Skip to content
Official portrait of Jimmy Panetta, U.S. Representative for California

U.S. Representative

Jimmy Panetta

California District 19

DemocratModerate Liberal

Votes on Record

510

across 19 categories

Write Letter

Contact

202-225-2861Official Website

200 Cannon House Office Building Washington DC 20515-0519

Voting Profile

Legislative Record

510 votes analyzed

Most Active Policy Areas

#1 other#2 healthcare#3 environment energy#4 budget#5 defense

510

Votes Analyzed

Data sources: voteview, congress.gov

Political Position

Ideology Spectrum

-0.28Moderate Liberal

Jimmy Panetta's NOMINATE ideology score of -0.283 places him in the moderate-liberal range of the political spectrum. For context, the average House Democrat scores around -0.380, meaning Panetta votes somewhat more conservatively than the typical member of his party. He aligns with mainstream Democratic positions on most issues but shows a willingness to break from his party's left wing on select matters.

LiberalModerateConservative
Democrat avg

Near the average for Democrats (-0.38)

Data source: VoteView NOMINATE scores (UCLA/UC San Diego)

Policy Positions

Category Breakdown

510

total votes analyzed

Overview

Jimmy Panetta is a Democratic representative from California who has cast 510 recorded votes. His voting record reflects broadly center-left priorities with a pragmatic streak. He consistently supports legislation in areas like healthcare, criminal justice reform, infrastructure, and labor protections, while frequently opposing Republican-led budget proposals and certain immigration and housing measures that came to the floor. On foreign policy, Panetta has voted in favor of every bill that reached the floor in that category, signaling strong engagement on international matters. His defense voting is more nuanced — he supported veterans' care legislation but voted against the fiscal year 2027 National Defense Authorization Act and a War Powers Resolution measure regarding Lebanon, suggesting he evaluates defense bills on their individual merits rather than along strict party lines. Panetta's environmental and energy votes show a mixed pattern: he opposed a congressional disapproval of an EPA rule protecting California harbor craft emission standards, consistent with supporting his home state's environmental regulations, while also voting for the Ratepayer Protection Act and Water Resources Development Act. On taxation, he voted in favor of most tax-related bills that came before him, supporting 9 out of 11 measures. His budget votes are notably oppositional — he voted against 22 of 28 budget-related measures, which largely reflects party-line opposition to Republican-authored spending plans. His support for infrastructure and labor legislation, where he voted in favor 80% of the time in each category, rounds out a profile of a legislator focused on economic investment and worker protections.

Key Positions

  • •Voted in favor of all 11 foreign policy measures that came to the floor, indicating consistent support for U.S. engagement in international affairs.
  • •Opposed the fiscal year 2027 budget resolution and continuing appropriations, reflecting disagreement with the majority party's spending priorities.
  • •Supported healthcare legislation including motions related to the Do No Harm in Medicaid Act and the Lower Health Care Premiums for All Americans Act.
  • •Voted against a congressional resolution to disapprove California's harbor craft emission standards, defending his home state's environmental regulations.
  • •Supported the Take Care of America's Veterans Act while voting against the FY2027 National Defense Authorization Act, showing selective engagement on defense matters.
  • •Voted in favor of infrastructure and labor bills at an 80% rate in both categories, supporting investment in public works and worker protections.
  • •Opposed 5 of 8 immigration-related measures and 6 of 8 housing-related measures that reached the floor.

By Policy Area

Other278
72% yea28% nay
Healthcare39
74% yea26% nay
Environment & Energy34
35% yea65% nay
Budget & Spending28
21% yea79% nay
Defense28
57% yea43% nay
Criminal Justice13
77% yea23% nay
Education11
64% yea36% nay
Taxation11
82% yea18% nay
Foreign Policy11
100% yea0% nay
Agriculture10
60% yea40% nay
Technology10
70% yea30% nay
Immigration8
38% yea63% nay
Housing8
25% yea75% nay
Social Security5
60% yea40% nay
Infrastructure5
80% yea20% nay
Labor5
80% yea20% nay

Analysis updated: September 18, 2026

Campaign Finance

Follow the Money

Includes all authorized campaign committees (principal committee, joint fundraising, and other authorized committees). Outside spending by Super PACs and independent groups is shown separately below.

