Skip to content
Official portrait of Gary J. Palmer, U.S. Representative for Alabama

U.S. Representative

Gary J. Palmer

Alabama District 6

RepublicanVery Conservative

Votes on Record

525

across 19 categories

Write Letter

Contact

202-225-4921Official Website

170 Cannon House Office Building Washington DC 20515-0106

Voting Profile

Legislative Record

525 votes analyzed

Most Active Policy Areas

#1 other#2 healthcare#3 environment energy#4 defense#5 budget

525

Votes Analyzed

Data sources: voteview, congress.gov

Political Position

Ideology Spectrum

0.67Very Conservative

Rep. Gary J. Palmer's voting record places him firmly in the conservative wing of the Republican Party. His ideological score of 0.674 on the NOMINATE scale (where -1 is most liberal and +1 is most conservative) is notably higher than the average House Republican score of 0.520. This means he consistently takes more conservative positions than many of his Republican colleagues on the issues that come before the House.

LiberalModerateConservative
Republican avg

More conservative than the average Republican (0.52)

Data source: VoteView NOMINATE scores (UCLA/UC San Diego)

Policy Positions

Category Breakdown

525

total votes analyzed

Overview

Rep. Gary J. Palmer of Alabama has built a legislative record defined by strong support for deregulation, fiscal conservatism, and law enforcement, paired with skepticism toward foreign engagement and labor protections. Across 525 recorded votes, he has been one of the more reliably conservative members of the House Republican conference. His highest levels of support appear in technology legislation (100% yea on 10 votes), criminal justice measures (100% yea on 13 votes), and tax-related bills (91% yea on 11 votes). He also votes frequently in favor of energy and environment bills that come to the floor, often supporting measures that would limit federal environmental regulations, such as voting to disapprove certain EPA rules. On budget matters, he has supported fiscal year spending frameworks and continuing resolutions at a high rate. Palmer's record is more divided on healthcare, where his votes split nearly evenly — 51% yea across 51 votes — suggesting he evaluates health-related legislation on a case-by-case basis rather than voting uniformly. He has voted against procedural motions on bills related to Medicaid and health insurance premiums. In contrast, he votes against most foreign policy measures brought to the floor, supporting only about 36% of them, and has opposed War Powers resolutions directing the removal of U.S. forces from overseas. On labor issues, Palmer has voted yea on only 20% of bills in that category, and he voted nay on the one reproductive rights measure in his record. His overall pattern reflects a legislator who prioritizes limited government, free-market approaches, and traditional conservative positions across most policy areas.

Key Positions

  • •Supports rolling back federal environmental regulations — voted yea on 88% of environment and energy bills, including a vote to disapprove an EPA rule on California nonroad engine pollution standards.
  • •Consistently votes in favor of tax-related legislation, supporting 91% of taxation bills that came to a vote.
  • •Voted yea on all 13 criminal justice measures in his record, indicating strong and uniform support for law enforcement and public safety legislation.
  • •Supported all 10 technology-related bills, showing consistent backing for tech-focused policy.
  • •Takes a mixed approach to healthcare policy — voted yea on 51% of 51 healthcare votes, and voted against motions to recommit on the Do No Harm in Medicaid Act and the Lower Health Care Premiums for All Americans Act.
  • •Opposes most foreign policy measures, voting yea on only 36% of foreign policy bills, including a nay vote on a War Powers Resolution to withdraw U.S. forces from Lebanon.
  • •Votes against most labor-related legislation, supporting only 20% of labor bills in his record.
  • •Supported the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2027 but has been selective on military deployment questions, opposing some measures related to overseas troop commitments.

