Skip to content

Voting Profile

Legislative Record

579 votes analyzed

Most Active Policy Areas

#1 other#2 environment energy#3 foreign policy#4 defense#5 budget

579

Votes Analyzed

Data sources: voteview, congress.gov

Political Position

Ideology Spectrum

0.59Conservative

Senator Katie Boyd Britt's NOMINATE ideology score of 0.588 places her in the conservative range of the political spectrum. Compared to the Republican Party average of 0.520, she votes somewhat more conservatively than the typical Republican senator. This positions her to the right of her party's center, though not at the furthest end of the conservative spectrum.

LiberalModerateConservative
Republican avg

Near the average for Republicans (0.52)

Data source: VoteView NOMINATE scores (UCLA/UC San Diego)

Policy Positions

Category Breakdown

579

total votes analyzed

Overview

Senator Katie Boyd Britt represents Alabama in the U.S. Senate and has cast 579 recorded votes. Her voting record shows strong alignment with Republican priorities across most policy areas, with particularly consistent support on foreign policy, immigration, and housing-related measures. Her highest rates of support appear in housing (100%), labor (100%), foreign policy (96.4%), and immigration (92.3%). She also shows strong support for infrastructure (90.9%), education (90%), and agriculture (88.9%) legislation that has come to a vote. These high approval rates suggest she frequently votes with the majority on bills in these areas. Her most divided voting areas include defense (50% yea), trade (33.3% yea), and healthcare (63.2% yea). The even split on defense votes is notable and may reflect specific disagreements on particular military authorization or spending measures. On trade, she voted against the majority of measures that came before her, suggesting skepticism toward certain trade proposals. On social issues with limited voting data, she voted against the one reproductive rights measure and the one criminal justice measure that reached the floor during her tenure. She supported both gun-related measures that came to a vote.

Key Positions

  • •Voted against a resolution to direct the removal of U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities involving Iran without congressional authorization, indicating support for maintaining the executive branch's flexibility in military operations in that region.
  • •Supported a resolution to withhold senators' pay in the event of a government shutdown, signaling a stance in favor of accountability measures for elected officials during budget impasses.
  • •Voted against establishing a deficit-neutral reserve fund related to the impact of hedge fund ownership on single-family home prices and rents.
  • •Voted against a joint resolution disapproving an EPA rule change related to PFAS chemical reporting timelines, siding with maintaining the existing regulatory approach on those chemicals.
  • •Consistently supported presidential nominations and confirmations, including judicial appointments and executive branch positions, voting yea on the large majority of such measures.
  • •Opposed the one reproductive rights measure that came to a vote during her tenure.
  • •Voted against most trade-related measures, supporting only 2 out of 6 trade bills, suggesting reservations about certain trade proposals.
  • •Supported military authorization and defense appropriations, voting yea on the fiscal year 2027 defense authorization bill.

By Policy Area

Other217
95% yea3% other2% nay
Environment & Energy65
72% yea6% other22% nay
Foreign Policy55
96% yea4% nay
Defense52
50% yea6% other44% nay
Budget & Spending43
77% yea2% other21% nay
Immigration26
92% yea8% nay
Taxation24
75% yea4% other21% nay
Healthcare19
63% yea5% other32% nay
Banking & Finance15
80% yea20% nay
Housing12
100% yea0% nay
Infrastructure11
91% yea9% nay
Education10
90% yea10% nay
Agriculture9
89% yea11% nay
Trade6
33% yea67% nay

Analysis updated: September 18, 2026

Campaign Finance

Follow the Money

Includes all authorized campaign committees (principal committee, joint fundraising, and other authorized committees). Outside spending by Super PACs and independent groups is shown separately below.

Verify on FEC.gov →

Career: $18.1M

Fundraising Over Time

Raised per election cycleSpent

Contribution Sources

Individual$5.2M

80%

PAC / Committees$1.3M

20%

Individual Breakdown

Itemized (>$200)

$3.2M

Small Dollar (<$200)

$2.1M

Donation Sizes

Under $200
$1.1M · 50%
$200 – 499
$31K · 1%
$500 – 999
$234K · 10%
$1,000 – 1,999
$190K · 9%
$2,000+
$652K · 29%

Share of individual contribution dollars by donation size, current election cycle.

Where the Money Comes From

In-state (AL)$535K · 39%
Out-of-state$828K · 61%

Itemized individual contributions only (donations over $200 report the donor's state). Small-dollar donations are not included because the FEC does not itemize them.

AL (home)
$535K
FL
$116K
VA
$109K
TX
$101K
CA
$72K
NY
$48K
DC
$41K
GA
$36K

Top Contributors

See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded

Top Contributing Industries

Top Donor Employers

RETIRED$306K
NULL$148K
SELF$23K
BEASLEY ALLEN$21K
SELF-EMPLOYED$16K
HOMEMAKER$14K
SULLIVAN BROTHERS FAMILY OF COMPANIES$11K
NOT APPLICABLE$10K
ATSC$8K
SHIELD AI$8K
KIDS$7K
BURTON PROPERTY GROUP$7K

Employer as self-reported by itemized donors. “Not Employed” and “Self-Employed” typically rank highest for small-dollar campaigns and include retirees.

Where the Money Goes

Spending by Purpose

Other / Uncategorized
$773K
Advertising
$470K
Administrative
$212K
Fundraising
$80K
Contributions
$28K
Refunds
$10K
Travel
$2K

Purpose categories are self-reported on FEC filings; large “Other” totals are common.

Top Payees

1.

CONVERGENCE MEDIA, LLC

$441K
2.

WINRED

$189K
3.

SKYE GLOBAL, LLC

$121K
4.

SOCKO STRATEGIES, LLC

$97K
5.

NEWMAN AND ASSOCIATES, LLC

$50K
6.

ROSS, SEAN

$50K
7.

CARDINAL CONSULTING, LLC

$48K
8.

THREE ARBOR INSURANCE, INC.

$46K

Detailed Breakdown

Expenditures

Operating Costs

$3.0M

Operating Offsets

$22K

Net Operating

$3.0M

Transfers

Transfers Out

$45K

Refunds

Individual Refunds

$18K

Committee Refunds

$3K

Outside Spending (Super PACs)

Supporting

$18.7M

Opposing

$7.8M

Total Outside Spending

$26.5M

Top Outside Spenders

01

ALABAMA CHRISTIAN CONSERVATIVES

+$7.6M
$7.6M
02

ALABAMA CONSERVATIVES FUND

+$6.5M
$6.5M
03

CLUB FOR GROWTH ACTION

-$5.2M
$5.2M
04

AMERICAN DREAM FEDERAL ACTION

+$3.3M
$3.3M
05

CONSERVATIVE OUTSIDER PAC INC

-$2.3M
$2.3M
06

ALABAMA'S FUTURE

+$845K
$845K
07

SECURE OUR FREEDOM ACTION FUND

+$396K
$396K
08

ALABAMA PATRIOTS PAC

-$320K
$320K

Independent expenditures are made without coordination with the candidate. Source: FEC Schedule E filings.

Coverage: 1/1/2023 – 6/30/2026FEC: S2AL00145Updated: 8/12/2026Source: FEC.gov (all authorized committees)