Skip to content
Official portrait of Gilbert Ray Cisneros, U.S. Representative for California

U.S. Representative

Gilbert Ray Cisneros

California District 31

DemocratProgressive

Votes on Record

463

across 19 categories

Write Letter

Contact

202-225-5256Official Website

2463 Rayburn House Office Building Washington DC 20515-0531

Voting Profile

Legislative Record

463 votes analyzed

Most Active Policy Areas

#1 other#2 environment energy#3 defense#4 budget#5 criminal justice

463

Votes Analyzed

Data sources: voteview, congress.gov

Political Position

Ideology Spectrum

-0.47Progressive

Gilbert Ray Cisneros is a Democrat from California whose voting record places him to the left of the average House Democrat. His NOMINATE ideology score of -0.472 is more liberal than the Democratic party average of approximately -0.380, indicating he consistently supports progressive policy positions across most issue areas.

LiberalModerateConservative
Democrat avg

Near the average for Democrats (-0.38)

Data source: VoteView NOMINATE scores (UCLA/UC San Diego)

Policy Positions

Category Breakdown

463

total votes analyzed

Overview

Rep. Cisneros compiled a voting record of 463 votes during his time in the U.S. House, reflecting a consistently progressive approach to legislation. His strongest areas of legislative activity included environment and energy policy, defense, and budget matters, where he cast the most recorded votes outside of general procedural business. On domestic policy, Cisneros showed strong support for healthcare legislation (voting yea on roughly 78% of healthcare bills), labor protections (80% yea), and social security measures (75% yea). He opposed most budget resolutions put forward during his tenure, voting nay on 85% of budget-related measures, which is consistent with Democrats opposing Republican-drafted spending plans. His foreign policy record stands out as notably bipartisan, with yea votes on over 90% of foreign policy measures that came to the floor. On defense, Cisneros took a mixed approach, supporting about 58% of defense-related legislation. He voted yea on veterans' care bills such as the Take Care of America's Veterans Act and supported War Powers Resolution measures to limit military deployments, while voting against the FY2027 National Defense Authorization Act. His environment and energy votes skewed heavily toward opposing rollbacks of environmental regulations, including voting against congressional disapproval of California's harbor craft pollution standards. Cisneros also engaged with technology, education, and infrastructure legislation, generally supporting measures in those areas. His record on immigration was evenly split, and he opposed most housing-related bills that came to the floor during his tenure.

Key Positions

  • •Consistently opposed Republican-drafted budget and appropriations bills, voting nay on 85% of budget measures, including the FY2027 budget resolution and continuing appropriations.
  • •Strongly supported healthcare legislation, voting yea on about 78% of healthcare bills that reached the floor.
  • •Supported labor protections at a high rate, voting yea on 80% of labor-related measures.
  • •Voted to support War Powers Resolution measures directing the removal of U.S. forces from hostilities in Lebanon, while opposing the FY2027 National Defense Authorization Act.
  • •Defended California's environmental standards by voting against congressional disapproval of EPA rules related to the state's harbor craft pollution regulations.
  • •Showed strong bipartisan engagement on foreign policy, supporting over 90% of foreign policy measures.
  • •Supported the Ratepayer Protection Act and Water Resources Development Act on energy and environmental matters.
  • •Voted against the impeachment of President Trump in the criminal justice category.

By Policy Area

Other271
66% yea1% other33% nay
Environment & Energy34
35% yea65% nay
Defense26
58% yea42% nay
Budget & Spending26
15% yea85% nay
Criminal Justice13
38% yea62% nay
Foreign Policy11
91% yea9% nay
Taxation11
55% yea9% other36% nay
Education10
60% yea40% nay
Technology10
70% yea30% nay
Healthcare9
78% yea22% nay
Immigration8
50% yea50% nay
Housing8
25% yea75% nay
Agriculture7
57% yea43% nay
Labor5
80% yea20% nay
Infrastructure5
60% yea40% nay

Analysis updated: September 18, 2026

Campaign Finance

Follow the Money

Includes all authorized campaign committees (principal committee, joint fundraising, and other authorized committees). Outside spending by Super PACs and independent groups is shown separately below.