Verify on FEC.gov →

Career: $13.6M

Fundraising Over Time

Raised per election cycleSpent

Contribution Sources

Individual$1.3M

45%

PAC / Committees$1.6M

55%

Individual Breakdown

Itemized (>$200)

$1.2M

Small Dollar (<$200)

$89K

Donation Sizes

Under $200
$124K · 10%
$200 – 499
$52K · 4%
$500 – 999
$165K · 13%
$1,000 – 1,999
$425K · 33%
$2,000+
$530K · 41%

Share of individual contribution dollars by donation size, current election cycle.

Where the Money Comes From

In-state (CA)$642K · 53%
Out-of-state$566K · 47%

Itemized individual contributions only (donations over $200 report the donor's state). Small-dollar donations are not included because the FEC does not itemize them.

CA (home)
$642K
NY
$114K
FL
$84K
TX
$49K
DC
$39K
MA
$39K
VA
$33K
MD
$24K

Top Contributors

See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded

Top Contributing Industries

Top Donor Employers

NOT EMPLOYED$321K
SELF EMPLOYED$113K
NULL$21K
HEALTHEQUITY$14K
ANDREESSEN HOROWITZ$14K
ARNOLD VENTURES$14K
NFP$11K
APOLLO$11K
BLOOM ENERGY$11K
APOLLO GLOBAL MANAGEMENT$10K
BLACKSTONE INC.$8K
SEAN N. PARKER FOUNDATION$7K

Employer as self-reported by itemized donors. “Not Employed” and “Self-Employed” typically rank highest for small-dollar campaigns and include retirees.

Where the Money Goes

Spending by Purpose

Other / Uncategorized
$1.1M
Contributions
$313K
Transfers
$65K
Administrative
$29K
Fundraising
$20K
Advertising
$3K
Refunds
$1K

Purpose categories are self-reported on FEC filings; large “Other” totals are common.

Top Payees

1.

DCCC

$360K
2.

POLITICAL FRAME WORKS, LLC

$203K
3.

MOLLY ALLEN ASSOCIATES, LLC

$202K
4.

SCREEN STRATEGIES MEDIA

$148K
5.

RAMP BUSINESS CORPORATION

$141K
6.

NEW BLUE INTERACTIVE, LLC

$102K
7.

KAHN COMMUNICATIONS

$65K
8.

BLUE WAVE POLITICAL PARTNERS

$49K

Detailed Breakdown

Expenditures

Operating Costs

$1.1M

Operating Offsets

$317.34

Net Operating

$1.1M

Transfers

Transfers Out

$4K

Refunds

Individual Refunds

$2K

Outside Spending (Super PACs)

Supporting

$193K

Opposing

$0

Total Outside Spending

$193K

Top Outside Spenders

01

WITH HONOR FUND, INC.

+$151K
$151K
02

WITH HONOR FUND II, INC.

+$29K
$29K
03

MONTEREY COUNTY DEMOCRATIC CENTRAL COMMITTEE

+$6K
$6K
04

COURAGE CALIFORNIA SUPER PAC

+$2K
$2K
05

READY FOR REFORM.COM SPONSORED BY DEPUTY SHERIFFS' ASSOCIATION OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY

+$2K
$2K
06

SOUTH BAY AFL-CIO LABOR COUNCIL

+$1K
$1K
07

TOGETHER WE THRIVE

+$750
$750
08

DEMOCRATIC WOMEN OF MONTEREY COUNTY

+$557.36
$557.36

Independent expenditures are made without coordination with the candidate. Source: FEC Schedule E filings.

Coverage: 1/1/2025 – 6/30/2026FEC: H6CA20152Updated: 8/12/2026Source: FEC.gov (all authorized committees)