Skip to content
Official portrait of George Whitesides, U.S. Representative for California

U.S. Representative

George Whitesides

California District 27

DemocratModerate Liberal

Votes on Record

452

across 19 categories

Write Letter

Contact

202-225-1956Official Website

1504 Longworth House Office Building Washington DC 20515-0527

Voting Profile

Legislative Record

452 votes analyzed

Most Active Policy Areas

#1 other#2 environment energy#3 budget#4 defense#5 criminal justice

452

Votes Analyzed

Data sources: voteview, congress.gov

Political Position

Ideology Spectrum

-0.20Moderate Liberal

George Whitesides holds a NOMINATE ideology score of -0.197, placing him in the moderate-liberal range of the political spectrum. This score is notably closer to the center than the average House Democrat (approximately -0.38), meaning he tends to vote more conservatively than most members of his party. Within the Democratic caucus, he would be considered a centrist or moderate Democrat.

LiberalModerateConservative
Democrat avg

More conservative than the average Democrat (-0.38)

Data source: VoteView NOMINATE scores (UCLA/UC San Diego)

Policy Positions

Category Breakdown

452

total votes analyzed

Overview

George Whitesides is a Democratic member of the U.S. House of Representatives from California with 452 recorded votes. His voting record places him among the more moderate members of his party, with a willingness to break from the Democratic majority on certain issues. His strongest areas of support include labor legislation, where he voted in favor of every measure that came before him, and foreign policy, where he supported 91% of the bills he voted on. He also shows strong support for defense-related measures at roughly 70%, which is relatively high for a Democrat. His voting pattern on budget and appropriations measures shows significant opposition, with only about 21% of votes in favor — reflecting disagreement with several major spending proposals, including the fiscal year 2027 budget resolution. On environmental and energy issues, Whitesides voted in favor of about 38% of measures, but his sample votes suggest he supported California's environmental regulatory authority while also backing water resources and ratepayer protection legislation. His immigration votes are evenly split at 50%, suggesting he evaluates immigration measures on a case-by-case basis rather than following a strict party-line approach. Notably, Whitesides voted against impeaching President Trump in September 2026, a position that diverged from many in his party. Combined with his centrist ideology score and mixed voting patterns across several categories, his record reflects a member who frequently exercises independent judgment on major votes.

Key Positions

  • •Voted against the impeachment of President Trump (September 2026), breaking with many members of his party on this high-profile vote.
  • •Supported every labor-related measure that came to a vote (100% Yea on 5 votes), indicating consistent backing of worker-related legislation.
  • •Voted in favor of 91% of foreign policy measures (10 of 11 votes), showing strong support for international engagement.
  • •Opposed the fiscal year 2027 congressional budget resolution and a continuing appropriations measure, voting against most budget proposals overall (only 21% Yea).
  • •Defended California's environmental regulatory authority by voting against a resolution to disapprove the state's harbor craft pollution standards.
  • •Supported veterans' legislation, including the Take Care of America's Veterans Act, and voted in favor of most defense measures (about 70% Yea).
  • •Split evenly on immigration-related votes (50% Yea, 50% Nay across 8 votes), suggesting a case-by-case approach rather than a fixed ideological stance.
  • •Voted in favor of a War Powers Resolution directing the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities in Lebanon, while voting against a related but differently structured earlier version.

By Policy Area

Other274
67% yea3% other30% nay
Environment & Energy34
38% yea62% nay
Budget & Spending24
21% yea79% nay
Defense23
70% yea30% nay
Criminal Justice13
69% yea8% other23% nay
Taxation11
73% yea27% nay
Foreign Policy11
91% yea9% nay
Technology10
70% yea30% nay
Education9
44% yea56% nay
Immigration8
50% yea50% nay
Housing8
38% yea63% nay
Agriculture6
67% yea33% nay
Infrastructure5
60% yea20% other20% nay
Labor5
100% yea0% nay

Analysis updated: September 18, 2026

Campaign Finance

Follow the Money

Includes all authorized campaign committees (principal committee, joint fundraising, and other authorized committees). Outside spending by Super PACs and independent groups is shown separately below.

