Skip to content
Official portrait of Greg Stanton, U.S. Representative for Arizona

U.S. Representative

Greg Stanton

Arizona District 4

DemocratModerate Liberal

Votes on Record

495

across 19 categories

Write Letter

Contact

202-225-9888Official Website

207 Cannon House Office Building Washington DC 20515-0304

Voting Profile

Legislative Record

495 votes analyzed

Most Active Policy Areas

#1 other#2 environment energy#3 healthcare#4 budget#5 defense

495

Votes Analyzed

Data sources: voteview, congress.gov

Political Position

Ideology Spectrum

-0.28Moderate Liberal

Greg Stanton's NOMINATE score of -0.278 places him as a moderate liberal within the Democratic Party. The average House Democrat scores around -0.380, meaning Stanton votes more conservatively than most members of his party. In practical terms, he generally supports Democratic priorities but is more willing than many of his colleagues to break from the party position on certain issues.

LiberalModerateConservative
Democrat avg

More conservative than the average Democrat (-0.38)

Data source: VoteView NOMINATE scores (UCLA/UC San Diego)

Policy Positions

Category Breakdown

495

total votes analyzed

Overview

Greg Stanton is a Democratic U.S. Representative from Arizona whose voting record reflects a moderate-liberal position within his party. Across 495 recorded votes, he consistently supports legislation related to healthcare, labor protections, infrastructure investment, and foreign policy. He has voted in favor of every foreign policy and labor measure that came before him during this period. On fiscal issues, Stanton has frequently voted against budget resolutions and continuing appropriations measures, which is consistent with Democratic opposition to Republican-led spending frameworks. He opposed the fiscal year 2027 budget resolution and related continuing resolutions. In healthcare, he supported motions related to Medicaid protections and efforts to lower health care premiums, voting in favor of these measures roughly 79% of the time. Stanton's record on environment and energy is more nuanced than a simple party-line pattern would suggest. He voted against a congressional disapproval resolution targeting California's harbor craft emissions standards, siding with maintaining environmental regulations, but his overall yea rate in this category is just 32%, reflecting opposition to several energy-related measures. On immigration and housing, he voted against the majority of measures that came to the floor, with yea rates of 25% and 37.5% respectively. His defense voting pattern shows support for veterans' services alongside engagement with war powers questions. He voted for the Take Care of America's Veterans Act and supported a War Powers Resolution measure directing the removal of U.S. forces from hostilities in Lebanon, while opposing a similar but differently scoped Lebanon withdrawal measure — suggesting attention to the specific terms of each proposal rather than a blanket position.

Key Positions

  • •Voted in favor of all 11 foreign policy measures and all 5 labor measures that came to the floor, showing consistent support in both areas.
  • •Supported healthcare legislation roughly 79% of the time, including voting for Medicaid protections and measures aimed at lowering health care premiums.
  • •Opposed most budget resolutions and continuing appropriations bills, voting nay on 76% of budget-related measures including the fiscal year 2027 budget resolution.
  • •Voted against 75% of immigration-related measures that reached the floor, with only 2 yea votes out of 8 total.
  • •Supported infrastructure spending at an 80% rate, voting yea on 4 of 5 infrastructure measures.
  • •Voted against a congressional resolution that would have disapproved California's harbor craft emissions standards, siding with maintaining the environmental regulation.
  • •Supported the Take Care of America's Veterans Act and engaged with War Powers Resolution measures regarding U.S. military involvement in Lebanon.
  • •Voted in favor of technology-related legislation 70% of the time, including 7 yea votes out of 10 measures.

