Skip to content
Official portrait of Jahana Hayes, U.S. Representative for Connecticut

U.S. Representative

Jahana Hayes

Connecticut District 5

DemocratProgressive

Votes on Record

495

across 19 categories

Write Letter

Contact

202-225-4476Official Website

2049 Rayburn House Office Building Washington DC 20515-0705

Voting Profile

Legislative Record

495 votes analyzed

Most Active Policy Areas

#1 other#2 environment energy#3 healthcare#4 budget#5 defense

495

Votes Analyzed

Data sources: voteview, congress.gov

Political Position

Ideology Spectrum

-0.34Progressive

Jahana Hayes holds a NOMINATE ideology score of -0.337 on a scale from -1 (most liberal) to +1 (most conservative), placing her in the progressive range. However, compared to the average House Democrat score of -0.380, she sits slightly closer to the political center than many of her party colleagues. This positions her as a mainstream Democrat who occasionally diverges from the most progressive wing of her caucus.

LiberalModerateConservative
Democrat avg

Near the average for Democrats (-0.38)

Data source: VoteView NOMINATE scores (UCLA/UC San Diego)

Policy Positions

Category Breakdown

495

total votes analyzed

Overview

Jahana Hayes represents Connecticut in the U.S. House of Representatives as a Democrat with 495 recorded votes. Her voting record shows strong and consistent support for healthcare legislation, labor protections, and foreign policy measures, while she frequently opposes budget proposals and environmental or energy bills that reach the House floor — a pattern common among Democrats voting against majority-party legislation designed to reduce regulations or reshape spending priorities. Her highest rates of support appear in foreign policy (90.9% Yea), labor (80% Yea), and healthcare (79.3% Yea), reflecting priorities around worker protections, access to medical care, and international engagement. She also shows solid support for education and agriculture legislation. Her lower Yea rates on environment and energy votes (32.4%), budget measures (24.1%), and housing bills (25%) largely reflect opposition to Republican-led proposals in those areas rather than opposition to environmental protection or housing programs themselves — for example, she voted against a resolution to disapprove EPA emissions regulations for California, effectively supporting the environmental standards in question. On defense, Hayes has a mixed record with 63% Yea votes, supporting veterans' care legislation like the Take Care of America's Veterans Act while opposing the fiscal year 2027 National Defense Authorization Act. Her approach to immigration and criminal justice legislation also shows selective engagement, supporting some measures while opposing others. Overall, Hayes votes with her party on most major issues but demonstrates enough independence to place her slightly to the right of the average House Democrat, suggesting a pragmatic approach shaped by her Connecticut constituency.

Key Positions

  • •Consistently supports healthcare access legislation, voting Yea on 79.3% of healthcare bills including motions related to the Do No Harm in Medicaid Act and the Lower Health Care Premiums for All Americans Act.
  • •Opposes rollbacks of environmental regulations — voted Nay on a resolution to disapprove EPA rules on California harbor craft emission standards, supporting the existing pollution controls.
  • •Strongly supports foreign policy engagement, voting Yea on 90.9% of foreign policy measures that came to a vote.
  • •Supports labor protections, voting Yea on 80% of labor-related legislation.
  • •Opposes Republican-authored budget proposals, voting Nay on the fiscal year 2027 congressional budget resolution and continuing appropriations measures.
  • •Supports veterans' services, voting Yea on the Take Care of America's Veterans Act while voting Nay on the broader National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2027.
  • •Voted to extend protections for the North Atlantic right whale by supporting an amendment to the Consolidated Appropriations Act, reflecting wildlife conservation priorities.
  • •Supports education funding and policy, voting Yea on 63.6% of education-related legislation.

