Skip to content

Voting Profile

Legislative Record

703 votes analyzed

Most Active Policy Areas

#1 other#2 healthcare#3 environment energy#4 defense#5 foreign policy

703

Votes Analyzed

Data sources: voteview, congress.gov

Political Position

Ideology Spectrum

-0.43Progressive

Senator Richard Blumenthal is a progressive Democrat who votes to the left of the average member of his party. His NOMINATE ideology score of -0.435 places him noticeably more liberal than the Democratic Party average of -0.380, meaning he consistently favors expanding government programs, strengthening regulations, and supporting social safety net policies more often than a typical Democrat.

LiberalModerateConservative
Democrat avg

Near the average for Democrats (-0.38)

Data source: VoteView NOMINATE scores (UCLA/UC San Diego)

Policy Positions

Category Breakdown

703

total votes analyzed

Overview

Senator Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut has compiled a substantial voting record of 703 votes in the U.S. Senate. His record reflects consistent alignment with progressive policy priorities across healthcare, environmental protection, and social spending, while frequently opposing measures backed by the Republican majority. On healthcare, Blumenthal has supported efforts to lower out-of-pocket costs and maintain federal oversight of Medicare programs, while opposing nominees he viewed as insufficiently committed to public health mandates. On defense and foreign policy, he has backed congressional authority over military engagements — notably voting to require congressional authorization for military action involving Iran — while opposing certain defense authorization bills and executive branch nominees. Blumenthal's voting pattern on environment and energy issues shows strong support for maintaining environmental regulations, including rules governing chemical reporting requirements like PFAS standards. On fiscal matters including budgets and taxation, his votes reflect support for progressive tax policies and opposition to spending packages that he viewed as insufficiently protective of social programs. Across nearly all categories, Blumenthal's high rate of 'Nay' votes reflects his position as a member of the minority party during a period when the Senate majority advanced legislation and nominations he frequently opposed. This is a common pattern for senators in the minority and should be understood in that context rather than as an indication of obstructionism.

Key Positions

  • •Voted to require congressional authorization before military action against Iran, supporting legislation to remove U.S. Armed Forces from unauthorized hostilities (July 2026).
  • •Supported maintaining PFAS chemical reporting and recordkeeping requirements by voting to disapprove the EPA's rule weakening those standards (August 2026).
  • •Voted in favor of a measure to create a point of order against budget reconciliation bills that do not lower out-of-pocket healthcare costs (April 2026).
  • •Supported congressional disapproval of changes to the Medicare prior authorization WISeR Model, voting to preserve existing patient protections (July 2026).
  • •Consistently opposed executive branch nominees across multiple departments, reflecting disagreement with the current administration's policy direction.
  • •Voted in favor of trade-related measures in a majority of opportunities (4 of 6 votes), suggesting relative openness to international trade agreements.
  • •Supported housing-related legislation at a notably higher rate than most other categories, splitting evenly with 6 'Yea' and 6 'Nay' votes out of 12.

By Policy Area

Other231
10% yea2% other88% nay
Healthcare83
57% yea2% other41% nay
Environment & Energy81
21% yea79% nay
Defense67
51% yea49% nay
Foreign Policy54
2% yea2% other96% nay
Budget & Spending46
22% yea78% nay
Immigration27
22% yea78% nay
Taxation24
50% yea4% other46% nay
Banking & Finance19
32% yea68% nay
Education13
23% yea77% nay
Infrastructure13
31% yea69% nay
Housing12
50% yea50% nay
Agriculture9
0% yea100% nay
Social Security7
29% yea14% other57% nay
Trade6
67% yea33% nay
Labor5
20% yea80% nay

Analysis updated: September 18, 2026

Campaign Finance

Follow the Money

Includes all authorized campaign committees (principal committee, joint fundraising, and other authorized committees). Outside spending by Super PACs and independent groups is shown separately below.

Verify on FEC.gov →

Career: $28.1M

Fundraising Over Time

Raised per election cycleSpent

Contribution Sources

Individual$416K

70%

PAC / Committees$177K

30%

Individual Breakdown

Itemized (>$200)

$273K

Small Dollar (<$200)

$142K

Donation Sizes

Under $200
$112K · 24%
$200 – 499
$8K · 2%
$500 – 999
$16K · 3%
$1,000 – 1,999
$65K · 14%
$2,000+
$267K · 57%

Share of individual contribution dollars by donation size, current election cycle.

Where the Money Comes From

In-state (CT)$149K · 39%
Out-of-state$231K · 61%

Itemized individual contributions only (donations over $200 report the donor's state). Small-dollar donations are not included because the FEC does not itemize them.

CT (home)
$149K
DC
$45K
CA
$38K
VA
$38K
MD
$30K
FL
$18K
MA
$16K
WA
$13K

Top Contributors

See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded

Top Contributing Industries

Top Donor Employers

NOT EMPLOYED$122K
SELF-EMPLOYED$41K
ANTHROPIC$18K
ANTHROPIC PBC$14K
MACHINE INTELLIGENCE RESEARCH INST.$8K
COOK PINE CAPITAL LLC$7K
SKADDEN ARPS$7K
AMPHENOL CORP$7K
ADOBE$7K
GRANITE TELECOM$7K
AURORA INNOVATION$7K
CRESSON MANAGEMENT$5K

Employer as self-reported by itemized donors. “Not Employed” and “Self-Employed” typically rank highest for small-dollar campaigns and include retirees.

Where the Money Goes

Spending by Purpose

Other / Uncategorized
$355K
Fundraising
$8K
Refunds
$6K
Administrative
$3K
Materials
$752.07

Purpose categories are self-reported on FEC filings; large “Other” totals are common.

Top Payees

1.

NGP VAN, INC.

$90K
2.

ANNE LEWIS STRATEGIES DBA MISSION WIRED

$63K
3.

MLT STRATEGIC FUNDRAISING, LLC

$46K
4.

REINOSO-CASTELLANO, JENNY

$45K
5.

ADP, LLC

$30K
6.

WEBSTER BANK

$24K
7.

UNITED STATES TREASURY

$17K
8.

CAPITOL COMPLIANCE ASSOCIATES, INC.

$14K

Detailed Breakdown

Expenditures

Operating Costs

$758K

Operating Offsets

$26K

Net Operating

$732K

Refunds

Individual Refunds

$6K

Committee Refunds

$6K

Outside Spending (Super PACs)

Supporting

$127K

Opposing

$6.8M

Total Outside Spending

$6.9M

Top Outside Spenders

01

CONNECTICUT PATRIOTS PAC

-$5.7M
$5.7M
02

RESTORATION PAC

-$450K
$450K
03

LEADERSHIP NOW

-$446K
$446K
04

NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA POLITICAL VICTORY FUND

+$3K-$159K
$162K
05

NATIONAL COMMITTEE TO PRESERVE SOCIAL SECURITY & MEDICARE PAC

+$102K
$102K
06

NATIONAL RIGHT TO LIFE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE

-$29K
$29K
07

FRONTIERS OF FREEDOM ACTION, INC.

-$16K
$16K
08

PLANNED PARENTHOOD ACTION FUND INC

+$13K
$13K

Independent expenditures are made without coordination with the candidate. Source: FEC Schedule E filings.

Coverage: 1/1/2023 – 6/30/2026FEC: S0CT00177Updated: 8/12/2026Source: FEC.gov (all authorized committees)
Richard Blumenthal — U.S. Senator for Connecticut: Voting Record & Donors | True Vote