Skip to content
Official portrait of Pete Aguilar, U.S. Representative for California

U.S. Representative

Pete Aguilar

California District 33

DemocratProgressive

Votes on Record

525

across 19 categories

Write Letter

Contact

202-225-3201Official Website

108 Cannon House Office Building Washington DC 20515-0533

Voting Profile

Legislative Record

525 votes analyzed

Most Active Policy Areas

#1 other#2 healthcare#3 environment energy#4 defense#5 budget

525

Votes Analyzed

Data sources: voteview, congress.gov

Political Position

Ideology Spectrum

-0.33Progressive

Pete Aguilar's NOMINATE score of -0.325 places him in the progressive range of the political spectrum, though he sits slightly closer to the center than the average House Democrat (whose score is approximately -0.380). In practical terms, he generally votes with his party on most issues but has occasionally broken from the Democratic mainstream, making him one of the more moderate members of the Democratic caucus. This positioning is consistent with his role in House Democratic leadership, where building broad coalitions within the party is part of the job.

LiberalModerateConservative
Democrat avg

Near the average for Democrats (-0.38)

Data source: VoteView NOMINATE scores (UCLA/UC San Diego)

Policy Positions

Category Breakdown

525

total votes analyzed

Overview

Pete Aguilar is a Democratic member of the U.S. House of Representatives from California with a substantial voting record of 525 recorded votes. His voting patterns show consistent alignment with Democratic priorities on healthcare, labor, education, and foreign policy, while his overall ideology score suggests he occupies a position slightly more centrist than the typical House Democrat. Across policy areas, Aguilar has voted in favor of healthcare-related legislation about two-thirds of the time, supported labor measures at a high rate, and backed foreign policy bills in nearly all instances. He has voted against most budget resolutions brought to the floor, which is common for minority-party members opposing the majority's spending framework. On immigration and housing, his lower yes-vote percentages reflect opposition to bills brought forward by the Republican majority rather than opposition to action in those areas generally. His record on environment and energy legislation shows a mix of positions — he supported some measures like the Water Resources Development Act and the Ratepayer Protection Act while opposing others, including a resolution to disapprove California-specific environmental regulations. On defense, he supported veterans' legislation and a War Powers Resolution measure while voting against the fiscal year 2027 National Defense Authorization Act. Aguilar's voting patterns are broadly representative of a mainstream Democrat who occasionally departs from the party's most progressive wing, particularly on issues where pragmatic or coalition-building considerations come into play.

Key Positions

  • •Voted in favor of healthcare access legislation, including supporting motions related to the Do No Harm in Medicaid Act and the Lower Health Care Premiums for All Americans Act in December 2025.
  • •Opposed the fiscal year 2027 budget resolution and continuing appropriations bill in July 2026, consistent with minority-party opposition to the majority's spending priorities.
  • •Voted against a congressional disapproval resolution targeting California's harbor craft emission standards, supporting his home state's authority to set its own environmental regulations.
  • •Supported the War Powers Resolution directing the removal of U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities in Lebanon, reflecting a position favoring congressional oversight of military engagements.
  • •Backed the Take Care of America's Veterans Act in July 2026, while voting against the broader National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2027.
  • •Voted in favor of foreign policy measures at the highest rate of any category (90.9%), indicating consistent support for international engagement legislation.
  • •Supported labor-related legislation in 4 out of 5 recorded votes, one of his strongest category alignments.
  • •Voted in favor of technology-related measures 70% of the time, consistent with representing a California district where tech policy carries particular relevance.

By Policy Area

Other279
65% yea1% other34% nay
Healthcare51
67% yea33% nay
Environment & Energy34
35% yea65% nay
Defense31
65% yea3% other32% nay
Budget & Spending28
18% yea82% nay
Criminal Justice13
46% yea16% other38% nay
Education11
64% yea36% nay
Taxation11
73% yea27% nay
Foreign Policy11
91% yea9% nay
Agriculture10
60% yea40% nay
Technology10
70% yea30% nay
Immigration8
25% yea75% nay
Housing8
38% yea63% nay
Infrastructure5
60% yea40% nay
Labor5
80% yea20% nay

Analysis updated: September 18, 2026

Campaign Finance

Follow the Money

Includes all authorized campaign committees (principal committee, joint fundraising, and other authorized committees). Outside spending by Super PACs and independent groups is shown separately below.

