Skip to content

Voting Profile

Legislative Record

615 votes analyzed

Most Active Policy Areas

#1 other#2 environment energy#3 defense#4 foreign policy#5 budget

615

Votes Analyzed

Data sources: voteview, congress.gov

Political Position

Ideology Spectrum

-0.26Moderate Liberal

Senator Mark Kelly's voting record places him as a moderate liberal within the Democratic Party. His ideology score of -0.263 is closer to the political center than the average Democrat in the Senate (approximately -0.380), meaning he is one of the more conservative-leaning members of his party. This positioning is consistent with representing Arizona, a competitive state where senators often adopt centrist approaches on certain issues.

LiberalModerateConservative
Democrat avg

More conservative than the average Democrat (-0.38)

Data source: VoteView NOMINATE scores (UCLA/UC San Diego)

Policy Positions

Category Breakdown

615

total votes analyzed

Overview

Mark Kelly has compiled a substantial voting record of 615 votes in the U.S. Senate, reflecting a profile that blends traditional Democratic priorities with notable independence on defense and national security matters. His strongest area of support is in defense policy, where he voted in favor of measures nearly 68% of the time — a rate that stands out among his policy areas and aligns with his background as a former Navy combat pilot and NASA astronaut. He has also shown consistent support for infrastructure and trade legislation. On economic issues, Kelly's record shows a selective approach. He supported measures aimed at consumer costs — such as reserve funds addressing grocery prices and hedge fund impacts on housing — while opposing a number of broader budget proposals. In healthcare, his votes are closely split, suggesting he evaluates health-related legislation on a case-by-case basis rather than following a strictly partisan pattern. Kelly has voted against the majority of executive branch nominations that came before the Senate in recent sessions, consistent with broader opposition-party voting patterns on confirmations. On environmental and energy policy, he supported some regulatory oversight measures, including a resolution related to PFAS chemical reporting requirements. His immigration votes show a mixed pattern, with support for roughly one in four measures in that category. Overall, Kelly's record reflects a senator who generally aligns with his party but demonstrates independence in areas such as defense, trade, and infrastructure, consistent with his position as one of the more centrist Democrats in the chamber.

Key Positions

  • •Voted in favor of defense-related measures at a high rate (67.9%), including supporting resolutions requiring congressional authorization for military action against Iran.
  • •Supported infrastructure legislation in a majority of votes (63.6%), indicating consistent backing for federal investment in physical infrastructure.
  • •Voted in favor of a resolution to withhold senators' pay during a government shutdown, signaling support for congressional accountability during budget impasses.
  • •Supported deficit-neutral reserve funds related to the impact of hedge fund ownership on single-family home prices and grocery costs, reflecting attention to consumer affordability issues.
  • •Voted to approve a resolution regarding PFAS chemical reporting requirements under the Toxic Substances Control Act, supporting regulatory oversight of certain industrial chemicals.
  • •Opposed the majority of executive branch and judicial nominations that reached the Senate floor, consistent with opposition-party patterns on confirmation votes.
  • •Supported trade-related measures in most votes (66.7% of 6 votes), suggesting openness to international trade agreements.
  • •Voted in favor of all technology-related measures that came to a vote (3 of 3), though the small sample size limits broader conclusions.

By Policy Area

Other223
18% yea7% other75% nay
Environment & Energy71
25% yea7% other68% nay
Defense56
68% yea2% other30% nay
Foreign Policy55
16% yea4% other80% nay
Budget & Spending44
30% yea2% other68% nay
Healthcare35
51% yea3% other46% nay
Immigration26
27% yea11% other62% nay
Taxation24
54% yea4% other42% nay
Banking & Finance15
20% yea7% other73% nay
Housing12
42% yea16% other42% nay
Education11
9% yea9% other82% nay
Infrastructure11
64% yea36% nay
Agriculture9
11% yea22% other67% nay
Trade6
67% yea16% other17% nay
Social Security5
20% yea40% other40% nay

Analysis updated: September 18, 2026

Campaign Finance

Follow the Money

Includes all authorized campaign committees (principal committee, joint fundraising, and other authorized committees). Outside spending by Super PACs and independent groups is shown separately below.

