Skip to content
Official portrait of Maxine Waters, U.S. Representative for California

U.S. Representative

Maxine Waters

California District 43

DemocratVery Progressive

Votes on Record

766

across 19 categories

Write Letter

Contact

202-225-2201Official Website

2221 Rayburn House Office Building Washington DC 20515-0543

Voting Profile

Legislative Record

766 votes analyzed

Most Active Policy Areas

#1 other#2 healthcare#3 budget#4 agriculture#5 defense

766

Votes Analyzed

Data sources: voteview, congress.gov

Political Position

Ideology Spectrum

-0.66Very Progressive

Rep. Maxine Waters holds a NOMINATE ideology score of -0.656, which places her well to the left of the average House Democrat (approximately -0.38). In plain terms, she is among the more progressive members of her party, consistently supporting liberal policy positions across most issue areas. Her voting record reflects a strongly left-of-center approach to legislation, particularly on economic, social, and regulatory matters.

LiberalModerateConservative
Democrat avg

More liberal than the average Democrat (-0.38)

Data source: VoteView NOMINATE scores (UCLA/UC San Diego)

Policy Positions

Category Breakdown

766

total votes analyzed

Overview

Maxine Waters is a long-serving Democratic member of the U.S. House of Representatives from California. Her voting record across 766 recorded votes shows a consistent pattern of supporting expanded government involvement in healthcare, consumer financial protections, and social programs, while opposing measures she views as reducing federal oversight or cutting spending on domestic priorities. Healthcare is one of her most active legislative areas, with 170 votes cast and a 61.2% rate of voting in favor of healthcare-related measures. She has generally supported legislation aimed at expanding access to coverage and preserving Medicaid protections. On budget matters, her 42% yea rate reflects frequent opposition to Republican-led spending proposals and continuing resolutions, including voting against the fiscal year 2027 budget resolution and related continuing appropriations. On defense and foreign policy, Waters has shown a willingness to support veterans' legislation while also advocating for congressional oversight of military operations abroad, as seen in her votes for War Powers Resolution measures regarding U.S. forces in Lebanon. In the areas of environment and energy, her low 31.4% yea rate suggests she frequently opposes bills in this category, which in the current Congress often involve measures to expand energy production or roll back environmental regulations. Waters is notably active on financial regulation issues, consistent with her long tenure on the House Financial Services Committee. Her voting patterns on banking and finance, combined with her support for the National Fraud Enforcement Division Act, point to an emphasis on consumer protection and financial oversight.

Key Positions

  • •Consistently supports healthcare access legislation, casting 170 votes in the healthcare category with a 61.2% yea rate, and voted in favor of motions related to the Lower Health Care Premiums for All Americans Act.
  • •Frequently opposes Republican-led budget proposals, voting against both the fiscal year 2027 budget resolution and a continuing appropriations measure in July 2026.
  • •Supports congressional oversight of military deployments, voting yea on multiple War Powers Resolution measures to remove U.S. forces from Lebanon.
  • •Backs veterans' services, voting yea on the Take Care of America's Veterans Act in July 2026.
  • •Supports stronger financial fraud enforcement, voting yea on the National Fraud Enforcement Division Act in September 2026.
  • •Opposes most immigration-related legislation brought to the floor, with only a 12.5% yea rate across 8 immigration votes, suggesting opposition to restrictive immigration measures.
  • •Frequently votes against environment and energy bills in the current Congress, with a 31.4% yea rate, a pattern consistent with opposing measures that would reduce environmental regulations or expand fossil fuel production.
  • •Supports labor-related legislation at a 66.7% rate, indicating alignment with worker protection and labor rights measures.