Verify on FEC.gov →

Career: $17.5M

Fundraising Over Time

Raised per election cycleSpent

Contribution Sources

Individual$2.2M

94%

PAC / Committees$84K

4%

Party Committee$2K

0%

Self-Funded$53K

2%

Individual Breakdown

Itemized (>$200)

$1.6M

Small Dollar (<$200)

$569K

Donation Sizes

Under $200
$26K · 11%
$200 – 499
$12K · 5%
$500 – 999
$26K · 11%
$1,000 – 1,999
$71K · 29%
$2,000+
$105K · 44%

Share of individual contribution dollars by donation size, current election cycle.

Where the Money Comes From

In-state (CA)$133K · 61%
Out-of-state$83K · 39%

Itemized individual contributions only (donations over $200 report the donor's state). Small-dollar donations are not included because the FEC does not itemize them.

CA (home)
$133K
DC
$21K
NY
$11K
VA
$9K
FL
$7K
AZ
$7K
UT
$5K
MD
$4K

Top Contributors

See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded

Top Contributing Industries

Top Donor Employers

NOT EMPLOYED$63K
SELF EMPLOYED$18K
NULL$13K
GROUND CONTROL BUSINESS MANAGEMENT$7K
RING GROUP$7K
CAPITAL GROUP$5K
BRIAN GLACKIN & ASSOCIATES$5K
PHILLIPS 66$4K
ALSOP LOUIE PARTNERS$4K
WINDOW WORLD$4K
RAAM CONSTRUCTION INC$4K
PDT PARTNERS$4K

Employer as self-reported by itemized donors. “Not Employed” and “Self-Employed” typically rank highest for small-dollar campaigns and include retirees.

Where the Money Goes

Spending by Purpose

Other / Uncategorized
$322K
Administrative
$140K
Fundraising
$10K
Advertising
$5K
Materials
$2K
Travel
$2K
Refunds
$1K
Contributions
$500

Purpose categories are self-reported on FEC filings; large “Other” totals are common.

Top Payees

1.

STRATHDEE GROUP

$107K
2.

JVE AGENCY

$75K
3.

OLSON REMCHO, LLP

$61K
4.

BLUE WAVE POLITICAL PARTNERS, LLC

$45K
5.

NGP VAN, INC.

$38K
6.

CALL TIME

$35K
7.

GOODMAN CAMPAIGNS LLC

$29K
8.

LOS ANGELES COUNTY REGISTRAR

$11K

Detailed Breakdown

Expenditures

Operating Costs

$11.9M

Operating Offsets

$140K

Net Operating

$11.8M

Loans

Candidate Loans

$9.2M

Refunds

Individual Refunds

$9K

Committee Refunds

$4K

Outside Spending (Super PACs)

Supporting

$5.2M

Opposing

$5.9M

Total Outside Spending

$11.2M

Top Outside Spenders

01

CONGRESSIONAL LEADERSHIP FUND

-$5.9M
$5.9M
02

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS CONGRESSIONAL FUND

+$1.8M
$1.8M
03

DCCC

+$1.1M
$1.1M
04

WITH HONOR FUND, INC.

+$859K
$859K
05

CALIFORNIANS FOR CHANGE

+$513K
$513K
06

NEXTGEN CLIMATE ACTION COMMITTEE

+$398K
$398K
07

VOTEVETS

+$388K
$388K
08

PROGRESSIVE TURNOUT PROJECT

+$71K
$71K

Independent expenditures are made without coordination with the candidate. Source: FEC Schedule E filings.

Coverage: 6/7/2017 – 12/31/2018FEC: H8CA39174Updated: 8/12/2026Source: FEC.gov (all authorized committees)
Gilbert Ray Cisneros — U.S. Representative for California 31: Voting Record & Donors | True Vote