Verify on FEC.gov →

Career: $245.5M

Fundraising Over Time

Raised per election cycleSpent

Contribution Sources

Individual$98.2M

99%

PAC / Committees$837K

1%

Individual Breakdown

Itemized (>$200)

$50.9M

Small Dollar (<$200)

$47.3M

Donation Sizes

Under $200
$33.5M · 83%
$200 – 499
$2.4M · 6%
$500 – 999
$1.8M · 5%
$1,000 – 1,999
$1.5M · 4%
$2,000+
$1.2M · 3%

Share of individual contribution dollars by donation size, current election cycle.

Where the Money Comes From

In-state (AZ)$2.9M · 21%
Out-of-state$11.1M · 79%

Itemized individual contributions only (donations over $200 report the donor's state). Small-dollar donations are not included because the FEC does not itemize them.

AZ (home)
$2.9M
CA
$2.4M
NY
$745K
TX
$719K
FL
$607K
WA
$554K
MA
$538K
IL
$385K

Top Contributors

See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded

Top Contributing Industries

Top Donor Employers

NOT EMPLOYED$9.6M
SELF EMPLOYED$871K
RETIRED$230K
SELF$19K
HERITAGE CAPITAL CORPORATION$14K
MASS GENERAL HOSPITAL$14K
REGLAGENE, INC.$14K
THE WONDERFUL COMPANY$13K
UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA$13K
NULL$12K
GOOGLE$12K
FLAGSHIP PIONEERING$11K

Employer as self-reported by itemized donors. “Not Employed” and “Self-Employed” typically rank highest for small-dollar campaigns and include retirees.

Where the Money Goes

Spending by Purpose

Other / Uncategorized
$16.6M
Fundraising
$3.2M
Transfers
$375K
Advertising
$231K
Refunds
$222K
Contributions
$131K
Administrative
$13K
Travel
$2K

Purpose categories are self-reported on FEC filings; large “Other” totals are common.

Top Payees

1.

AISLE 518 STRATEGIES, LLC

$11.1M
2.

A.B. DATA, LTD

$1.7M
3.

RWT PRODUCTION, LLC

$1.5M
4.

ACTBLUE TECHNICAL SERVICES

$1.3M
5.

GUSTO

$902K
6.

AMERICAN EXPRESS

$569K
7.

NGP VAN INC

$460K
8.

DOUBLE TAP CAMPAIGNS, LLC

$431K

Detailed Breakdown

Expenditures

Operating Costs

$97.0M

Operating Offsets

$9K

Net Operating

$97.0M

Transfers

Transfers Out

$1.4M

Refunds

Individual Refunds

$1.2M

Committee Refunds

$5K

Outside Spending (Super PACs)

Supporting

$14.5M

Opposing

$112.6M

Total Outside Spending

$127.1M

Top Outside Spenders

01

NRSC

-$26.2M
$26.2M
02

SENATE LEADERSHIP FUND

-$24.3M
$24.3M
03

DEFENDARIZONA

-$22.4M
$22.4M
04

CLUB FOR GROWTH ACTION

-$12.6M
$12.6M
05

THE SENTINEL ACTION FUND

-$10.7M
$10.7M
06

SAVING ARIZONA PAC

-$9.6M
$9.6M
07

PRIORITIES USA ACTION

+$6.1M
$6.1M
08

MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN INC.

-$5.2M
$5.2M

Independent expenditures are made without coordination with the candidate. Source: FEC Schedule E filings.

Coverage: 1/1/2019 – 12/31/2020FEC: S0AZ00350Updated: 8/12/2026Source: FEC.gov (all authorized committees)