By Policy Area

Other285
60% yea5% other35% nay
Healthcare170
61% yea6% other33% nay
Budget & Spending81
42% yea5% other53% nay
Agriculture44
52% yea14% other34% nay
Defense39
72% yea5% other23% nay
Environment & Energy35
31% yea6% other63% nay
Education14
57% yea43% nay
Taxation14
50% yea7% other43% nay
Criminal Justice13
31% yea7% other62% nay
Foreign Policy11
82% yea18% nay
Banking & Finance10
40% yea60% nay
Technology10
40% yea20% other40% nay
Housing9
44% yea56% nay
Social Security8
50% yea12% other38% nay
Immigration8
13% yea88% nay
Infrastructure7
57% yea43% nay
Labor6
67% yea33% nay

Analysis updated: September 18, 2026

Campaign Finance

Follow the Money

Includes all authorized campaign committees (principal committee, joint fundraising, and other authorized committees). Outside spending by Super PACs and independent groups is shown separately below.

Verify on FEC.gov →

Career: $14.7M

Fundraising Over Time

Raised per election cycleSpent

Contribution Sources

Individual$339K

46%

PAC / Committees$401K

54%

Individual Breakdown

Itemized (>$200)

$318K

Small Dollar (<$200)

$20K

Donation Sizes

Under $200
$24K · 7%
$200 – 499
$4K · 1%
$500 – 999
$15K · 4%
$1,000 – 1,999
$80K · 24%
$2,000+
$214K · 63%

Share of individual contribution dollars by donation size, current election cycle.

Where the Money Comes From

In-state (CA)$185K · 58%
Out-of-state$132K · 42%

Itemized individual contributions only (donations over $200 report the donor's state). Small-dollar donations are not included because the FEC does not itemize them.

CA (home)
$185K
DC
$31K
TX
$17K
MD
$16K
NY
$13K
GA
$12K
FL
$12K
IL
$7K

Top Contributors

See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded

Top Contributing Industries

Top Donor Employers

NONE$43K
SELF EMPLOYED$20K
MINDSET$15K
ALLEN MEDIA GROUP$12K
BLACKROCK$12K
NOT EMPLOYED$10K
G & C EQUIPMENT$7K
ARIEL INVESTMENTS$7K
EREBOR BANK$7K
TIMOTHY PRYZBYLSKI$7K
YUCAIPA COMPANIES$7K
ICO$5K

Employer as self-reported by itemized donors. “Not Employed” and “Self-Employed” typically rank highest for small-dollar campaigns and include retirees.

Where the Money Goes

Spending by Purpose

Other / Uncategorized
$416K
Contributions
$100K
Administrative
$96K
Advertising
$78K
Fundraising
$11K
Materials
$4K
Refunds
$4K

Purpose categories are self-reported on FEC filings; large “Other” totals are common.

Top Payees

1.

MARINA GRAPHIC CENTER

$193K
2.

DEMOCRATIC CONGRESSIONAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE

$100K
3.

BIRD MARELLA

$80K
4.

GOULD & ORELLANA, LLC

$78K
5.

U.S. TREASURY

$68K
6.

CALIFORNIA BANK & TRUST

$28K
7.

AT&T

$20K
8.

SAVVY COMMUNICATIONS

$19K

Detailed Breakdown

Expenditures

Operating Costs

$489K

Net Operating

$489K

Refunds

Individual Refunds

$4K

Outside Spending (Super PACs)

Supporting

$85K

Opposing

$1.4M

Total Outside Spending

$1.5M

Top Outside Spenders

01

FUTURE45

-$899K
$899K
02

VIGOP (VIRGIN ISLANDS REPUBLICAN PARTY)

-$321K
$321K
03

STARS AND STRIPES FOREVER PAC

-$211K
$211K
04

LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEMOCRATIC CENTRAL COMMITTEE

+$63K
$63K
05

ELBERT GUILLORY'S AMERICA

+$10K-$8K
$18K
06

PROTECTING OUR VOTE PAC

+$13K
$13K
07

GREAT AMERICA PAC

-$10K
$10K

Independent expenditures are made without coordination with the candidate. Source: FEC Schedule E filings.

Coverage: 1/1/2025 – 6/30/2026FEC: H4CA23011Updated: 8/12/2026Source: FEC.gov (all authorized committees)