Verify on FEC.gov →

Career: $14.6M

Fundraising Over Time

Raised per election cycleSpent

Contribution Sources

Individual$2.8M

82%

PAC / Committees$629K

18%

Party Committee$7K

0%

Individual Breakdown

Itemized (>$200)

$2.4M

Small Dollar (<$200)

$360K

Donation Sizes

Under $200
$507K · 16%
$200 – 499
$130K · 4%
$500 – 999
$250K · 8%
$1,000 – 1,999
$425K · 13%
$2,000+
$1.9M · 59%

Share of individual contribution dollars by donation size, current election cycle.

Where the Money Comes From

In-state (CA)$1.4M · 51%
Out-of-state$1.4M · 49%

Itemized individual contributions only (donations over $200 report the donor's state). Small-dollar donations are not included because the FEC does not itemize them.

CA (home)
$1.4M
NY
$356K
MA
$200K
IL
$132K
VA
$87K
CT
$84K
TX
$71K
MD
$65K

Top Contributors

See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded

Top Contributing Industries

Top Donor Employers

NOT EMPLOYED$1.0M
SELF EMPLOYED$338K
HARVARD UNIVERSITY$16K
JANE STREET CAPITAL$14K
MEDLEY PARTNERS LLC$14K
CHARLESBANK CAPITAL PARTNERS$14K
ARNOLD VENTURES$11K
ANDURIL INDUSTRIES$11K
MONTAGE INTERNATIONAL$11K
THE WONDERFUL COMPANY$11K
STANFORD UNIVERSITY$10K
QUINN EMANUEL$10K

Employer as self-reported by itemized donors. “Not Employed” and “Self-Employed” typically rank highest for small-dollar campaigns and include retirees.

Where the Money Goes

Spending by Purpose

Other / Uncategorized
$1.1M
Advertising
$196K
Contributions
$163K
Fundraising
$108K
Administrative
$94K
Refunds
$54K
Travel
$7K
Materials
$4K

Purpose categories are self-reported on FEC filings; large “Other” totals are common.

Top Payees

1.

GUSTO

$298K
2.

WEST WEST DIGITAL

$259K
3.

THE FROST GROUP

$137K
4.

DCCC

$137K
5.

TECHNICOLOR CAMPAIGNS LLC

$100K
6.

ACTBLUE TECHNICAL SERVICES

$87K
7.

HARRIS, EMMA

$76K
8.

AMS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

$53K

Detailed Breakdown

Expenditures

Operating Costs

$1.5M

Operating Offsets

$79K

Net Operating

$1.4M

Refunds

Individual Refunds

$53K

Committee Refunds

$4K

Outside Spending (Super PACs)

Supporting

$8.9M

Opposing

$13.7M

Total Outside Spending

$22.6M

Top Outside Spenders

01

CONGRESSIONAL LEADERSHIP FUND

-$9.2M
$9.2M
02

HMP

+$5.4M
$5.4M
03

NRCC

-$4.5M
$4.5M
04

LCV VICTORY FUND

+$3.4M
$3.4M
05

PLANNED PARENTHOOD AFFILIATES OF CALIFORNIA VOTES PAC

+$94K
$94K
06

SEIU COPE (SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION COMMITTEE ON POLITICAL EDUCATION)

+$33K
$33K
07

MAJORITY PAC

-$22K
$22K

Independent expenditures are made without coordination with the candidate. Source: FEC Schedule E filings.

Coverage: 1/1/2025 – 6/30/2026FEC: H4CA27111Updated: 8/12/2026Source: FEC.gov (all authorized committees)
George Whitesides — U.S. Representative for California 27: Voting Record & Donors | True Vote