Skip to content
Official portrait of Linda T. Sánchez, U.S. Representative for California

U.S. Representative

Linda T. Sánchez

California District 38

DemocratProgressive

Votes on Record

680

across 19 categories

Write Letter

Contact

202-225-6676Official Website

2309 Rayburn House Office Building Washington DC 20515-0538

Voting Profile

Legislative Record

680 votes analyzed

Most Active Policy Areas

#1 other#2 healthcare#3 budget#4 environment energy#5 agriculture

680

Votes Analyzed

Data sources: voteview, congress.gov

Political Position

Ideology Spectrum

-0.51Progressive

Rep. Linda T. Sánchez holds a NOMINATE ideology score of -0.507, placing her in the progressive wing of the Democratic Party. The average House Democrat scores around -0.380, meaning she consistently votes to the left of most members of her own party. In practical terms, she tends to support expanded government programs and progressive policy priorities more often than a typical Democrat.

LiberalModerateConservative
Democrat avg

More liberal than the average Democrat (-0.38)

Data source: VoteView NOMINATE scores (UCLA/UC San Diego)

Policy Positions

Category Breakdown

680

total votes analyzed

Overview

Rep. Linda T. Sánchez is a Democratic member of the U.S. House of Representatives from California with a substantial voting record of 680 recorded votes. Her voting patterns show strong engagement across a wide range of policy areas, with particularly active participation on healthcare, budget, defense, and environmental legislation. On healthcare, she has been one of her most active policy areas with 135 votes and a 67.4% yea rate, including support for motions related to the Do No Harm in Medicaid Act and the Lower Health Care Premiums for All Americans Act. She has consistently opposed Republican-led budget proposals, voting nay on the fiscal year 2027 congressional budget and continuing appropriations measures, reflecting the broader partisan divide on federal spending priorities. Her foreign policy record stands out with a 90.9% yea rate across 11 votes, suggesting broad support for bipartisan foreign policy measures. On defense, she voted yea 72.7% of the time across 33 votes, indicating she frequently supports defense-related legislation. On environmental and energy policy, her 31.4% yea rate reflects opposition to measures that would roll back environmental regulations, such as voting against congressional disapproval of California's harbor craft emissions standards. Her record on immigration (37.5% yea) and criminal justice (38.5% yea) shows frequent opposition to legislation in these areas during the current Congress, consistent with her progressive positioning within the Democratic caucus.

Key Positions

  • •Consistently supports healthcare-related legislation, voting yea on 67.4% of 135 healthcare votes, including backing motions on the Do No Harm in Medicaid Act and the Lower Health Care Premiums for All Americans Act.
  • •Opposes recent Republican-led budget and appropriations measures, voting nay on 67.3% of 55 budget votes, including the fiscal year 2027 congressional budget and continuing appropriations for FY2027.
  • •Supports environmental protections, voting against congressional disapproval of California's harbor craft emissions standards and supporting the Water Resources Development Act and the Ratepayer Protection Act.
  • •Frequently supports defense legislation, voting yea on 72.7% of 33 defense-related votes.
  • •Shows strong support for foreign policy measures, voting yea on 90.9% of 11 foreign policy votes.
  • •Frequently opposes immigration legislation brought to the floor, voting nay on 62.5% of 8 immigration votes.
  • •Supports agriculture-related measures at a moderate rate, voting yea on 54.5% of 33 agriculture votes, including the Agriculture Appropriations Act for 2027 and the Pet and Livestock Protection Act.
  • •Voted in favor of Social Security-related measures 66.7% of the time across 6 votes.

By Policy Area

Other283
62% yea1% other37% nay
Healthcare135
67% yea2% other31% nay
Budget & Spending55
31% yea2% other67% nay
Environment & Energy35
31% yea3% other66% nay
Agriculture33
55% yea6% other39% nay
Defense33
73% yea27% nay
Education14
57% yea7% other36% nay
Taxation13
54% yea8% other38% nay
Criminal Justice13
38% yea62% nay
Foreign Policy11
91% yea9% nay
Technology10
60% yea40% nay
Banking & Finance9
44% yea56% nay
Housing9
44% yea56% nay
Immigration8
38% yea63% nay
Social Security6
67% yea33% nay
Labor6
50% yea33% other17% nay
Infrastructure5
60% yea40% nay

Analysis updated: September 18, 2026

Campaign Finance

Follow the Money

Includes all authorized campaign committees (principal committee, joint fundraising, and other authorized committees). Outside spending by Super PACs and independent groups is shown separately below.