By Policy Area

Other279
75% yea1% other24% nay
Healthcare51
51% yea2% other47% nay
Environment & Energy34
88% yea3% other9% nay
Defense31
65% yea35% nay
Budget & Spending28
82% yea18% nay
Criminal Justice13
100% yea0% nay
Education11
73% yea27% nay
Taxation11
91% yea9% nay
Foreign Policy11
36% yea64% nay
Agriculture10
60% yea40% nay
Technology10
100% yea0% nay
Housing8
88% yea13% nay
Immigration8
75% yea25% nay
Infrastructure5
80% yea20% nay
Labor5
20% yea20% other60% nay

Analysis updated: September 18, 2026

Campaign Finance

Follow the Money

Includes all authorized campaign committees (principal committee, joint fundraising, and other authorized committees). Outside spending by Super PACs and independent groups is shown separately below.

Verify on FEC.gov →

Career: $9.3M

Fundraising Over Time

Raised per election cycleSpent

Contribution Sources

Individual$550K

54%

PAC / Committees$464K

46%

Individual Breakdown

Itemized (>$200)

$549K

Small Dollar (<$200)

$806.2

Donation Sizes

Under $200
$2K · 0%
$200 – 499
$2K · 0%
$500 – 999
$20K · 4%
$1,000 – 1,999
$56K · 10%
$2,000+
$458K · 85%

Share of individual contribution dollars by donation size, current election cycle.

Where the Money Comes From

In-state (AL)$400K · 74%
Out-of-state$137K · 26%

Itemized individual contributions only (donations over $200 report the donor's state). Small-dollar donations are not included because the FEC does not itemize them.

AL (home)
$400K
TX
$45K
FL
$30K
GA
$15K
VA
$11K
DC
$8K
PA
$7K
NY
$4K

Top Contributors

See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded

Top Contributing Industries

Top Donor Employers

NONE$119K
NULL$65K
MEDICAL PROPERTIES TRUST INC.$18K
SELF EMPLOYED$17K
BRASFIELD GORRIE$12K
NEWCASTLE CONSTRUCTION$10K
HAMMER LGC$7K
COOKS PEST CONTROL INC.$7K
COOPER T. SMITH CORP.$7K
HOAR CONSTRUCTION$7K
HARBERT MANAGEMENT$7K
MCGRUFF SEIBLES$7K

Employer as self-reported by itemized donors. “Not Employed” and “Self-Employed” typically rank highest for small-dollar campaigns and include retirees.

Where the Money Goes

Spending by Purpose

Other / Uncategorized
$683K
Advertising
$70K
Contributions
$54K
Materials
$37K
Administrative
$35K
Fundraising
$15K
Refunds
$12K

Purpose categories are self-reported on FEC filings; large “Other” totals are common.

Top Payees

1.

STRATEGIC IMPACT

$199K
2.

WELDEN HOGAN STRATEGIES

$117K
3.

THE LOLLAR GROUP

$100K
4.

THE ELEVATED GROUP

$50K
5.

NRCC

$46K
6.

PROFESSIONAL DATA SERVICES

$37K
7.

LAMAR

$24K
8.

COTTON STATE MEDIA DBA FOCUS CREATIVE

$19K

Detailed Breakdown

Expenditures

Operating Costs

$863K

Operating Offsets

$7K

Net Operating

$856K

Refunds

Individual Refunds

$29K

Outside Spending (Super PACs)

Supporting

$91K

Opposing

$2K

Total Outside Spending

$92K

Top Outside Spenders

01

LETSALLVOTE.ORG

+$80K
$80K
02

CLUB FOR GROWTH PAC

+$6K
$6K
03

HOUSE FREEDOM FUND

+$4K
$4K
04

EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY ACTION FUND

-$861.86
$861.86
05

TOGETHER WE THRIVE

-$750
$750
06

TEA PARTY PATRIOTS CITIZENS FUND

+$500
$500
07

PATRIOT VOICES PAC

+$25.66
$25.66
08

NATIONAL RIGHT TO LIFE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE

+$10.67
$10.67

Independent expenditures are made without coordination with the candidate. Source: FEC Schedule E filings.

Coverage: 1/1/2025 – 7/22/2026FEC: H4AL06098Updated: 8/12/2026Source: FEC.gov (all authorized committees)
Gary J. Palmer — U.S. Representative for Alabama 6: Voting Record & Donors | True Vote