Skip to content
Official portrait of James A. Himes, U.S. Representative for Connecticut

U.S. Representative

James A. Himes

Connecticut District 4

DemocratModerate Liberal

Votes on Record

593

across 19 categories

Write Letter

Contact

202-225-5541Official Website

2137 Rayburn House Office Building Washington DC 20515-0704

Voting Profile

Legislative Record

593 votes analyzed

Most Active Policy Areas

#1 other#2 healthcare#3 environment energy#4 budget#5 defense

593

Votes Analyzed

Data sources: voteview, congress.gov

Political Position

Ideology Spectrum

-0.24Moderate Liberal

Rep. James A. Himes holds a moderate liberal position within the Democratic Party. His NOMINATE ideology score of -0.241 places him notably closer to the political center than the average House Democrat (approximately -0.380), indicating he is one of the more centrist members of his party. This positioning suggests he sometimes breaks from the Democratic mainstream on certain issues while still generally aligning with the party's broader policy direction.

LiberalModerateConservative
Democrat avg

More conservative than the average Democrat (-0.38)

Data source: VoteView NOMINATE scores (UCLA/UC San Diego)

Policy Positions

Category Breakdown

593

total votes analyzed

Overview

James A. Himes represents Connecticut in the U.S. House of Representatives as a Democrat. With 593 recorded votes across a wide range of policy areas, his record reflects a legislator who generally supports his party's positions but does so from a moderate stance. His voting patterns show particular engagement in healthcare, defense, and environmental and energy policy. On defense and foreign policy, Himes has shown strong support, voting in favor of measures like the National Defense Authorization Act and veterans' care legislation. He voted yea on all 11 foreign policy measures in the dataset, and supported 74.2% of defense-related votes, suggesting a posture that favors maintaining U.S. military readiness and international engagement. He also supported the War Powers Resolution measure directing the President to remove forces from hostilities in Lebanon, reflecting an interest in congressional oversight of military action. On domestic policy, Himes has frequently supported healthcare and education measures, voting yea on roughly 62% and 73% of bills in those areas respectively. He backed labor-related legislation at a high rate (83.3%) and supported taxation measures at 61.5%. In contrast, he opposed the majority of budget resolutions in the dataset (voting yea only 21.9% of the time), including the fiscal year 2027 budget resolution and continuing appropriations, reflecting disagreement with the spending frameworks put forward during this period. His record on environmental and energy votes shows a mixed pattern, with a 31.4% yea rate. He voted against a measure disapproving EPA regulations on California harbor craft emissions while supporting the Water Resources Development Act and the Ratepayer Protection Act. On banking and finance, despite representing a state with significant financial sector presence, he voted nay on the majority of recorded banking measures (71.4%).

Key Positions

  • •Voted in favor of all 11 foreign policy measures on record, showing consistent support for U.S. international engagement.
  • •Supported the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2027 and veterans' care legislation, while also voting to direct the President to remove forces from hostilities in Lebanon under the War Powers Resolution.
  • •Opposed the fiscal year 2027 budget resolution and the continuing appropriations measure, voting against the majority of budget bills in the dataset (yea on only 21.9%).
  • •Supported healthcare-related motions including the Do No Harm in Medicaid Act recommit motion and a motion related to the Lower Health Care Premiums for All Americans Act.
  • •Voted against an EPA regulatory disapproval resolution related to California harbor craft emissions standards, while supporting the Water Resources Development Act and the Ratepayer Protection Act.
  • •Supported labor-related legislation at a high rate, voting yea on 5 of 6 labor measures.
  • •Voted in favor of education-related bills at a 72.7% rate, backing 8 of 11 measures in the category.
  • •Opposed the majority of banking and finance measures on record, voting nay on 5 of 7 bills in that category.

