Skip to content
Official portrait of J. Luis Correa, U.S. Representative for California

U.S. Representative

J. Luis Correa

California District 46

DemocratModerate Liberal

Votes on Record

510

across 19 categories

Write Letter

Contact

202-225-2965Official Website

2082 Rayburn House Office Building Washington DC 20515-0546

Voting Profile

Legislative Record

510 votes analyzed

Most Active Policy Areas

#1 other#2 healthcare#3 environment energy#4 budget#5 defense

510

Votes Analyzed

Data sources: voteview, congress.gov

Political Position

Ideology Spectrum

-0.28Moderate Liberal

Rep. J. Luis Correa's NOMINATE score of -0.285 places him in the moderate-liberal range of the political spectrum. He is notably more centrist than the average House Democrat, whose score sits around -0.380. This means he tends to vote with his party on most issues but occasionally breaks from the Democratic caucus, particularly on fiscal and regulatory matters.

LiberalModerateConservative
Democrat avg

Near the average for Democrats (-0.38)

Data source: VoteView NOMINATE scores (UCLA/UC San Diego)

Policy Positions

Category Breakdown

510

total votes analyzed

Overview

J. Luis Correa is a Democratic member of the U.S. House of Representatives from California with 510 recorded votes. His voting record reflects a moderate-liberal approach: he consistently supports Democratic priorities on healthcare, labor, infrastructure, and foreign policy, while showing more independent tendencies on budget, housing, immigration, and banking issues. On healthcare and taxation, Correa has voted in favor of his party's positions roughly 72-73% of the time, supporting measures like the Do No Harm in Medicaid Act and the Lower Health Care Premiums for All Americans Act. He has voted yes on all recorded infrastructure and labor bills, signaling consistent support for investment in public works and worker protections. His foreign policy record is also unanimously in the affirmative across 11 votes. Correa's more independent streak appears in budget and fiscal policy, where he voted yea only about 18% of the time — frequently opposing spending packages and continuing resolutions. He also voted nay on a majority of housing, immigration, and banking-related measures, suggesting a more cautious approach to government spending and regulation in those areas. On environment and energy, he voted yea about 35% of the time, supporting some measures like the Ratepayer Protection Act and Water Resources Development Act while opposing others. With 510 votes on record, Correa has a substantial legislative history that shows a legislator who generally aligns with his party but exercises independent judgment on fiscal and regulatory questions more often than the typical House Democrat.

Key Positions

  • •Voted unanimously in favor on all 11 foreign policy votes and all 5 infrastructure votes, indicating consistent support for international engagement and domestic infrastructure investment.
  • •Voted unanimously in favor on all 5 labor-related votes, showing steady support for worker-related legislation.
  • •Opposed most budget and appropriations measures, voting yea only 18% of the time — including voting against the fiscal year 2027 budget resolution and continuing appropriations.
  • •Supported healthcare legislation roughly 72% of the time, including voting for the Do No Harm in Medicaid Act and the Lower Health Care Premiums for All Americans Act.
  • •Opposed a congressional disapproval resolution targeting California's commercial harbor craft emissions regulations, voting to preserve the state's environmental standards.
  • •Voted in favor of the Take Care of America's Veterans Act but opposed the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2027, showing a selective approach to defense spending.
  • •Voted in favor of a War Powers Resolution directing removal of U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities in Lebanon, supporting congressional oversight of military deployments.
  • •Voted nay on most immigration-related measures, supporting only 25% of bills in that category.

By Policy Area

Other278
64% yea7% other29% nay
Healthcare39
72% yea28% nay
Environment & Energy34
35% yea3% other62% nay
Budget & Spending28
18% yea82% nay
Defense28
61% yea7% other32% nay
Criminal Justice13
54% yea46% nay
Education11
64% yea36% nay
Taxation11
73% yea27% nay
Foreign Policy11
100% yea0% nay
Agriculture10
60% yea40% nay
Technology10
50% yea10% other40% nay
Housing8
25% yea75% nay
Immigration8
25% yea12% other63% nay
Social Security5
60% yea40% nay
Infrastructure5
100% yea0% nay
Labor5
100% yea0% nay

Analysis updated: September 18, 2026

Campaign Finance

Follow the Money

Includes all authorized campaign committees (principal committee, joint fundraising, and other authorized committees). Outside spending by Super PACs and independent groups is shown separately below.

Verify on FEC.gov →

Career: $7.2M

Fundraising Over Time

Raised per election cycleSpent

Contribution Sources

Individual$417K

39%

PAC / Committees$666K

61%

Individual Breakdown

Itemized (>$200)

$413K

Small Dollar (<$200)

$4K

Donation Sizes

Under $200
$5K · 1%
$200 – 499
$7K · 2%
$500 – 999
$127K · 29%
$1,000 – 1,999
$104K · 24%
$2,000+
$197K · 45%

Share of individual contribution dollars by donation size, current election cycle.

Where the Money Comes From

In-state (CA)$292K · 67%
Out-of-state$144K · 33%

Itemized individual contributions only (donations over $200 report the donor's state). Small-dollar donations are not included because the FEC does not itemize them.

CA (home)
$292K
DC
$24K
VA
$16K
NY
$13K
TX
$11K
FL
$9K
NJ
$7K
MI
$6K

Top Contributors

See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded

Top Contributing Industries

Top Donor Employers

NULL$39K
NOT EMPLOYED$33K
KKR & CO INC$20K
IRVING CHASE$7K
PHILATRON$7K
SA RECYCLING$7K
ACT$7K
RETIRED$7K
GUARANTY CHEVROLET$5K
TEHMINA AFZAL$5K
SANDERSON J RAY DEVELOPMENT$5K
CARGO SOLUTIONS$5K

Employer as self-reported by itemized donors. “Not Employed” and “Self-Employed” typically rank highest for small-dollar campaigns and include retirees.

Where the Money Goes

Spending by Purpose

Other / Uncategorized
$581K
Materials
$28K
Administrative
$2K
Refunds
$1K

Purpose categories are self-reported on FEC filings; large “Other” totals are common.

Top Payees

1.

THINK INC

$205K
2.

CITI CARDS

$171K
3.

HM CONSULTING

$81K
4.

MARTINEZ & ASSOCIATES, INC.

$44K
5.

CHASE CARDMEMBER SERVICE

$29K
6.

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE

$14K
7.

INTEGRATED SOLUTIONS: POLITICAL

$14K
8.

PROGRESSIVE STRATEGIES & CONSULTING LLC

$12K

Detailed Breakdown

Expenditures

Operating Costs

$612K

Operating Offsets

$16K

Net Operating

$596K

Refunds

Individual Refunds

$2K

Outside Spending (Super PACs)

Supporting

$772K

Opposing

$16K

Total Outside Spending

$788K

Top Outside Spenders

01

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS CONGRESSIONAL FUND

+$333K
$333K
02

LATINO VICTORY FUND

+$213K
$213K
03

AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION

+$150K
$150K
04

COOPERATIVE OF AMERICAN PHYSICIANS IE COMMITTEE

+$70K
$70K
05

CONSUMERS FOR RESPONSIBLE GOVERNMENT

-$16K
$16K
06

PIVOT ELECTION

+$3K
$3K
07

COURAGE CALIFORNIA SUPER PAC

+$2K
$2K
08

TOGETHER WE THRIVE

+$750
$750

Independent expenditures are made without coordination with the candidate. Source: FEC Schedule E filings.

Coverage: 1/1/2025 – 6/30/2026FEC: H6CA46116Updated: 8/12/2026Source: FEC.gov (all authorized committees)