ASSOCIATION OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY

+$2K
$2K

Independent expenditures are made without coordination with the candidate. Source: FEC Schedule E filings.

Coverage: 1/1/2025 – 6/30/2026FEC: H4CA12055Updated: 8/12/2026Source: FEC.gov (all authorized committees)