By Policy Area

Other275
60% yea3% other37% nay
Environment & Energy34
32% yea3% other65% nay
Healthcare29
79% yea21% nay
Budget & Spending29
24% yea76% nay
Defense27
63% yea4% other33% nay
Criminal Justice13
38% yea62% nay
Education11
64% yea36% nay
Foreign Policy11
91% yea9% other0% nay
Taxation11
64% yea36% nay
Agriculture10
60% yea40% nay
Technology10
40% yea20% other40% nay
Housing8
25% yea12% other63% nay
Immigration8
38% yea63% nay
Infrastructure5
60% yea40% nay
Labor5
80% yea20% nay

Analysis updated: September 18, 2026

Campaign Finance

Follow the Money

Includes all authorized campaign committees (principal committee, joint fundraising, and other authorized committees). Outside spending by Super PACs and independent groups is shown separately below.

Verify on FEC.gov →

Career: $12.2M

Fundraising Over Time

Raised per election cycleSpent

Contribution Sources

Individual$611K

51%

PAC / Committees$574K

48%

Party Committee$4K

0%

Individual Breakdown

Itemized (>$200)

$459K

Small Dollar (<$200)

$151K

Donation Sizes

Under $200
$205K · 30%
$200 – 499
$56K · 8%
$500 – 999
$57K · 8%
$1,000 – 1,999
$93K · 13%
$2,000+
$281K · 41%

Share of individual contribution dollars by donation size, current election cycle.

Where the Money Comes From

In-state (CT)$125K · 23%
Out-of-state$416K · 77%

Itemized individual contributions only (donations over $200 report the donor's state). Small-dollar donations are not included because the FEC does not itemize them.

CA
$128K
CT (home)
$125K
NY
$75K
MA
$57K
TX
$28K
MD
$15K
NJ
$13K
FL
$11K

Top Contributors

See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded

Top Contributing Industries

Top Donor Employers

NOT EMPLOYED$260K
SELF EMPLOYED$30K
NULL$9K
BAIN CAPITAL$7K
PUMA SPRINGS VINEYARDS$7K
LAW OFFICES OF R. STEPHEN MCNALLY$7K
THE BAUPOST GROUP$7K
GIVE FORWARD FOUNDATION$7K
THE HARNISCH FOUNDATION$7K
THE RING GROUP$7K
STREAM LINE CIRCLE LLC$7K
ARENA DESTINATION MARKETING$7K

Employer as self-reported by itemized donors. “Not Employed” and “Self-Employed” typically rank highest for small-dollar campaigns and include retirees.

Where the Money Goes

Spending by Purpose

Other / Uncategorized
$679K
Administrative
$25K
Refunds
$9K
Contributions
$4K
Materials
$3K
Advertising
$3K
Transfers
$1K
Fundraising
$456.72

Purpose categories are self-reported on FEC filings; large “Other” totals are common.

Top Payees

1.

THOMPSON, CHANITA G

$136K
2.

AMERICAN EXPRESS CARD

$117K
3.

AUTHENTIC CAMPAIGNS

$97K
4.

ADP

$83K
5.

KIELOCH CONSULTING INC

$70K
6.

TORRES, JASMINE

$38K
7.

EMILY'S LIST

$32K
8.

CURRY, EVA

$19K

Detailed Breakdown

Expenditures

Operating Costs

$711K

Operating Offsets

$6K

Net Operating

$705K

Refunds

Individual Refunds

$4K

Committee Refunds

$5K

Outside Spending (Super PACs)

Supporting

$4.0M

Opposing

$3.2M

Total Outside Spending

$7.2M

Top Outside Spenders

01

CONGRESSIONAL LEADERSHIP FUND

-$2.6M
$2.6M
02

DCCC

+$1.5M
$1.5M
03

NEA ADVOCACY FUND

+$916K
$916K
04

LCV VICTORY FUND

+$658K
$658K
05

NRCC

-$531K
$531K
06

CONGRESSIONAL BLACK CAUCUS PAC

+$307K
$307K
07

WFP NATIONAL PAC

+$170K
$170K
08

A NEW PROMISE

+$130K
$130K

Independent expenditures are made without coordination with the candidate. Source: FEC Schedule E filings.

Coverage: 1/1/2025 – 6/30/2026FEC: H8CT05245Updated: 8/12/2026Source: FEC.gov (all authorized committees)
Jahana Hayes — U.S. Representative for Connecticut 5: Voting Record & Donors | True Vote