Skip to content
Official portrait of Jared Huffman, U.S. Representative for California

U.S. Representative

Jared Huffman

California District 2

DemocratProgressive

Votes on Record

544

across 19 categories

Write Letter

Contact

202-225-5161Official Website

2330 Rayburn House Office Building Washington DC 20515-0502

Voting Profile

Legislative Record

544 votes analyzed

Most Active Policy Areas

#1 other#2 healthcare#3 environment energy#4 defense#5 budget

544

Votes Analyzed

Data sources: voteview, congress.gov

Political Position

Ideology Spectrum

-0.43Progressive

Jared Huffman's NOMINATE score of -0.431 places him to the left of the average House Democrat (-0.380), meaning he votes in a more progressive direction than most members of his own party. In practical terms, he consistently supports expanding government programs, environmental protections, and social spending while opposing measures to reduce federal regulation or cut domestic budgets. He falls within the progressive wing of the Democratic Party but is not at the furthest end of the ideological spectrum.

LiberalModerateConservative
Democrat avg

Near the average for Democrats (-0.38)

Data source: VoteView NOMINATE scores (UCLA/UC San Diego)

Policy Positions

Category Breakdown

544

total votes analyzed

Overview

Jared Huffman is a Democratic member of the U.S. House of Representatives from California with a substantial voting record of 544 recorded votes. His record shows consistent support for healthcare access, environmental regulation, education funding, labor protections, and foreign engagement, while he regularly opposes Republican-led budget proposals and measures to roll back environmental standards. In healthcare, Huffman has voted in favor of motions to protect Medicaid and lower insurance premiums. On the environment and energy, he tends to oppose efforts to block Environmental Protection Agency rules — including voting against a resolution that would have disapproved of California's harbor craft pollution standards — while supporting water resources legislation. His defense-related votes show support for veterans' care and engagement with War Powers Resolution debates, indicating attention to both military personnel welfare and congressional oversight of armed conflict. On fiscal matters, Huffman has opposed most recent budget resolutions and continuing appropriations measures, which is consistent with Democratic opposition to Republican spending frameworks. He has supported taxation measures at a higher rate than budget proposals, suggesting he favors specific revenue approaches over broader spending blueprints put forward by the opposing party. His votes on labor issues show strong support, with 80% yea votes in that category, and he has backed education-related legislation at a 70% rate. Huffman's record across immigration, housing, technology, and agriculture shows more mixed voting patterns, reflecting the complexity of individual bills in those areas rather than a single ideological direction. His one recorded vote on reproductive rights was in favor, and his single civil rights vote was a nay — though with only one vote in each category, these do not establish a pattern.

Key Positions

  • •Consistently opposes Republican-led budget resolutions and continuing appropriations bills, voting nay on 81% of budget-related measures.
  • •Supports healthcare access legislation, including voting yea on motions related to the Do No Harm in Medicaid Act and the Lower Health Care Premiums for All Americans Act.
  • •Opposes rollbacks of environmental regulations, including voting against a resolution to disapprove of EPA rules on California harbor craft pollution standards.
  • •Supports veterans' welfare, voting yea on the Take Care of America's Veterans Act in July 2026.
  • •Engaged on congressional war powers, voting yea on a War Powers Resolution directing the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities in Lebanon.
  • •Strong supporter of labor-related legislation, voting yea on 80% of labor measures.
  • •Supports education-related bills at a 70% rate, one of his highest category approval rates.
  • •Voted yea on the Ratepayer Protection Act and the Water Resources Development Act, showing support for water infrastructure and energy consumer protections.

By Policy Area

Other279
59% yea3% other38% nay
Healthcare63
56% yea4% other40% nay
Environment & Energy34
35% yea65% nay
Defense32
69% yea3% other28% nay
Budget & Spending31
19% yea81% nay
Criminal Justice13
31% yea69% nay
Taxation12
67% yea33% nay
Agriculture11
45% yea10% other45% nay
Foreign Policy11
73% yea9% other18% nay
Education10
70% yea30% nay
Technology10
40% yea20% other40% nay
Housing9
44% yea56% nay
Immigration8
50% yea12% other38% nay
Banking & Finance5
20% yea80% nay
Labor5
80% yea20% nay
Infrastructure5
40% yea20% other40% nay

Analysis updated: September 18, 2026

Campaign Finance

Follow the Money

Includes all authorized campaign committees (principal committee, joint fundraising, and other authorized committees). Outside spending by Super PACs and independent groups is shown separately below.