Verify on FEC.gov →

Career: $15.7M

Fundraising Over Time

Raised per election cycleSpent

Contribution Sources

Individual$343K

22%

PAC / Committees$1.2M

78%

Party Committee$32.68

0%

Individual Breakdown

Itemized (>$200)

$317K

Small Dollar (<$200)

$26K

Donation Sizes

Under $200
$30K · 9%
$200 – 499
$13K · 4%
$500 – 999
$57K · 17%
$1,000 – 1,999
$105K · 30%
$2,000+
$141K · 41%

Share of individual contribution dollars by donation size, current election cycle.

Where the Money Comes From

In-state (CA)$106K · 33%
Out-of-state$212K · 67%

Itemized individual contributions only (donations over $200 report the donor's state). Small-dollar donations are not included because the FEC does not itemize them.

CA (home)
$106K
DC
$76K
VA
$31K
MD
$27K
FL
$25K
MA
$6K
OH
$6K
TX
$5K

Top Contributors

See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded

Top Contributing Industries

Top Donor Employers

INVARIANT$14K
RETIRED$11K
SELF EMPLOYED$9K
RESOLUTION PUBLIC AFFAIRS$8K
COMCAST$7K
HACKMAN CAPITAL PARTNERS$7K
CASSIDY & ASSOC$7K
MILLER BARONDESS$7K
NFP$6K
S-3 GROUP$6K
ROCK CREEK COUNSEL$6K
RIDGELINE ADVOCACY GROUP$6K

Employer as self-reported by itemized donors. “Not Employed” and “Self-Employed” typically rank highest for small-dollar campaigns and include retirees.

Where the Money Goes

Spending by Purpose

Other / Uncategorized
$1.3M
Contributions
$225K
Fundraising
$60K
Administrative
$32K
Materials
$14K
Refunds
$13K
Travel
$10K
Advertising
$9K

Purpose categories are self-reported on FEC filings; large “Other” totals are common.

Top Payees

1.

JTH GROUP LLC

$261K
2.

BERGMANN ZWERDLING DIRECT

$260K
3.

DCCC

$225K
4.

AMERICAN EXPRESS

$216K
5.

THE CONRAD GROUP

$137K
6.

BLUEPRINT INTERACTIVE

$80K
7.

GLOBAL STRATEGY GROUP

$68K
8.

PAYCHEX

$60K

Detailed Breakdown

Expenditures

Operating Costs

$1.4M

Operating Offsets

$585.05

Net Operating

$1.4M

Refunds

Individual Refunds

$2K

Committee Refunds

$11K

Outside Spending (Super PACs)

Supporting

$51K

Opposing

$820

Total Outside Spending

$52K

Top Outside Spenders

01

CENTER FORWARD COMMITTEE

+$47K
$47K
02

COURAGE CALIFORNIA SUPER PAC

+$3K
$3K
03

TOGETHER WE THRIVE

-$750
$750
04

PLANNED PARENTHOOD ADVOCACY PROJECT LOS ANGELES COUNTY ACTION FUND

+$513.48
$513.48
05

PLANNED PARENTHOOD VOTES

+$195.45
$195.45
06

SIERRA CLUB POLITICAL COMMITTEE

+$70
$70
07

NEA ADVOCACY FUND

+$67.26
$67.26
08

CALIFORNIA LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS

-$50
$50

Independent expenditures are made without coordination with the candidate. Source: FEC Schedule E filings.

Coverage: 1/1/2025 – 6/30/2026FEC: H2CA39078Updated: 8/12/2026Source: FEC.gov (all authorized committees)
Linda T. Sánchez — U.S. Representative for California 38: Voting Record & Donors | True Vote