Skip to content
Official portrait of Eric Swalwell, U.S. Representative for California

U.S. Representative

Eric Swalwell

California District 14

DemocratProgressive

Votes on Record

409

across 19 categories

Write Letter

Contact

Contact information not yet available

Voting Profile

Legislative Record

409 votes analyzed

Most Active Policy Areas

#1 other#2 healthcare#3 budget#4 environment energy#5 defense

409

Votes Analyzed

Data sources: voteview, congress.gov

Political Position

Ideology Spectrum

-0.35Progressive

Eric Swalwell's voting record places him as a progressive Democrat, though he sits slightly closer to the political center than the average member of his party. His NOMINATE ideology score of -0.355 (on a scale from -1, most liberal, to +1, most conservative) is just to the right of the Democratic average of -0.380, meaning he generally votes in line with his party but occasionally breaks toward more moderate positions.

LiberalModerateConservative
Democrat avg

Near the average for Democrats (-0.38)

Data source: VoteView NOMINATE scores (UCLA/UC San Diego)

Policy Positions

Category Breakdown

409

total votes analyzed

Overview

Eric Swalwell is a Democratic member of the U.S. House of Representatives from California with 409 recorded votes in the dataset. His voting record reflects a consistently progressive approach across most policy areas, with particularly strong alignment on technology, foreign policy, and defense-related legislation. On healthcare, Swalwell has supported roughly half the bills that came to a vote, while opposing a significant share as well — a pattern that often reflects support for Democratic healthcare proposals and opposition to Republican-led changes to programs like Medicaid. His budget and environment/energy votes show high opposition rates, which in a Republican-controlled House typically indicates disagreement with the majority party's spending priorities and energy policies rather than opposition to those topics broadly. Swalwell shows notable engagement on defense and veterans' issues, voting in favor of the majority of defense-related bills, including veterans' services legislation. He has also supported most technology-related bills that reached the floor. His record on banking and finance bills shows consistent opposition during this period, voting against all four bills in that category. It is worth noting that a substantial number of Swalwell's recorded entries across categories are marked as 'not voting,' which may reflect absences, strategic decisions, or procedural circumstances. Voters should consider both his active votes and his participation rate when evaluating his record.

Key Positions

  • •Consistently supported veterans' legislation, including voting in favor of the Veterans Accessibility Advisory Committee Act and the Veterans Readiness and Employment Improvement Act.
  • •Voted in favor of 80% of technology-related bills, suggesting strong support for technology policy measures.
  • •Opposed all four banking and finance bills on record, indicating disagreement with the financial legislation brought to the floor during this period.
  • •Voted against most budget bills (only 20% yea), a pattern consistent with opposing the majority party's spending and appropriations proposals.
  • •Supported 60% of foreign policy measures and did not cast a nay vote on any foreign policy bill in the dataset.
  • •Voted in favor of the Pay Our Homeland Defenders Act, which addressed compensation for Department of Homeland Security employees.
  • •Showed low support for environment and energy bills on record (12% yea), which in a Republican-led House typically reflects opposition to the majority's energy agenda rather than opposition to environmental protections.

By Policy Area

Other201
42% yea35% other23% nay
Healthcare63
54% yea6% other40% nay
Budget & Spending25
20% yea16% other64% nay
Environment & Energy25
12% yea36% other52% nay
Defense24
54% yea21% other25% nay
Education10
40% yea40% other20% nay
Agriculture9
11% yea45% other44% nay
Criminal Justice8
25% yea25% other50% nay
Immigration7
29% yea42% other29% nay
Taxation6
50% yea17% other33% nay
Housing5
20% yea40% other40% nay
Foreign Policy5
60% yea40% other0% nay
Technology5
80% yea20% nay

Analysis updated: September 18, 2026

Campaign Finance

Follow the Money

Includes all authorized campaign committees (principal committee, joint fundraising, and other authorized committees). Outside spending by Super PACs and independent groups is shown separately below.

Verify on FEC.gov →

Career: $20.7M

Fundraising Over Time

Raised per election cycleSpent

Contribution Sources

Individual$1.5M

89%

PAC / Committees$178K

11%

Party Committee$779.17

0%

Individual Breakdown

Itemized (>$200)

$1.2M

Small Dollar (<$200)

$283K

Donation Sizes

Under $200
$353K · 24%
$200 – 499
$45K · 3%
$500 – 999
$96K · 7%
$1,000 – 1,999
$186K · 13%
$2,000+
$800K · 54%

Share of individual contribution dollars by donation size, current election cycle.

Where the Money Comes From

In-state (CA)$609K · 51%
Out-of-state$588K · 49%

Itemized individual contributions only (donations over $200 report the donor's state). Small-dollar donations are not included because the FEC does not itemize them.

CA (home)
$609K
NY
$126K
TX
$87K
FL
$81K
IL
$50K
MA
$41K
DC
$27K
MD
$22K

Top Contributors

See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded

Top Contributing Industries

Top Donor Employers

NOT EMPLOYED$312K
SELF EMPLOYED$79K
SELF$34K
RETIRED$27K
NX$11K
WESTMED$8K
ANOTHER PLANET ENTERTAINMENT$7K
MASS GENERAL HOSPITAL$7K
LAW OFFICE OF JASPREET SINGH$7K
CONSERO GROUP$7K
KAMPACK INC.$7K
LEESFIELD & PARTNERS$7K

Employer as self-reported by itemized donors. “Not Employed” and “Self-Employed” typically rank highest for small-dollar campaigns and include retirees.

Where the Money Goes

Spending by Purpose

Other / Uncategorized
$1.1M
Materials
$298K
Administrative
$279K
Refunds
$190K
Contributions
$49K
Fundraising
$35K
Travel
$18K
Advertising
$7K

Purpose categories are self-reported on FEC filings; large “Other” totals are common.

Top Payees

1.

BERGER HIRSCHBERG STRATEGIES

$223K
2.

MEYER, DARLY

$132K
3.

THE TUCKER GROUP

$114K
4.

UNITED AIRLINES

$111K
5.

RIVER CITY BUSINESS SERVICES

$103K
6.

BCOM SOLUTIONS, LLC

$100K
7.

SWALWELL, ERIC

$78K
8.

ZAMANI, JASMINE

$55K

Detailed Breakdown

Expenditures

Operating Costs

$1.8M

Operating Offsets

$54K

Net Operating

$1.7M

Refunds

Individual Refunds

$188K

Committee Refunds

$4K

Outside Spending (Super PACs)

Supporting

$126K

Opposing

$26K

Total Outside Spending

$151K

Top Outside Spenders

01

ALPHA VALLEY BUSINESS AND TECHNOLOGY CONSORTIUM

+$109K
$109K
02

WE VOTE - NOSOTROS VOTAMOS - PPAMM COMMITTEE

+$122.44-$26K
$26K
03

OHLONE AREA UNITED DEMOCRATIC CAMPAIGN

+$13K
$13K
04

COURAGE CALIFORNIA SUPER PAC

+$3K
$3K
05

TOGETHER WE THRIVE

+$750
$750
06

PLANNED PARENTHOOD VOTES

+$195.45
$195.45
07

NEA ADVOCACY FUND

+$67.26
$67.26
08

SIERRA CLUB POLITICAL COMMITTEE

+$30
$30

Independent expenditures are made without coordination with the candidate. Source: FEC Schedule E filings.

Coverage: 1/1/2025 – 6/30/2026FEC: H2CA15094Updated: 8/12/2026Source: FEC.gov (all authorized committees)