Verify on FEC.gov →

Career: $24.8M

Fundraising Over Time

Raised per election cycleSpent

Contribution Sources

Individual$1.9M

48%

PAC / Committees$2.1M

52%

Individual Breakdown

Itemized (>$200)

$1.6M

Small Dollar (<$200)

$260K

Donation Sizes

Under $200
$321K · 13%
$200 – 499
$70K · 3%
$500 – 999
$168K · 7%
$1,000 – 1,999
$357K · 15%
$2,000+
$1.5M · 62%

Share of individual contribution dollars by donation size, current election cycle.

Where the Money Comes From

In-state (CA)$956K · 44%
Out-of-state$1.2M · 56%

Itemized individual contributions only (donations over $200 report the donor's state). Small-dollar donations are not included because the FEC does not itemize them.

CA (home)
$956K
NY
$232K
DC
$174K
MD
$104K
TX
$81K
VA
$76K
FL
$70K
NC
$70K

Top Contributors

See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded

Top Contributing Industries

Top Donor Employers

NOT EMPLOYED$208K
RETIRED$151K
SELF$95K
NULL$70K
SELF EMPLOYED$56K
NONE$45K
ESRI$16K
JORDAN REAL ESTATE$14K
APOLLO GLOBAL MANAGEMENT$14K
ANDREESSEN HOROWITZ$14K
GENTEX CORPORATION$14K
BGR GROUP$13K

Employer as self-reported by itemized donors. “Not Employed” and “Self-Employed” typically rank highest for small-dollar campaigns and include retirees.

Where the Money Goes

Spending by Purpose

Contributions
$1.7M
Other / Uncategorized
$1.4M
Administrative
$438K
Materials
$297K
Fundraising
$82K
Travel
$10K
Advertising
$5K
Refunds
$1K

Purpose categories are self-reported on FEC filings; large “Other” totals are common.

Top Payees

1.

DCCC

$1.2M
2.

AMERICAN EXPRESS

$516K
3.

ANGERHOLZER BROZ CONSULTING LLC

$293K
4.

RYAN MULCAHY

$193K
5.

MOMENTUM CAMPAIGNS

$175K
6.

YES ON 50, ELECTION RIGGING RESPONSE ACT

$100K
7.

MSL STRATEGIES

$72K
8.

GOLF, REDD

$69K

Detailed Breakdown

Expenditures

Operating Costs

$2.0M

Operating Offsets

$22K

Net Operating

$2.0M

Refunds

Individual Refunds

$18K

Committee Refunds

$18K

Outside Spending (Super PACs)

Supporting

$1.1M

Opposing

$88K

Total Outside Spending

$1.1M

Top Outside Spenders

01

CULAC THE PAC OF CREDIT UNION NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

+$347K
$347K
02

LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS VICTORY FUND

+$319K
$319K
03

RESTORING OUR COMMUNITY

+$264K
$264K
04

COOPERATIVE OF AMERICAN PHYSICIANS INDEPENDENT EXPENDITURE COMMITTEE

+$91K
$91K
05

WOMEN VOTE!

-$88K
$88K
06

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SAFETY EMPLOYEES' BENEFIT ASSOCIATION LOCAL PAC

+$25K
$25K
07

DEMOCRATIC CONGRESSIONAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE

+$4K
$4K
08

HUMANE SOCIETY LEGISLATIVE FUND

+$2K
$2K

Independent expenditures are made without coordination with the candidate. Source: FEC Schedule E filings.

Coverage: 1/1/2025 – 6/30/2026FEC: H2CA31125Updated: 8/12/2026Source: FEC.gov (all authorized committees)
Pete Aguilar — U.S. Representative for California 33: Voting Record & Donors | True Vote