Skip to content
Official portrait of John Garamendi, U.S. Representative for California

U.S. Representative

John Garamendi

California District 8

DemocratProgressive

Votes on Record

579

across 19 categories

Write Letter

Contact

202-225-1880Official Website

2428 Rayburn House Office Building Washington DC 20515-0508

Voting Profile

Legislative Record

579 votes analyzed

Most Active Policy Areas

#1 other#2 healthcare#3 environment energy#4 budget#5 defense

579

Votes Analyzed

Data sources: voteview, congress.gov

Political Position

Ideology Spectrum

-0.31Progressive

Rep. John Garamendi holds progressive political positions, placing him left of center on the ideological spectrum. His NOMINATE score of -0.314 is slightly closer to the center than the average House Democrat (-0.380), meaning he occasionally breaks from his party's most liberal positions. This places him as a moderate-to-progressive Democrat who leans toward the center of his party on some issues.

LiberalModerateConservative
Democrat avg

Near the average for Democrats (-0.38)

Data source: VoteView NOMINATE scores (UCLA/UC San Diego)

Policy Positions

Category Breakdown

579

total votes analyzed

Overview

John Garamendi is a Democratic member of the U.S. House of Representatives from California with a voting record that spans a wide range of policy areas. With 579 recorded votes, he has been an active participant in House proceedings across healthcare, defense, environment and energy, budget, and other categories. On healthcare, Garamendi has voted in favor of measures more often than not, supporting motions related to Medicaid protections and efforts to lower health care premiums. In defense and foreign policy, he has shown consistent support for veterans' legislation and has engaged with War Powers Resolution debates regarding the use of military force abroad, voting both for and against different versions of troop withdrawal measures — suggesting he evaluates military engagement questions on a case-by-case basis. On budget and fiscal matters, Garamendi has predominantly voted against recent budget proposals, including the fiscal year 2027 congressional budget and continuing appropriations measures. His voting pattern on environment and energy bills shows more nay votes than yea votes, though several recent votes in this category are recorded as not voting. On immigration and criminal justice, his limited voting samples lean toward opposing the measures that came to the floor. Garamendi's overall profile reflects a legislator who generally aligns with Democratic priorities but shows some independence from his party's left wing, particularly on issues where pragmatic or district-specific considerations may come into play.

Key Positions

  • •Supported veterans' legislation, voting yea on the Take Care of America's Veterans Act in July 2026.
  • •Voted in favor of a War Powers Resolution measure directing the removal of U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities in Lebanon (June 2026), but voted against a similar but distinct version of the same withdrawal proposal earlier that month — indicating he weighs the specific terms of military authorization carefully.
  • •Opposed the fiscal year 2027 congressional budget resolution and the continuing appropriations measure for FY2027, voting nay on both in July 2026.
  • •Supported healthcare-related motions, including voting yea on recommit motions for the Do No Harm in Medicaid Act and the Lower Health Care Premiums for All Americans Act in December 2025.
  • •Voted in favor of foreign policy measures at a high rate, supporting 9 out of 11 recorded foreign policy votes (81.8% yea).
  • •Supported education-related legislation in 7 out of 10 recorded votes (70% yea), and labor measures in 4 out of 6 votes (66.7% yea).

By Policy Area

Other283
54% yea18% other28% nay
Healthcare87
61% yea1% other38% nay
Environment & Energy35
29% yea22% other49% nay
Budget & Spending30
17% yea6% other77% nay
Defense30
63% yea10% other27% nay
Agriculture16
50% yea50% nay
Taxation13
54% yea15% other31% nay
Criminal Justice13
15% yea47% other38% nay
Foreign Policy11
82% yea18% other0% nay
Education10
70% yea10% other20% nay
Technology10
50% yea20% other30% nay
Housing9
33% yea11% other56% nay
Immigration8
25% yea12% other63% nay
Banking & Finance7
29% yea71% nay
Labor6
67% yea33% nay
Infrastructure5
40% yea20% other40% nay

Analysis updated: September 18, 2026

Campaign Finance

Follow the Money

Includes all authorized campaign committees (principal committee, joint fundraising, and other authorized committees). Outside spending by Super PACs and independent groups is shown separately below.

