Skip to content
Official portrait of Juan Ciscomani, U.S. Representative for Arizona

U.S. Representative

Juan Ciscomani

Arizona District 6

RepublicanModerate Conservative

Votes on Record

463

across 19 categories

Write Letter

Contact

202-225-2542Official Website

461 Cannon House Office Building Washington DC 20515-0306

Voting Profile

Legislative Record

463 votes analyzed

Most Active Policy Areas

#1 other#2 environment energy#3 defense#4 budget#5 criminal justice

463

Votes Analyzed

Data sources: voteview, congress.gov

Political Position

Ideology Spectrum

0.29Moderate Conservative

Juan Ciscomani holds a moderate conservative position within the Republican Party. His NOMINATE ideology score of 0.295 places him noticeably to the left of the average House Republican (0.520), meaning he votes more moderately than most members of his party. In plain terms, he leans conservative but is one of the more centrist Republicans in the House.

LiberalModerateConservative
Republican avg

More liberal than the average Republican (0.52)

Data source: VoteView NOMINATE scores (UCLA/UC San Diego)

Policy Positions

Category Breakdown

463

total votes analyzed

Overview

Juan Ciscomani is a Republican U.S. Representative from Arizona whose voting record reflects a center-right approach across most policy areas. With 463 recorded votes, he has built a substantial record that shows consistent support for law enforcement and criminal justice measures, energy and environmental deregulation, budget and appropriations bills, and technology legislation. He tends to vote with his party on fiscal and regulatory matters while occasionally breaking from the Republican majority on select issues. His strongest areas of agreement with the House majority appear in criminal justice (92% yea), environment and energy (88% yea), and budget matters (88% yea). He has shown more mixed voting patterns in areas such as immigration and agriculture, where he voted yea on half of the recorded bills — a notable departure from the more uniform positions many Republicans take on immigration. His record on healthcare shows more opposition than support, voting nay on a majority of healthcare-related bills, and he consistently opposed labor-related legislation that came to a vote. As an Arizona border-state representative, Ciscomani's split record on immigration suggests he navigates competing pressures from national party positions and local district priorities. His overall profile is that of a pragmatic conservative who generally supports his party's agenda but demonstrates a willingness to deviate on specific votes, placing him in the more moderate wing of the House Republican conference.

Key Positions

  • •Voted yea on the congressional budget resolution for fiscal year 2027, supporting the Republican budget framework for the next decade.
  • •Voted yea on continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2027, helping to fund the government and avoid a shutdown.
  • •Voted nay on War Powers Resolution measures directing the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from Lebanon, siding with the position that the executive branch should retain authority over that deployment.
  • •Voted yea on a Congressional Review Act resolution disapproving an EPA rule on California harbor craft emission standards, supporting the rollback of that environmental regulation.
  • •Voted yea on the Ratepayer Protection Act and the Water Resources Development Act, supporting energy affordability and water infrastructure measures.
  • •Voted yea on all recorded criminal justice bills including the Prison Staff Safety Enhancement Act and a resolution memorializing law enforcement officers killed in the line of duty.
  • •Voted nay on all five recorded labor bills, opposing labor-related legislation that reached the House floor.
  • •Split evenly on immigration votes — 4 yea and 3 nay out of 8 recorded votes — suggesting a case-by-case approach rather than a uniform stance.

By Policy Area

Other275
70% yea7% other23% nay
Environment & Energy34
88% yea6% other6% nay
Defense25
64% yea4% other32% nay
Budget & Spending24
88% yea13% nay
Criminal Justice13
92% yea8% other0% nay
Taxation11
73% yea18% other9% nay
Foreign Policy11
27% yea9% other64% nay
Technology10
80% yea20% other0% nay
Healthcare9
33% yea11% other56% nay
Education9
67% yea11% other22% nay
Agriculture8
50% yea12% other38% nay
Immigration8
50% yea12% other38% nay
Housing8
75% yea12% other13% nay
Infrastructure5
80% yea20% other0% nay
Labor5
0% yea20% other80% nay

Analysis updated: September 18, 2026

Campaign Finance

Follow the Money

Includes all authorized campaign committees (principal committee, joint fundraising, and other authorized committees). Outside spending by Super PACs and independent groups is shown separately below.

Verify on FEC.gov →

Career: $16.6M

Fundraising Over Time

Raised per election cycleSpent

Contribution Sources

Individual$2.5M

82%

PAC / Committees$519K

17%

Party Committee$7K

0%

Individual Breakdown

Itemized (>$200)

$2.2M

Small Dollar (<$200)

$231K

Donation Sizes

Under $200
$680K · 14%
$200 – 499
$113K · 2%
$500 – 999
$333K · 7%
$1,000 – 1,999
$690K · 14%
$2,000+
$3.0M · 62%

Share of individual contribution dollars by donation size, current election cycle.

Where the Money Comes From

In-state (AZ)$1.5M · 35%
Out-of-state$2.8M · 65%

Itemized individual contributions only (donations over $200 report the donor's state). Small-dollar donations are not included because the FEC does not itemize them.

AZ (home)
$1.5M
TX
$531K
FL
$475K
CA
$427K
NY
$248K
LA
$97K
IL
$92K
VA
$86K

Top Contributors

See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded

Top Contributing Industries

Top Donor Employers

RETIRED$861K
N/A$312K
SELF$196K
SELF EMPLOYED$112K
NOT EMPLOYED$47K
HOMEMAKER$37K
HSL PROPERTIES$29K
HYDRONALIX$28K
INFORMATION REQUESTED$27K
COX ENTERPRISES$22K
ENTREPRENEUR$21K
NULL$20K

Employer as self-reported by itemized donors. “Not Employed” and “Self-Employed” typically rank highest for small-dollar campaigns and include retirees.

Where the Money Goes

Spending by Purpose

Other / Uncategorized
$1.1M
Administrative
$474K
Fundraising
$354K
Advertising
$278K
Refunds
$40K
Contributions
$6K
Travel
$1K

Purpose categories are self-reported on FEC filings; large “Other” totals are common.

Top Payees

1.

ROSE STRATEGIES LLC

$337K
2.

TARGETED VICTORY

$329K
3.

AMERICAN EXPRESS

$287K
4.

MENTZER MEDIA

$269K
5.

RJW STRATEGIES LLC

$114K
6.

SNELL & WILMER

$68K
7.

PUBLIC OPINION STRATEGIES

$67K
8.

WINGED VICTORY

$66K

Detailed Breakdown

Expenditures

Operating Costs

$3.2M

Operating Offsets

$3K

Net Operating

$3.2M

Transfers

Transfers Out

$149K

Refunds

Individual Refunds

$35K

Committee Refunds

$2K

Outside Spending (Super PACs)

Supporting

$6.2M

Opposing

$16.8M

Total Outside Spending

$23.0M

Top Outside Spenders

01

HMP

-$6.6M
$6.6M
02

DCCC

-$5.0M
$5.0M
03

FAIRSHAKE

+$3.2M
$3.2M
04

GIFFORDS PAC

-$2.1M
$2.1M
05

LCV VICTORY FUND

-$2.0M
$2.0M
06

CONGRESSIONAL LEADERSHIP FUND

+$1.4M
$1.4M
07

AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY ACTION, INC. (AFP ACTION) DBA CVA ACTION AND DBA LIBRE ACTION

+$832K
$832K
08

RETIRED AMERICANS PAC

-$669K
$669K

Independent expenditures are made without coordination with the candidate. Source: FEC Schedule E filings.

Coverage: 7/1/2021 – 12/31/2022FEC: H2AZ02360Updated: 8/12/2026Source: FEC.gov (all authorized committees)