By Policy Area

Other276
66% yea4% other30% nay
Environment & Energy34
32% yea3% other65% nay
Healthcare29
79% yea21% nay
Budget & Spending29
24% yea76% nay
Defense26
65% yea4% other31% nay
Criminal Justice13
62% yea7% other31% nay
Education11
64% yea36% nay
Foreign Policy11
100% yea0% nay
Taxation11
73% yea27% nay
Agriculture10
60% yea40% nay
Technology10
70% yea30% nay
Immigration8
25% yea75% nay
Housing8
38% yea63% nay
Infrastructure5
80% yea20% nay
Labor5
100% yea0% nay

Analysis updated: September 18, 2026

Campaign Finance

Follow the Money

Includes all authorized campaign committees (principal committee, joint fundraising, and other authorized committees). Outside spending by Super PACs and independent groups is shown separately below.

Verify on FEC.gov →

Career: $13.8M

Fundraising Over Time

Raised per election cycleSpent

Contribution Sources

Individual$1.5M

70%

PAC / Committees$639K

30%

Party Committee$37.68

0%

Individual Breakdown

Itemized (>$200)

$1.4M

Small Dollar (<$200)

$91K

Donation Sizes

Under $200
$138K · 9%
$200 – 499
$88K · 6%
$500 – 999
$227K · 15%
$1,000 – 1,999
$342K · 23%
$2,000+
$688K · 46%

Share of individual contribution dollars by donation size, current election cycle.

Where the Money Comes From

In-state (AZ)$1.2M · 86%
Out-of-state$201K · 14%

Itemized individual contributions only (donations over $200 report the donor's state). Small-dollar donations are not included because the FEC does not itemize them.

AZ (home)
$1.2M
CA
$79K
DC
$22K
VA
$20K
TX
$17K
MA
$8K
KY
$7K
OK
$7K

Top Contributors

See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded

Top Contributing Industries

Top Donor Employers

NOT EMPLOYED$329K
SELF$99K
SELF EMPLOYED$56K
NULL$30K
NONE$30K
N/A$15K
PERKINS COIE$11K
SRP$11K
ANDURIL INDUSTRIES$11K
RETIRED$10K
SNELL & WILMER$10K
ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE$9K

Employer as self-reported by itemized donors. “Not Employed” and “Self-Employed” typically rank highest for small-dollar campaigns and include retirees.

Where the Money Goes

Spending by Purpose

Other / Uncategorized
$715K
Contributions
$244K
Advertising
$86K
Materials
$25K
Fundraising
$18K
Administrative
$14K
Refunds
$8K
Travel
$325.84

Purpose categories are self-reported on FEC filings; large “Other” totals are common.

Top Payees

1.

DEMOCRATIC CONGRESSIONAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE - CONTRIBUTIONS

$170K
2.

ADAMS, CAMERON

$116K
3.

FROST GROUP

$86K
4.

RISING TIDE INTERACTIVE

$75K
5.

ADP

$70K
6.

TOMAS, JEAN RACHEL

$67K
7.

AMERICAN EXPRESS

$53K
8.

NGP VAN, INC.

$49K

Detailed Breakdown

Expenditures

Operating Costs

$854K

Operating Offsets

$458.01

Net Operating

$853K

Refunds

Individual Refunds

$8K

Outside Spending (Super PACs)

Supporting

$614K

Opposing

$222K

Total Outside Spending

$836K

Top Outside Spenders

01

HOUSE MAJORITY PAC

+$324K
$324K
02

UNITED WE CAN

+$147K
$147K
03

STOP STANTON PAC

-$131K
$131K
04

CONGRESSIONAL LEADERSHIP FUND

-$83K
$83K
05

SEIU COPE (SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION COMMITTEE ON POLITICAL EDUCATION)

+$49K
$49K
06

WORKING AMERICA

+$37K
$37K
07

NEXTGEN CLIMATE ACTION COMMITTEE

+$30K
$30K
08

FEMINIST MAJORITY

+$16K
$16K

Independent expenditures are made without coordination with the candidate. Source: FEC Schedule E filings.

Coverage: 1/1/2025 – 7/1/2026FEC: H8AZ09040Updated: 8/12/2026Source: FEC.gov (all authorized committees)
Greg Stanton — U.S. Representative for Arizona 4: Voting Record & Donors | True Vote