Skip to content
Official portrait of Julia Brownley, U.S. Representative for California

U.S. Representative

Julia Brownley

California District 26

DemocratProgressive

Votes on Record

544

across 19 categories

Write Letter

Contact

202-225-5811Official Website

2262 Rayburn House Office Building Washington DC 20515-0526

Voting Profile

Legislative Record

544 votes analyzed

Most Active Policy Areas

#1 other#2 healthcare#3 environment energy#4 defense#5 budget

544

Votes Analyzed

Data sources: voteview, congress.gov

Political Position

Ideology Spectrum

-0.30Progressive

Julia Brownley's voting record places her in the progressive wing of American politics, with a NOMINATE ideology score of -0.305 on a scale from -1 (most liberal) to +1 (most conservative). Compared to the average House Democrat (approximately -0.380), she votes slightly closer to the political center, meaning she occasionally diverges from her party's mainstream positions. She is best described as a moderate-to-progressive Democrat.

LiberalModerateConservative
Democrat avg

Near the average for Democrats (-0.38)

Data source: VoteView NOMINATE scores (UCLA/UC San Diego)

Policy Positions

Category Breakdown

544

total votes analyzed

Overview

Rep. Julia Brownley represents California in the U.S. House of Representatives as a Democrat with a moderately progressive voting record. Across 544 recorded votes, she has been most active in healthcare, environment and energy, defense, and budget policy. Her voting patterns show strong alignment with Democratic priorities on most issues, while her ideology score indicates she is somewhat more centrist than the typical House Democrat. In healthcare, Brownley has supported measures such as the Do No Harm in Medicaid Act and the Lower Health Care Premiums for All Americans Act. On defense and veterans' issues, she has shown strong support, voting in favor of bills like the Take Care of America's Veterans Act, while also engaging with War Powers Resolution debates regarding U.S. military involvement in Lebanon. She has voted unanimously in favor of foreign policy and labor-related measures that reached the House floor. On budget matters, Brownley has opposed the large majority of proposals brought to a vote, including the fiscal year 2027 congressional budget and continuing appropriations measures. In environment and energy policy, she has voted against most measures in that category, consistent with opposing efforts to roll back environmental regulations — for example, voting against congressional disapproval of EPA rules related to California's nonroad engine pollution standards. Her record on immigration shows opposition to most measures in that category, while she has supported the majority of education and taxation bills that came to a vote.

Key Positions

  • •Consistently supports veterans' affairs legislation, voting in favor of 72% of defense-related measures including the Take Care of America's Veterans Act (July 2026).
  • •Voted in favor of healthcare access measures such as the Do No Harm in Medicaid Act and the Lower Health Care Premiums for All Americans Act (December 2025).
  • •Opposed most budget and appropriations measures brought to a vote (81% nay), including the fiscal year 2027 budget resolution and continuing appropriations bills.
  • •Voted to preserve environmental regulations, including opposing a congressional resolution to disapprove EPA rules on California harbor craft emission standards (September 2026).
  • •Voted in favor of all 11 foreign policy measures on record, indicating consistent support for bipartisan foreign policy initiatives.
  • •Supported all labor-related measures on record (5 of 5 votes in favor).
  • •Opposed the majority of immigration-related measures (75% nay), voting against 6 of 8 bills in this category.
  • •Engaged actively on war powers questions, voting in favor of a War Powers Resolution to direct the removal of U.S. forces from hostilities in Lebanon (June 2026).

By Policy Area

Other279
60% yea5% other35% nay
Healthcare63
60% yea40% nay
Environment & Energy34
32% yea9% other59% nay
Defense32
72% yea28% nay
Budget & Spending31
19% yea4% other77% nay
Criminal Justice13
46% yea54% nay
Taxation12
75% yea25% nay
Agriculture11
45% yea55% nay
Foreign Policy11
100% yea0% nay
Education10
70% yea30% nay
Technology10
60% yea10% other30% nay
Housing9
44% yea56% nay
Immigration8
25% yea75% nay
Banking & Finance5
20% yea80% nay
Infrastructure5
60% yea20% other20% nay
Labor5
100% yea0% nay

Analysis updated: September 18, 2026

Campaign Finance

Follow the Money

Includes all authorized campaign committees (principal committee, joint fundraising, and other authorized committees). Outside spending by Super PACs and independent groups is shown separately below.

