Skip to content
Official portrait of Nanette Diaz Barragán, U.S. Representative for California

U.S. Representative

Nanette Diaz Barragán

California District 44

DemocratProgressive

Votes on Record

510

across 19 categories

Write Letter

Contact

202-225-8220Official Website

2312 Rayburn House Office Building Washington DC 20515-0544

Voting Profile

Legislative Record

510 votes analyzed

Most Active Policy Areas

#1 other#2 healthcare#3 environment energy#4 budget#5 defense

510

Votes Analyzed

Data sources: voteview, congress.gov

Political Position

Ideology Spectrum

-0.50Progressive

Rep. Nanette Diaz Barragán's NOMINATE ideology score of -0.501 places her notably to the left of the average House Democrat (approximately -0.380). In plain language, this means she votes more consistently with progressive positions than most members of her own party. She represents the more liberal wing of the Democratic caucus, though she is not at the furthest end of the spectrum.

LiberalModerateConservative
Democrat avg

More liberal than the average Democrat (-0.38)

Data source: VoteView NOMINATE scores (UCLA/UC San Diego)

Policy Positions

Category Breakdown

510

total votes analyzed

Overview

Nanette Diaz Barragán is a Democratic U.S. Representative from California with a solidly progressive voting record across 510 recorded votes. Her positions align closely with the left wing of her party, particularly on environmental regulation, budget priorities, and immigration policy, where she has consistently opposed Republican-led measures. On healthcare, she has supported efforts to protect Medicaid and lower health insurance premiums, voting in favor of related motions and against procedural moves she viewed as limiting debate on those bills. In the budget and appropriations space, she has voted against most recent spending frameworks and continuing resolutions put forward by the majority, suggesting disagreement with the spending priorities or policy riders attached to those bills. Her defense votes show a more mixed pattern — she supported veterans' care legislation and a War Powers Resolution to limit military involvement in Lebanon, but voted against the FY2027 National Defense Authorization Act. On environmental and energy issues, she opposed a congressional disapproval of California's harbor craft emission standards and supported water resources and ratepayer protection legislation. Across labor, education, foreign policy, and social security, her voting record reflects consistent support for Democratic policy priorities, though with a smaller number of recorded votes in those areas.

Key Positions

  • •Voted to protect California's authority to set its own emission standards for commercial harbor craft, opposing a congressional resolution that would have overridden the state's environmental regulations (September 2026).
  • •Voted against the FY2027 National Defense Authorization Act while supporting a separate War Powers Resolution to withdraw U.S. forces from hostilities in Lebanon, indicating selective support for military measures.
  • •Consistently opposed recent budget resolutions and continuing appropriations bills — voting Nay on the FY2027 budget framework and related spending measures, suggesting disagreement with the majority's fiscal priorities.
  • •Supported healthcare access measures including the Do No Harm in Medicaid Act motion to recommit and the Lower Health Care Premiums for All Americans Act.
  • •Voted in favor of the Take Care of America's Veterans Act, showing cross-issue support for veterans' services even while opposing broader defense authorization.
  • •Opposed most immigration-related measures that came to a vote, with only 2 Yea votes out of 8 total immigration votes recorded.
  • •Supported labor-related legislation in 4 out of 5 recorded votes, one of her most consistent category patterns.
  • •Voted Yea on 10 of 11 foreign policy measures, indicating broad support for international engagement legislation.

By Policy Area

Other278
59% yea3% other38% nay
Healthcare39
69% yea31% nay
Environment & Energy34
35% yea6% other59% nay
Budget & Spending28
18% yea82% nay
Defense28
54% yea10% other36% nay
Criminal Justice13
31% yea7% other62% nay
Education11
64% yea36% nay
Taxation11
64% yea36% nay
Foreign Policy11
91% yea9% nay
Agriculture10
60% yea40% nay
Technology10
60% yea10% other30% nay
Immigration8
25% yea75% nay
Housing8
25% yea75% nay
Social Security5
60% yea40% nay
Infrastructure5
60% yea40% nay
Labor5
80% yea20% nay

Analysis updated: September 18, 2026

Campaign Finance

Follow the Money

Includes all authorized campaign committees (principal committee, joint fundraising, and other authorized committees). Outside spending by Super PACs and independent groups is shown separately below.