Verify on FEC.gov →

Career: $11.4M

Fundraising Over Time

Raised per election cycleSpent

Contribution Sources

Individual$155K

32%

PAC / Committees$335K

68%

Individual Breakdown

Itemized (>$200)

$147K

Small Dollar (<$200)

$8K

Donation Sizes

Under $200
$9K · 6%
$200 – 499
$3K · 2%
$500 – 999
$21K · 13%
$1,000 – 1,999
$43K · 28%
$2,000+
$79K · 51%

Share of individual contribution dollars by donation size, current election cycle.

Where the Money Comes From

In-state (CA)$115K · 78%
Out-of-state$32K · 22%

Itemized individual contributions only (donations over $200 report the donor's state). Small-dollar donations are not included because the FEC does not itemize them.

CA (home)
$115K
DC
$8K
TX
$7K
VA
$5K
TN
$4K
MD
$3K
FL
$3K
NY
$2K

Top Contributors

See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded

Top Contributing Industries

Top Donor Employers

NOT EMPLOYED$22K
NULL$19K
SELF$12K
HALL FINANCIAL GROUP$7K
NONE$5K
MARCUS & MILLICHAP$5K
SHERNOFF BIDART ECHEVERRIA BENTLEY LLP$4K
STEPHEN DILEO$4K
SELF-EMPLOYED$4K
LAWRENCE FAMILY$4K
TOWNSEND PUBLIC AFFAIRS$4K
DOWNEY BRAND$3K

Employer as self-reported by itemized donors. “Not Employed” and “Self-Employed” typically rank highest for small-dollar campaigns and include retirees.

Where the Money Goes

Spending by Purpose

Other / Uncategorized
$287K
Contributions
$147K
Transfers
$60K
Advertising
$42K
Materials
$8K
Refunds
$5K
Fundraising
$5K
Travel
$2K

Purpose categories are self-reported on FEC filings; large “Other” totals are common.

Top Payees

1.

DCCC

$190K
2.

BANK OF AMERICA COMMERCIAL CARD

$158K
3.

PLAVIDIAN

$42K
4.

NGP VAN, INC.

$31K
5.

POLITICAL COMPLIANCE MANAGEMENT SERVICES

$23K
6.

WISEMAN, HILLARY

$18K
7.

PAYCHEX

$11K
8.

PASCALINE FINE CATERING

$8K

Detailed Breakdown

Expenditures

Operating Costs

$332K

Operating Offsets

$42

Net Operating

$332K

Refunds

Individual Refunds

$3.22

Committee Refunds

$5K

Outside Spending (Super PACs)

Supporting

$6K

Opposing

$220K

Total Outside Spending

$226K

Top Outside Spenders

01

AMERICANS FOR ACCOUNTABILITY IN LEADERSHIP

-$168K
$168K
02

AMERICAN ACTION NETWORK INC

-$52K
$52K
03

COURAGE CALIFORNIA SUPER PAC

+$3K
$3K
04

ENVIRONMENT CALIFORNIA INC

+$2K
$2K
05

TOGETHER WE THRIVE

+$750
$750
06

J STREET

+$440.13
$440.13
07

SIERRA CLUB POLITICAL COMMITTEE

+$370
$370
08

WOMEN SPEAK OUT PAC

-$302.48
$302.48

Independent expenditures are made without coordination with the candidate. Source: FEC Schedule E filings.

Coverage: 1/1/2025 – 6/30/2026FEC: H0CA10149Updated: 8/12/2026Source: FEC.gov (all authorized committees)
John Garamendi — U.S. Representative for California 8: Voting Record & Donors | True Vote