Skip to content

Voting Profile

Legislative Record

615 votes analyzed

Most Active Policy Areas

#1 other#2 environment energy#3 defense#4 foreign policy#5 budget

615

Votes Analyzed

Data sources: voteview, congress.gov

Political Position

Ideology Spectrum

-0.29Moderate Liberal

Senator Hickenlooper's NOMINATE score of -0.288 places him in the moderate-liberal range of American politics. Compared to the average Senate Democrat score of approximately -0.380, he sits noticeably closer to the political center, making him one of the more conservative-leaning members of his party. In practical terms, this means he generally aligns with Democratic priorities but is more likely than many of his colleagues to break with the party on certain votes or to support bipartisan compromises.

LiberalModerateConservative
Democrat avg

Near the average for Democrats (-0.38)

Data source: VoteView NOMINATE scores (UCLA/UC San Diego)

Policy Positions

Category Breakdown

615

total votes analyzed

Overview

John Hickenlooper, a Democrat representing Colorado in the U.S. Senate, has built a voting record across 615 recorded votes that reflects a center-left approach to governance. Before entering the Senate, Hickenlooper served as Governor of Colorado and Mayor of Denver, bringing an executive-branch perspective that often shows in his pragmatic approach to legislation. His most active voting areas include defense, environment and energy, healthcare, and budget matters. On defense, he has supported military authorization bills while also voting to require congressional approval for military action against Iran, reflecting a stance that balances national security with legislative oversight. On environment and energy, he has engaged with regulatory issues including PFAS chemical reporting rules and energy-related trade provisions, consistent with Colorado's mix of energy production and environmental priorities. In budget and taxation matters, Hickenlooper has voted for measures addressing housing costs, grocery prices, and government shutdown accountability, while opposing many broader budget proposals from the opposing party. His healthcare votes are relatively balanced between yea and nay, suggesting engagement with specific policy details rather than blanket support or opposition. His voting pattern on nominations and procedural matters — reflected in the large 'Other' category — shows frequent opposition to the current administration's nominees, which is typical for a senator in the minority party. On trade, he has supported most measures that came to a vote, and on criminal justice, his limited votes have all been in favor of the measures considered.

Key Positions

  • •Voted to require congressional authorization before military action against Iran, supporting the principle that Congress — not the president alone — should decide when the country goes to war.
  • •Supported a measure to withhold senators' pay during a government shutdown, signaling a stance on fiscal accountability for elected officials.
  • •Voted for deficit-neutral proposals addressing the impact of hedge fund ownership on single-family home prices and rent, indicating concern about housing affordability.
  • •Supported a provision related to duties on countries purchasing Russian crude oil or facilitating sanctions evasion, reflecting engagement with energy trade and foreign policy intersections.
  • •Voted in favor of legislation protecting student athletes' name, image, and likeness rights in college sports.
  • •Opposed the current administration's judicial and executive branch nominees in a pattern consistent with his party's minority position.
  • •Voted for a deficit-neutral reserve fund related to grocery costs, indicating attention to consumer price concerns.
  • •Supported a joint resolution on PFAS chemical reporting rules under the Toxic Substances Control Act, engaging with environmental regulation of industrial chemicals.

By Policy Area

Other223
13% yea2% other85% nay
Environment & Energy71
31% yea1% other68% nay
Defense56
63% yea38% nay
Foreign Policy55
16% yea2% other82% nay
Budget & Spending44
23% yea77% nay
Healthcare35
46% yea54% nay
Immigration26
23% yea77% nay
Taxation24
54% yea46% nay
Banking & Finance15
20% yea80% nay
Housing12
50% yea50% nay
Education11
9% yea91% nay
Infrastructure11
27% yea73% nay
Agriculture9
11% yea89% nay
Trade6
67% yea33% nay
Social Security5
20% yea80% nay

Analysis updated: September 18, 2026

Campaign Finance

Follow the Money

Includes all authorized campaign committees (principal committee, joint fundraising, and other authorized committees). Outside spending by Super PACs and independent groups is shown separately below.

Verify on FEC.gov →

Career: $54.5M

Fundraising Over Time

Raised per election cycleSpent

Contribution Sources

Individual$7.6M

87%

PAC / Committees$1.1M

12%

Party Committee$62K

1%

Individual Breakdown

Itemized (>$200)

$5.6M

Small Dollar (<$200)

$1.9M

Donation Sizes

Under $200
$1.8M · 25%
$200 – 499
$237K · 3%
$500 – 999
$531K · 8%
$1,000 – 1,999
$952K · 13%
$2,000+
$3.6M · 51%

Share of individual contribution dollars by donation size, current election cycle.

Where the Money Comes From

In-state (CO)$1.8M · 32%
Out-of-state$4.0M · 68%

Itemized individual contributions only (donations over $200 report the donor's state). Small-dollar donations are not included because the FEC does not itemize them.

CO (home)
$1.8M
NY
$679K
CA
$674K
TX
$330K
MA
$270K
IL
$258K
FL
$208K
DC
$154K

Top Contributors

See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded

Top Contributing Industries

Top Donor Employers

NOT EMPLOYED$2.0M
SELF EMPLOYED$459K
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS$48K
NEXTERA ENERGY$25K
APOLLO GLOBAL MANAGEMENT$25K
MICROSOFT CORPORATION$21K
XCEL ENERGY$20K
COMCAST$20K
APOLLO$17K
BROWNSTEIN HYATT FARBER SCHRECK, LLP$15K
U.S. SENATE$15K
INTERMEDIATE CAPITAL GROUP$14K

Employer as self-reported by itemized donors. “Not Employed” and “Self-Employed” typically rank highest for small-dollar campaigns and include retirees.

Where the Money Goes

Spending by Purpose

Other / Uncategorized
$4.0M
Advertising
$2.4M
Fundraising
$820K
Administrative
$86K
Refunds
$82K
Materials
$12K
Contributions
$1K
Travel
$500.42

Purpose categories are self-reported on FEC filings; large “Other” totals are common.

Top Payees

1.

ASCEND DIGITAL STRATEGIES, LLC

$1.4M
2.

GAMBIT STRATEGIES LLC

$1.1M
3.

CANAL PARTNERS MEDIA

$983K
4.

PAYROLL DATA PROCESSING

$604K
5.

QCT PRODUCTION

$495K
6.

GUSTO

$484K
7.

SALK STRATEGIES

$465K
8.

AMERICAN EXPRESS

$339K

Detailed Breakdown

Expenditures

Operating Costs

$9.7M

Operating Offsets

$115K

Net Operating

$9.6M

Refunds

Individual Refunds

$59K

Committee Refunds

$31K

Outside Spending (Super PACs)

Supporting

$7.7M

Opposing

$33.5M

Total Outside Spending

$41.3M

Top Outside Spenders

01

SENATE LEADERSHIP FUND

-$15.7M
$15.7M
02

NRSC

-$15.5M
$15.5M
03

SMP

+$5.3M
$5.3M
04

FAIR SHARE ACTION

+$1.5M
$1.5M
05

ESAFUND

-$1.1M
$1.1M
06

NRA VICTORY FUND, INC.

-$774K
$774K
07

NRDC ACTION VOTES

+$648K
$648K
08

AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY ACTION, INC.(AFP ACTION)

-$300K
$300K

Independent expenditures are made without coordination with the candidate. Source: FEC Schedule E filings.

Coverage: 1/1/2021 – 6/30/2026FEC: S0CO00575Updated: 8/12/2026Source: FEC.gov (all authorized committees)
John W. Hickenlooper — U.S. Senator for Colorado: Voting Record & Donors | True Vote