Verify on FEC.gov →

Career: $8.3M

Fundraising Over Time

Raised per election cycleSpent

Contribution Sources

Individual$608K

66%

PAC / Committees$316K

34%

Individual Breakdown

Itemized (>$200)

$552K

Small Dollar (<$200)

$56K

Donation Sizes

Under $200
$89K · 15%
$200 – 499
$42K · 7%
$500 – 999
$53K · 9%
$1,000 – 1,999
$117K · 19%
$2,000+
$303K · 50%

Share of individual contribution dollars by donation size, current election cycle.

Where the Money Comes From

In-state (CA)$404K · 74%
Out-of-state$145K · 26%

Itemized individual contributions only (donations over $200 report the donor's state). Small-dollar donations are not included because the FEC does not itemize them.

CA (home)
$404K
OK
$20K
AZ
$17K
VA
$16K
WA
$15K
MI
$13K
OR
$10K
NY
$8K

Top Contributors

See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded

Top Contributing Industries

Top Donor Employers

N/A$204K
NULL$153K
MIGHTY ARROW FAMILY FOUNDATION$7K
REED INTERNATIONAL LTD$7K
PENULT PROJECTS INC.$7K
ALTSHULER BERZON LLP$7K
ENS RESOURCES INC.$6K
WRIGHT INSTITUTE$6K
TAMALPAIS UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT$6K
CBRE (COLDWELL BANKER RICHARD ELLIS GR$5K
MARIN SANITARY SERVICE$5K
BERGIN GLASS IMPRESSIONS INC$4K

Employer as self-reported by itemized donors. “Not Employed” and “Self-Employed” typically rank highest for small-dollar campaigns and include retirees.

Where the Money Goes

Spending by Purpose

Other / Uncategorized
$638K
Contributions
$167K
Fundraising
$44K
Administrative
$13K
Advertising
$11K
Refunds
$7K
Materials
$6K
Travel
$329.79

Purpose categories are self-reported on FEC filings; large “Other” totals are common.

Top Payees

1.

DEMOCRATIC CONGRESSIONAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE

$150K
2.

HOWLAND, ELIZABETH

$117K
3.

CHASE CARD SERVICES

$89K
4.

COMPETE DIGITAL LLC

$67K
5.

KIELOCH CONSULTING

$46K
6.

BLUE WAVE POLITICAL PARTNERS, LLC

$39K
7.

NGP VAN, INC.

$37K
8.

S.E. OWENS & COMPANY

$36K

Detailed Breakdown

Expenditures

Operating Costs

$696K

Operating Offsets

$2K

Net Operating

$694K

Refunds

Individual Refunds

$7K

Outside Spending (Super PACs)

Supporting

$7K

Opposing

$0

Total Outside Spending

$7K

Top Outside Spenders

01

COURAGE CALIFORNIA SUPER PAC

+$3K
$3K
02

ENVIRONMENT CALIFORNIA INC

+$2K
$2K
03

TOGETHER WE THRIVE

+$750
$750
04

SONOMA COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY

+$709.51
$709.51
05

HUMANE SOCIETY LEGISLATIVE FUND

+$491.69
$491.69
06

J STREET

+$440.13
$440.13
07

ENVIRONMENT AMERICA ACTION FUND

+$240.01
$240.01
08

PLANNED PARENTHOOD VOTES

+$123.73
$123.73

Independent expenditures are made without coordination with the candidate. Source: FEC Schedule E filings.

Coverage: 1/1/2025 – 6/30/2026FEC: H2CA06259Updated: 8/12/2026Source: FEC.gov (all authorized committees)