Verify on FEC.gov →

Career: $7.9M

Fundraising Over Time

Raised per election cycleSpent

Contribution Sources

Individual$171K

22%

PAC / Committees$607K

78%

Individual Breakdown

Itemized (>$200)

$167K

Small Dollar (<$200)

$4K

Donation Sizes

Under $200
$7K · 4%
$200 – 499
$2K · 1%
$500 – 999
$21K · 12%
$1,000 – 1,999
$55K · 32%
$2,000+
$86K · 50%

Share of individual contribution dollars by donation size, current election cycle.

Where the Money Comes From

In-state (CA)$81K · 48%
Out-of-state$86K · 52%

Itemized individual contributions only (donations over $200 report the donor's state). Small-dollar donations are not included because the FEC does not itemize them.

CA (home)
$81K
DC
$47K
TX
$14K
OR
$7K
MD
$7K
FL
$5K
VA
$3K
RI
$3K

Top Contributors

See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded

Top Contributing Industries

Top Donor Employers

NOT EMPLOYED$34K
SELF EMPLOYED$9K
SARES REGIS GROUP$7K
SEAN N PARKER FOUNDATION$7K
AIRMAN SERVICES INC.$7K
BUCHANAN INGERSOLL & ROONEY$7K
THEGROUP$7K
KHAIL A. PARRIS APLC$5K
PARRIS LAW$5K
THE WILLIAMS GROUP$4K
EMPIRE CONSULTING GROUP$4K
D VASQUEZ LAW$4K

Employer as self-reported by itemized donors. “Not Employed” and “Self-Employed” typically rank highest for small-dollar campaigns and include retirees.

Where the Money Goes

Spending by Purpose

Other / Uncategorized
$1.1M
Administrative
$43K
Contributions
$33K
Materials
$14K
Travel
$10K
Fundraising
$4K

Purpose categories are self-reported on FEC filings; large “Other” totals are common.

Top Payees

1.

CITI CARD

$828K
2.

ANGERHOLZER BROZ CONSULTING

$63K
3.

BARRAGAN, NANETTE

$47K
4.

NGP VAN, INC.

$38K
5.

BLUE WAVE POLITICAL PARTNERS, LLC

$26K
6.

COUNCIL ON LEGAL EDUCATION OPPORTUNITY INC.

$25K
7.

HM CONSULTING

$20K
8.

DERNOGA, MATTHEW

$20K

Detailed Breakdown

Expenditures

Operating Costs

$1.1M

Operating Offsets

$6K

Net Operating

$1.1M

Refunds

Individual Refunds

$100

Outside Spending (Super PACs)

Supporting

$1.1M

Opposing

$27K

Total Outside Spending

$1.1M

Top Outside Spenders

01

WOMEN VOTE!

+$738K
$738K
02

AMERICA UNITED

+$250K
$250K
03

CLIMATE HAWKS VOTE POLITICAL ACTION

+$38K
$38K
04

CALIFORNIA PROGRESS COALITION

-$27K
$27K
05

LATINO VICTORY FUND

+$23K
$23K
06

COURAGE CALIFORNIA SUPER PAC

+$2K
$2K
07

TOGETHER WE THRIVE

+$750
$750
08

PLANNED PARENTHOOD ADVOCACY PROJECT LOS ANGELES COUNTY ACTION FUND

+$597.48
$597.48

Independent expenditures are made without coordination with the candidate. Source: FEC Schedule E filings.

Coverage: 1/1/2025 – 6/30/2026FEC: H6CA44103Updated: 8/12/2026Source: FEC.gov (all authorized committees)
Nanette Diaz Barragán — U.S. Representative for California 44: Voting Record & Donors | True Vote