By Policy Area

Other281
66% yea2% other32% nay
Healthcare94
62% yea38% nay
Environment & Energy35
31% yea3% other66% nay
Budget & Spending32
22% yea78% nay
Defense31
74% yea26% nay
Agriculture20
60% yea40% nay
Taxation13
62% yea7% other31% nay
Criminal Justice13
46% yea16% other38% nay
Education11
73% yea27% nay
Foreign Policy11
100% yea0% nay
Technology10
70% yea30% nay
Housing9
44% yea56% nay
Immigration8
50% yea50% nay
Banking & Finance7
29% yea71% nay
Labor6
83% yea17% nay
Social Security5
60% yea40% nay
Infrastructure5
60% yea40% nay

Analysis updated: September 18, 2026

Campaign Finance

Follow the Money

Includes all authorized campaign committees (principal committee, joint fundraising, and other authorized committees). Outside spending by Super PACs and independent groups is shown separately below.

Verify on FEC.gov →

Career: $24.3M

Fundraising Over Time

Raised per election cycleSpent

Contribution Sources

Individual$417K

33%

PAC / Committees$831K

67%

Individual Breakdown

Itemized (>$200)

$373K

Small Dollar (<$200)

$44K

Donation Sizes

Under $200
$68K · 16%
$200 – 499
$21K · 5%
$500 – 999
$31K · 7%
$1,000 – 1,999
$74K · 18%
$2,000+
$223K · 53%

Share of individual contribution dollars by donation size, current election cycle.

Where the Money Comes From

In-state (CT)$205K · 55%
Out-of-state$168K · 45%

Itemized individual contributions only (donations over $200 report the donor's state). Small-dollar donations are not included because the FEC does not itemize them.

CT (home)
$205K
NY
$60K
CA
$35K
VA
$15K
DC
$13K
MD
$12K
TN
$8K
FL
$7K

Top Contributors

See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded

Top Contributing Industries

Top Donor Employers

NOT EMPLOYED$84K
N/A$33K
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS$18K
APOLLO GLOBAL MANAGEMENT$14K
BLACKSTONE$11K
NONE$10K
SELF EMPLOYED$10K
LHP CAPITAL LLC$8K
FREE + FAIR LITIGATION GROUP$7K
ANDURIL INDUSTRIES$7K
SEAN N PARKER FOUNDATION$7K
DE SHAW$7K

Employer as self-reported by itemized donors. “Not Employed” and “Self-Employed” typically rank highest for small-dollar campaigns and include retirees.

Where the Money Goes

Spending by Purpose

Other / Uncategorized
$545K
Contributions
$270K
Transfers
$76K
Administrative
$24K
Fundraising
$20K
Materials
$19K
Advertising
$10K
Refunds
$4K

Purpose categories are self-reported on FEC filings; large “Other” totals are common.

Top Payees

1.

DCCC

$340K
2.

AMERICAN EXPRESS

$156K
3.

THE FROST GROUP

$132K
4.

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE (IRS)

$47K
5.

GUSTO

$39K
6.

JANNEY MONTGOMERY SCOTT LLC

$32K
7.

NGP VAN, INC.

$30K
8.

POLITICAL COMPLIANCE MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLC

$22K

Detailed Breakdown

Expenditures

Operating Costs

$591K

Operating Offsets

$101.31

Net Operating

$591K

Refunds

Individual Refunds

$4K

Outside Spending (Super PACs)

Supporting

$1.3M

Opposing

$169K

Total Outside Spending

$1.5M

Top Outside Spenders

01

DEMOCRATIC CONGRESSIONAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE

+$1.3M
$1.3M
02

LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS INC

+$72K
$72K
03

TRINITY PAC

-$64K
$64K
04

CONNECTICUT TAXPAYERS ALLIANCE

-$40K
$40K
05

COMMON SENSE FOR CONNECTICUT

-$39K
$39K
06

THE 60 PLUS ASSOCIATION

-$25K
$25K
07

CT WORKING FAMILIES FEDERAL PAC D/B/A TAKE BACK CONGRESS CT

+$1K
$1K

Independent expenditures are made without coordination with the candidate. Source: FEC Schedule E filings.

Coverage: 1/1/2025 – 6/30/2026FEC: H8CT04172Updated: 8/12/2026Source: FEC.gov (all authorized committees)
James A. Himes — U.S. Representative for Connecticut 4: Voting Record & Donors | True Vote