Verify on FEC.gov →

Career: $18.4M

Fundraising Over Time

Raised per election cycleSpent

Contribution Sources

Individual$241K

44%

PAC / Committees$311K

56%

Individual Breakdown

Itemized (>$200)

$199K

Small Dollar (<$200)

$42K

Donation Sizes

Under $200
$58K · 24%
$200 – 499
$7K · 3%
$500 – 999
$15K · 6%
$1,000 – 1,999
$51K · 21%
$2,000+
$111K · 46%

Share of individual contribution dollars by donation size, current election cycle.

Where the Money Comes From

In-state (CA)$168K · 84%
Out-of-state$31K · 16%

Itemized individual contributions only (donations over $200 report the donor's state). Small-dollar donations are not included because the FEC does not itemize them.

CA (home)
$168K
NV
$9K
CT
$7K
DC
$4K
FL
$3K
CO
$3K
OR
$2K
OK
$1K

Top Contributors

See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded

Top Contributing Industries

Top Donor Employers

N/A$45K
NOT EMPLOYED$35K
SELF-EMPLOYED$23K
HAAS AUTOMATION$7K
THE RING GROUP$7K
WESTERN PACIFIC MED-CORP$7K
UNITED STAFFING ASSOCIATES$7K
AMGEN INC$4K
VIACOM$4K
LOS ANGELES COUNTY$4K
BROKAW RANCH COMPANY$4K
KAISER PERMANENTE$4K

Employer as self-reported by itemized donors. “Not Employed” and “Self-Employed” typically rank highest for small-dollar campaigns and include retirees.

Where the Money Goes

Spending by Purpose

Other / Uncategorized
$297K
Contributions
$139K
Administrative
$66K
Transfers
$55K
Refunds
$53K
Fundraising
$24K
Advertising
$5K
Travel
$4K

Purpose categories are self-reported on FEC filings; large “Other” totals are common.

Top Payees

1.

DCCC

$105K
2.

THE STRATHDEE GROUP

$100K
3.

GUSTO

$58K
4.

LARA, JASMINE

$41K
5.

DEMOCRATIC CONGRESSIONAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE (DCCC)

$30K
6.

TEMPEST STRATEGIES LLC

$30K
7.

BLUE WAVE POLITICAL PARTNERS, LLC

$23K
8.

NEXT LEVEL PARTNERS

$23K

Detailed Breakdown

Expenditures

Operating Costs

$372K

Operating Offsets

$1K

Net Operating

$371K

Refunds

Individual Refunds

$35K

Committee Refunds

$19K

Outside Spending (Super PACs)

Supporting

$2.4M

Opposing

$5.5M

Total Outside Spending

$7.9M

Top Outside Spenders

01

AMERICAN FUTURE FUND

-$2.6M
$2.6M
02

US CHAMBER OF COMMERCE

-$1.2M
$1.2M
03

HOUSE MAJORITY PAC

+$1.2M
$1.2M
04

NATIONAL REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE

-$934K
$934K
05

CONGRESSIONAL LEADERSHIP FUND

-$479K
$479K
06

WOMEN VOTE!

+$429K
$429K
07

CALIFORNIA LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS

+$270K
$270K
08

LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS INC

+$200K
$200K

Independent expenditures are made without coordination with the candidate. Source: FEC Schedule E filings.

Coverage: 1/1/2025 – 6/30/2026FEC: H2CA00120Updated: 8/12/2026Source: FEC.gov (all authorized committees)