Skip to content
Official portrait of Jay Obernolte, U.S. Representative for California

U.S. Representative

Jay Obernolte

California District 23

RepublicanConservative

Votes on Record

484

across 19 categories

Write Letter

Contact

202-225-5861Official Website

2433 Rayburn House Office Building Washington DC 20515-0523

Voting Profile

Legislative Record

484 votes analyzed

Most Active Policy Areas

#1 other#2 environment energy#3 budget#4 defense#5 healthcare

484

Votes Analyzed

Data sources: voteview, congress.gov

Political Position

Ideology Spectrum

0.32Conservative

Jay Obernolte's voting record places him in the conservative range of the political spectrum, with a NOMINATE ideology score of 0.315 on a scale from -1 (most liberal) to +1 (most conservative). However, he is notably more moderate than the average House Republican, whose score sits around 0.52. This means that while he generally aligns with conservative positions, he crosses party lines more frequently than many of his Republican colleagues.

LiberalModerateConservative
Republican avg

More liberal than the average Republican (0.52)

Data source: VoteView NOMINATE scores (UCLA/UC San Diego)

Policy Positions

Category Breakdown

484

total votes analyzed

Overview

Jay Obernolte is a Republican U.S. Representative from California whose voting record reflects a center-right approach across most policy areas. He has cast 484 recorded votes, showing strong support for legislation related to technology, criminal justice, taxation, and energy policy, while frequently opposing bills in the areas of labor, healthcare expansion, and foreign policy interventions. On fiscal matters, Obernolte has consistently supported budget proposals and tax legislation favored by his party, voting in favor of the fiscal year 2027 budget resolution and continuing appropriations measures. He has also voted in favor of most housing and infrastructure bills that came to the floor. His record on defense and military matters is more mixed, with a 60% support rate that reflects some willingness to diverge from party positions on issues like military deployments abroad. Obernolte stands out for his strong support of technology-related legislation, voting in favor of 90% of technology bills — a pattern consistent with his background and his representation of a California district. He has also voted in favor of the vast majority of criminal justice and environmental or energy bills brought to the floor, though many of the energy votes reflect support for rolling back environmental regulations rather than expanding protections. His voting record on social issues is limited but telling: he cast a single recorded vote against a reproductive rights measure, and he opposed several Democratic-led healthcare proposals including motions related to Medicaid protections and lowering health insurance premiums. On labor issues, he voted against four out of five bills, suggesting opposition to expanded worker protections or union-related measures.

Key Positions

  • •Consistently supports technology legislation, voting in favor of 9 out of 10 technology bills — reflecting both his California district and a personal focus on tech policy.
  • •Voted in favor of the fiscal year 2027 budget resolution and continuing appropriations, supporting his party's spending priorities.
  • •Opposed Democratic healthcare initiatives, voting against motions related to the Do No Harm in Medicaid Act and the Lower Health Care Premiums for All Americans Act in December 2025.
  • •Supported Congressional Review Act disapprovals of EPA regulations, including a vote to block California harbor craft emission standards, aligning with his party's approach to environmental regulation.
  • •Voted against War Powers Resolution measures that would have directed the removal of U.S. Armed Forces from Lebanon, supporting broader presidential military authority.
  • •Opposed most labor-related legislation, voting against 4 out of 5 labor bills brought to the floor.
  • •Supported all three banking and finance bills and most housing legislation (7 of 8 votes), suggesting openness to financial and housing policy measures.
  • •Cast his single recorded reproductive rights vote as a Nay, opposing the measure in question.

By Policy Area

Other277
73% yea4% other23% nay
Environment & Energy34
94% yea6% nay
Budget & Spending26
81% yea4% other15% nay
Defense25
60% yea40% nay
Healthcare23
39% yea61% nay
Criminal Justice13
92% yea8% other0% nay
Taxation11
91% yea9% nay
Foreign Policy11
36% yea64% nay
Education10
70% yea30% nay
Technology10
90% yea10% other0% nay
Agriculture9
56% yea44% nay
Immigration8
63% yea38% nay
Housing8
88% yea13% nay
Infrastructure5
80% yea20% nay
Labor5
20% yea80% nay

Analysis updated: September 18, 2026

Campaign Finance

Follow the Money

Includes all authorized campaign committees (principal committee, joint fundraising, and other authorized committees). Outside spending by Super PACs and independent groups is shown separately below.

Verify on FEC.gov →

Career: $6.1M

Fundraising Over Time

Raised per election cycleSpent

Contribution Sources

Individual$499K

37%

PAC / Committees$863K

63%

Individual Breakdown

Itemized (>$200)

$497K

Small Dollar (<$200)

$1K

Donation Sizes

Under $200
$3K · 0%
$200 – 499
$5K · 1%
$500 – 999
$51K · 9%
$1,000 – 1,999
$87K · 16%
$2,000+
$415K · 74%

Share of individual contribution dollars by donation size, current election cycle.

Where the Money Comes From

In-state (CA)$272K · 49%
Out-of-state$288K · 51%

Itemized individual contributions only (donations over $200 report the donor's state). Small-dollar donations are not included because the FEC does not itemize them.

CA (home)
$272K
DC
$81K
VA
$57K
TX
$47K
OR
$28K
MD
$14K
NV
$9K
NY
$9K

Top Contributors

See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded

Top Contributing Industries

Top Donor Employers

NULL$131K
ANTHROPIC$28K
LIGHTHOUSE$21K
SELF EMPLOYED$20K
NONE$19K
ESRI$14K
ANDREESSEN HOROWITZ$14K
MEHLMAN CONSULTING$12K
INNOVATIVE FEDERAL STRATEGIES$12K
ANTHROPIC PBC$8K
ALIMETER CAPITOL$7K
ANDREESEN HOROWITZ$7K

Employer as self-reported by itemized donors. “Not Employed” and “Self-Employed” typically rank highest for small-dollar campaigns and include retirees.

Where the Money Goes

Spending by Purpose

Other / Uncategorized
$673K
Contributions
$81K
Fundraising
$47K
Refunds
$7K

Purpose categories are self-reported on FEC filings; large “Other” totals are common.

Top Payees

1.

GRAND VALLEY CONSULTING LLC

$227K
2.

CHAINBRIDGE BANK

$130K
3.

NO ON PROP 50 STOP SACRAMENTO

$100K
4.

NRCC

$80K
5.

MINUTEMAN PRESS

$62K
6.

RKS STRATEGIES

$41K
7.

PROFESSIONAL DATA SERVICES

$40K
8.

CAPITOL HILL CLUB

$26K

Detailed Breakdown

Expenditures

Operating Costs

$621K

Operating Offsets

$571.33

Net Operating

$621K

Refunds

Individual Refunds

$7K

Outside Spending (Super PACs)

Supporting

$418K

Opposing

$22K

Total Outside Spending

$440K

Top Outside Spenders

01

PEOPLE FOR BETTER GOVERNMENT COMMITTEE OF THE SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

+$383K
$383K
02

FIX CONGRESS NOW!

+$32K
$32K
03

EQUALITY CALIFORNIA VOTES

-$22K
$22K
04

ALLIANCE FOR PHARMACY COMPOUNDING PAC (COMP PAC)

+$3K
$3K
05

REFORM LEADERS PAC

+$157.29
$157.29
06

PLANNED PARENTHOOD VOTES

-$123.73
$123.73

Independent expenditures are made without coordination with the candidate. Source: FEC Schedule E filings.

Coverage: 1/1/2025 – 6/30/2026FEC: H0CA08135Updated: 8/12/2026Source: FEC.gov (all authorized committees)