Skip to content
Official portrait of Jimmy Gomez, U.S. Representative for California

U.S. Representative

Jimmy Gomez

California District 34

DemocratProgressive

Votes on Record

503

across 19 categories

Write Letter

Contact

202-225-6235Official Website

506 Cannon House Office Building Washington DC 20515-0534

Voting Profile

Legislative Record

503 votes analyzed

Most Active Policy Areas

#1 other#2 healthcare#3 environment energy#4 budget#5 defense

503

Votes Analyzed

Data sources: voteview, congress.gov

Political Position

Ideology Spectrum

-0.53Progressive

Rep. Jimmy Gomez holds a NOMINATE ideology score of -0.531, placing him firmly in the progressive wing of the Democratic Party. For context, the average House Democrat scores around -0.38, meaning Gomez votes to the left of most members of his own party. This positions him as a consistently liberal voice in the U.S. House, though not among the furthest-left members of the chamber.

LiberalModerateConservative
Democrat avg

More liberal than the average Democrat (-0.38)

Data source: VoteView NOMINATE scores (UCLA/UC San Diego)

Policy Positions

Category Breakdown

503

total votes analyzed

Overview

Jimmy Gomez is a Democratic member of the U.S. House of Representatives from California with 503 recorded votes in this dataset. His voting record reflects strong alignment with progressive Democratic priorities across healthcare, labor, and social safety-net legislation, while frequently opposing Republican-sponsored budget resolutions, energy deregulation measures, and immigration enforcement bills. On healthcare, Gomez has been one of the more active voters in the dataset, supporting 80% of healthcare-related measures that came to the floor, including efforts to protect Medicaid and lower insurance premiums. In contrast, he opposed the large majority of budget resolutions and appropriations bills (voting yea only 20.7% of the time), which in the current Congress have been authored primarily by the Republican majority. Gomez shows a pattern of supporting veterans' care and some bipartisan defense measures while opposing broader defense authorization packages. On environmental and energy policy, his low yea rate (35.3%) largely reflects opposition to measures that would roll back environmental regulations, such as congressional disapproval resolutions targeting EPA rules. He voted in favor of water resource development and ratepayer protection measures. His voting in areas like immigration (25% yea), housing (12.5% yea), and criminal justice (30.8% yea) suggests consistent opposition to the majority party's legislative approach in these areas. Meanwhile, he has been strongly supportive of labor-related measures (80% yea) and education legislation (63.6% yea).

Key Positions

  • •Voted to protect Medicaid and lower healthcare premiums, supporting motions related to the Do No Harm in Medicaid Act and the Lower Health Care Premiums for All Americans Act in December 2025.
  • •Opposed the congressional budget resolution for fiscal year 2027 and the continuing appropriations measure in July 2026, reflecting disagreement with the majority party's spending priorities.
  • •Voted against the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2027, but supported the Take Care of America's Veterans Act and a War Powers Resolution directing removal of U.S. forces from Lebanon.
  • •Opposed a congressional resolution to disapprove an EPA rule related to California harbor craft pollution standards, effectively siding with the environmental regulation remaining in place.
  • •Voted in favor of the Ratepayer Protection Act and Water Resources Development Act, supporting consumer and infrastructure-oriented energy and water measures.
  • •Supported labor-related legislation in 4 out of 5 recorded votes, indicating strong alignment with worker-protection measures.
  • •Opposed the majority of immigration-related measures brought to the floor, voting yea on only 2 of 8 immigration bills.
  • •Voted in favor of the Retire through Ownership Act while opposing the National Fraud Enforcement Division Act and the PROOF Act in September 2026.

By Policy Area

Other276
58% yea8% other34% nay
Healthcare35
80% yea20% nay
Environment & Energy34
35% yea3% other62% nay
Budget & Spending29
21% yea3% other76% nay
Defense28
61% yea3% other36% nay
Criminal Justice13
31% yea7% other62% nay
Education11
64% yea36% nay
Foreign Policy11
64% yea27% other9% nay
Taxation11
64% yea9% other27% nay
Agriculture10
60% yea40% nay
Technology10
30% yea30% other40% nay
Immigration8
25% yea12% other63% nay
Housing8
13% yea12% other75% nay
Infrastructure5
40% yea20% other40% nay
Labor5
80% yea20% nay

Analysis updated: September 18, 2026

Campaign Finance

Follow the Money

Includes all authorized campaign committees (principal committee, joint fundraising, and other authorized committees). Outside spending by Super PACs and independent groups is shown separately below.

