Skip to content
Official portrait of Mark Takano, U.S. Representative for California

U.S. Representative

Mark Takano

California District 39

DemocratProgressive

Votes on Record

544

across 19 categories

Write Letter

Contact

202-225-2305Official Website

2078 Rayburn House Office Building Washington DC 20515-0539

Voting Profile

Legislative Record

544 votes analyzed

Most Active Policy Areas

#1 other#2 healthcare#3 environment energy#4 defense#5 budget

544

Votes Analyzed

Data sources: voteview, congress.gov

Political Position

Ideology Spectrum

-0.46Progressive

Mark Takano's NOMINATE score of -0.456 places him to the left of the average House Democrat (approximately -0.380). In plain terms, he votes consistently with progressive positions and is more liberal than most members of his own party. On the ideological spectrum used by political scientists, where -1 is the most liberal and +1 is the most conservative, his score reflects a firmly progressive voting pattern.

LiberalModerateConservative
Democrat avg

Near the average for Democrats (-0.38)

Data source: VoteView NOMINATE scores (UCLA/UC San Diego)

Policy Positions

Category Breakdown

544

total votes analyzed

Overview

Mark Takano is a Democratic U.S. Representative from California whose voting record reflects consistently progressive positions across most policy areas. With 544 recorded votes, he has built a substantial record that leans more liberal than the typical House Democrat, particularly on budget and fiscal issues, environmental regulation, and immigration. On defense and veterans' affairs, Takano has shown strong support for veterans-related legislation, voting in favor of measures like the Take Care of America's Veterans Act. He has also voted to invoke the War Powers Resolution to limit U.S. military involvement in Lebanon, reflecting a pattern of supporting congressional oversight of military operations. In healthcare, he has supported efforts to protect Medicaid and lower health insurance premiums. His budget votes show a clear pattern of opposing Republican-led spending frameworks, with only 5 of 30 budget-related votes cast as 'yea.' On environmental and energy policy, he has opposed measures that would roll back environmental regulations, such as voting against congressional disapproval of EPA rules on California engine pollution standards. He supported the Water Resources Development Act and the Ratepayer Protection Act. In labor, foreign policy, and taxation, Takano tends to vote with his party. He supported 4 out of 5 labor-related bills, 10 out of 11 foreign policy measures, and 8 out of 12 taxation bills. His record on immigration shows frequent opposition to bills that reached the floor, voting 'nay' on 6 out of 8 immigration-related measures, consistent with his party's positions on immigration legislation brought forward by the majority.

Key Positions

  • •Consistently supports veterans' legislation, including voting for the Take Care of America's Veterans Act and measures related to veterans' health and benefits.
  • •Voted multiple times to invoke the War Powers Resolution regarding U.S. military involvement in Lebanon, supporting congressional authority over military deployments.
  • •Opposed the fiscal year 2027 budget resolution and continuing appropriations, reflecting disagreement with the majority party's spending priorities.
  • •Supported healthcare access measures, including voting for motions related to the Do No Harm in Medicaid Act and the Lower Health Care Premiums for All Americans Act.
  • •Opposed congressional efforts to disapprove EPA environmental regulations, including rules on California engine pollution standards.
  • •Voted in favor of the vast majority of foreign policy measures that came to the floor, supporting 10 out of 11 such bills.
  • •Supported labor-related legislation in 4 out of 5 votes, placing him among stronger advocates for worker protections.
  • •Opposed most immigration bills that reached a vote, casting 'nay' on 6 out of 8 measures in this category.

By Policy Area

Other279
61% yea1% other38% nay
Healthcare64
61% yea1% other38% nay
Environment & Energy34
35% yea65% nay
Defense32
72% yea28% nay
Budget & Spending30
17% yea83% nay
Criminal Justice13
31% yea69% nay
Taxation12
67% yea8% other25% nay
Agriculture11
45% yea55% nay
Foreign Policy11
91% yea9% nay
Education10
60% yea10% other30% nay
Technology10
60% yea40% nay
Housing9
44% yea56% nay
Immigration8
25% yea75% nay
Banking & Finance5
20% yea80% nay
Infrastructure5
60% yea40% nay
Labor5
80% yea20% nay

Analysis updated: September 18, 2026

Campaign Finance

Follow the Money

Includes all authorized campaign committees (principal committee, joint fundraising, and other authorized committees). Outside spending by Super PACs and independent groups is shown separately below.

