
U.S. Representative
John B. Larson
Connecticut District 1
Votes on Record
719
across 19 categories
Contact

U.S. Representative
Connecticut District 1
Votes on Record
719
across 19 categories
Contact
Voting Profile
Most Active Policy Areas
719
Votes Analyzed
Data sources: voteview, congress.gov
Political Position
John B. Larson's NOMINATE ideology score of -0.396 places him slightly to the left of the average House Democrat (-0.380), indicating he holds progressive positions on most issues. In practical terms, this means he votes with the liberal wing of his party more often than the typical Democrat, though the difference is modest. His voting record reflects mainstream Democratic priorities with a slight lean toward more progressive stances.
Near the average for Democrats (-0.38)
Data source: VoteView NOMINATE scores (UCLA/UC San Diego)
Policy Positions
719
total votes analyzed
Overview
John B. Larson is a long-serving Democratic representative from Connecticut with a substantial voting record of 719 recorded votes. His most active policy areas are healthcare, budget matters, agriculture, defense, and environment and energy — together making up the majority of his recorded votes. On healthcare, which accounts for his largest single-issue vote count, Larson has voted in favor of legislation roughly two-thirds of the time, including support for motions related to Medicaid protections and efforts to lower health care premiums. On budget and spending legislation, he has more often voted against proposals (about 60% nay), which is consistent with a pattern of opposing fiscal plans put forward by the opposing party. His defense-related votes show relatively strong support at 77%, and he has voted in favor of nearly all foreign policy measures that came before him. Larson's record on immigration stands out as his most one-sided category, with only 1 out of 8 votes in favor — suggesting consistent opposition to the immigration bills that reached the floor during this period. On environment and energy issues, he voted nay about 69% of the time, which may reflect opposition to energy legislation he viewed as insufficient on environmental grounds. His votes on labor, agriculture, and infrastructure generally trend in favor of the legislation presented. Overall, Larson's record is that of a reliable Democratic vote who aligns closely with his party's positions across most policy areas, with particular engagement on healthcare and fiscal policy.
Key Positions
By Policy Area
Analysis updated: September 18, 2026
Campaign Finance
Includes all authorized campaign committees (principal committee, joint fundraising, and other authorized committees). Outside spending by Super PACs and independent groups is shown separately below.
Verify on FEC.gov →Career: $21.7M
Fundraising Over Time
Contribution Sources
54%
46%
Individual Breakdown
Itemized (>$200)
$1.3M
Small Dollar (<$200)
$133K
Donation Sizes
Share of individual contribution dollars by donation size, current election cycle.
Where the Money Comes From
Itemized individual contributions only (donations over $200 report the donor's state). Small-dollar donations are not included because the FEC does not itemize them.
Top Contributors
Top Contributing Industries
Top Donor Employers
Employer as self-reported by itemized donors. “Not Employed” and “Self-Employed” typically rank highest for small-dollar campaigns and include retirees.
Where the Money Goes
Spending by Purpose
Purpose categories are self-reported on FEC filings; large “Other” totals are common.
Top Payees
NUTMEG STRATEGIES
THRESHOLD GROUP, INC.
AMERICAN EXPRESS
ADVANCED NETWORK STRATEGIES, LLC
GQR
BUYING TIME LLC
ANTICIPATE PUBLIC AFFAIRS
PERKINS COIE
Detailed Breakdown
Expenditures
Operating Costs
$2.1M
Operating Offsets
$6K
Net Operating
$2.1M
Refunds
Individual Refunds
$9K
Committee Refunds
$6K
Outside Spending (Super PACs)
Supporting
$2K
Opposing
$135
Total Outside Spending
$2K
Top Outside Spenders
CT WORKING FAMILIES FEDERAL PAC D/B/A TAKE BACK CONGRESS CT
SIERRA CLUB POLITICAL COMMITTEE
PLANNED PARENTHOOD VOTES
NATIONAL ABORTION AND REPRODUCTIVE RIG
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIREFIGHTERS INTERESTED IN REGISTRATION AND EDUCATION PAC
NEA ADVOCACY FUND
SIERRA CLUB INDEPENDENT ACTION
PLANNED PARENTHOOD ACTION FUND INC
Independent expenditures are made without coordination with the candidate. Source: FEC Schedule E filings.
Voting Record
719 votes across 19 categories