Verify on FEC.gov →

Career: $8.2M

Fundraising Over Time

Raised per election cycleSpent

Contribution Sources

Individual$651K

56%

PAC / Committees$521K

44%

Party Committee$32.68

0%

Individual Breakdown

Itemized (>$200)

$639K

Small Dollar (<$200)

$12K

Donation Sizes

Under $200
$16K · 3%
$200 – 499
$29K · 4%
$500 – 999
$83K · 13%
$1,000 – 1,999
$153K · 23%
$2,000+
$369K · 57%

Share of individual contribution dollars by donation size, current election cycle.

Where the Money Comes From

In-state (CA)$428K · 67%
Out-of-state$211K · 33%

Itemized individual contributions only (donations over $200 report the donor's state). Small-dollar donations are not included because the FEC does not itemize them.

CA (home)
$428K
DC
$42K
TX
$37K
VA
$19K
OK
$14K
MI
$10K
MA
$10K
NY
$9K

Top Contributors

See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded

Top Contributing Industries

Top Donor Employers

NOT EMPLOYED$135K
SELF-EMPLOYED$65K
NULL$13K
ANDREESSEN HOROWITZ$10K
MOELIS & COMPANY$9K
LINEAR CITY DEVELOPMENT LLC$9K
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES$8K
MANUEL GONZALES PC$8K
MERCURY PUBLIC AFFAIRS$8K
GDML$7K
MILLER BARONDESS$7K
PIVOTAL VENTURES$7K

Employer as self-reported by itemized donors. “Not Employed” and “Self-Employed” typically rank highest for small-dollar campaigns and include retirees.

Where the Money Goes

Spending by Purpose

Other / Uncategorized
$371K
Fundraising
$50K
Administrative
$21K
Events
$20K
Advertising
$13K
Materials
$3K
Refunds
$1K

Purpose categories are self-reported on FEC filings; large “Other” totals are common.

Top Payees

1.

CAPITOL COMPLIANCE ASSOCIATES, INC.

$69K
2.

HM CONSULTING, LTD.

$53K
3.

NM MARKETING

$39K
4.

GOODWIN SIMON STRATEGIC RESEARCH, INC.

$38K
5.

AMERICAN EXPRESS

$33K
6.

BLUE WAVE POLITICAL PARTNERS

$32K
7.

NGP VAN, INC.

$29K
8.

SHUTMAN, NATE

$28K

Detailed Breakdown

Expenditures

Operating Costs

$470K

Operating Offsets

$2K

Net Operating

$467K

Refunds

Individual Refunds

$250

Committee Refunds

$1K

Outside Spending (Super PACs)

Supporting

$5.7M

Opposing

$12K

Total Outside Spending

$5.7M

Top Outside Spenders

01

UNITED DEMOCRACY PROJECT ('UDP')

+$3.4M
$3.4M
02

PROTECT PROGRESS

+$1.0M
$1.0M
03

LATINO VICTORY FUND

+$668K
$668K
04

BOLD AMERICA

+$223K
$223K
05

MIDDLE CLASS VALUES PAC

+$124K
$124K
06

AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES AFL-CIO

+$74K
$74K
07

LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEMOCRATIC CENTRAL COMMITTEE

+$37K-$12K
$49K
08

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE

+$25K
$25K

Independent expenditures are made without coordination with the candidate. Source: FEC Schedule E filings.

Coverage: 1/1/2025 – 6/30/2026FEC: H8CA34266Updated: 8/12/2026Source: FEC.gov (all authorized committees)
Jimmy Gomez — U.S. Representative for California 34: Voting Record & Donors | True Vote