Verify on FEC.gov →

Career: $10.2M

Fundraising Over Time

Raised per election cycleSpent

Contribution Sources

Individual$478K

54%

PAC / Committees$405K

46%

Individual Breakdown

Itemized (>$200)

$371K

Small Dollar (<$200)

$107K

Donation Sizes

Under $200
$133K · 28%
$200 – 499
$17K · 4%
$500 – 999
$35K · 7%
$1,000 – 1,999
$61K · 13%
$2,000+
$236K · 49%

Share of individual contribution dollars by donation size, current election cycle.

Where the Money Comes From

In-state (CA)$266K · 71%
Out-of-state$109K · 29%

Itemized individual contributions only (donations over $200 report the donor's state). Small-dollar donations are not included because the FEC does not itemize them.

CA (home)
$266K
NY
$30K
DC
$22K
FL
$14K
HI
$13K
MO
$12K
MD
$3K
NM
$3K

Top Contributors

See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded

Top Contributing Industries

Top Donor Employers

N/A$69K
SELF-EMPLOYED$58K
RETIRED$19K
KELLER ANDERLE SCOLNICK LLP$14K
NOT EMPLOYED$10K
NULL$10K
COLANTUONO, HIGHSMITH & WHATLEY, PC$7K
VETERANS UNITED HOME LOANS$7K
WARNER BROTHERS$7K
NEW PACIFIC REALTY CORP.$7K
WELLS FARGO$7K
BROOKHILL CORP.$7K

Employer as self-reported by itemized donors. “Not Employed” and “Self-Employed” typically rank highest for small-dollar campaigns and include retirees.

Where the Money Goes

Spending by Purpose

Other / Uncategorized
$802K
Transfers
$100K
Contributions
$33K
Refunds
$19K
Fundraising
$18K
Travel
$3K
Materials
$2K
Administrative
$508.75

Purpose categories are self-reported on FEC filings; large “Other” totals are common.

Top Payees

1.

VAN NESS CREATIVE STRATEGIES

$222K
2.

GUSTO

$191K
3.

AMERICAN EXPRESS

$100K
4.

DEMOCRATIC CONGRESSIONAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE (DCCC)

$100K
5.

ROLLA GROUP LLC

$89K
6.

MOMENTUM CAMPAIGNS LLC

$39K
7.

RISING BLUE CONSULTING

$30K
8.

PAPERCLIP CONSULTING INC.

$26K

Detailed Breakdown

Expenditures

Operating Costs

$819K

Operating Offsets

$2K

Net Operating

$817K

Transfers

Transfers Out

$100K

Refunds

Individual Refunds

$19K

Outside Spending (Super PACs)

Supporting

$520K

Opposing

$440K

Total Outside Spending

$960K

Top Outside Spenders

01

US CHAMBER OF COMMERCE

-$440K
$440K
02

EQUALITY PROJECT PAC

+$282K
$282K
03

CALIFORNIANS FOR SACRED SITES PROTECTION

+$144K
$144K
04

NATIONAL NURSES UNITED FOR PATIENT PROTECTION

+$70K
$70K
05

PLANNED PARENTHOOD ACTION FUND OF THE PACIFIC SOUTHWEST PAC

+$11K
$11K
06

PLANNED PARENTHOOD ACTION FUND OF THE PACIFIC SOUTHWEST

+$6K
$6K
07

PROTECTING OUR VOTE PAC

+$2K
$2K
08

COURAGE CALIFORNIA SUPER PAC

+$2K
$2K

Independent expenditures are made without coordination with the candidate. Source: FEC Schedule E filings.

Coverage: 1/1/2025 – 6/30/2026FEC: H2CA43245Updated: 8/12/2026Source: FEC.gov (all authorized committees)