
U.S. Representative
Eleanor Holmes Norton
District of Columbia District 0
Votes on Record
19
across 3 categories
Contact

U.S. Representative
District of Columbia District 0
Votes on Record
19
across 3 categories
Contact
Voting Profile
Most Active Policy Areas
19
Votes Analyzed
Data sources: voteview, congress.gov
Political Position
Eleanor Holmes Norton holds a NOMINATE ideology score of -0.491 on a scale from -1 (most liberal) to +1 (most conservative). This places her noticeably to the left of the average House Democrat, whose score sits around -0.38. In plain terms, she consistently supports progressive policy positions and votes with the more liberal wing of her party.
More liberal than the average Democrat (-0.38)
Data source: VoteView NOMINATE scores (UCLA/UC San Diego)
Policy Positions
19
total votes analyzed
Overview
Eleanor Holmes Norton serves as the Delegate to the U.S. House of Representatives from the District of Columbia. As a delegate rather than a full voting member, she holds limited voting rights on the House floor — she can vote in committees and in the Committee of the Whole (a procedural stage of debate), but her vote does not count on final passage of legislation. This unique role is important context for understanding her relatively small number of recorded votes (19 total). Her voting record, though limited in volume, aligns with her progressive ideology score. The available votes span several decades of service and cover procedural motions, appropriations measures, and agriculture-related funding. In the most recent session, her recorded votes are predominantly 'Nay' votes, which is consistent with a member of the minority party opposing majority-led measures. Norton has long been an advocate for DC statehood and expanded representation for District residents. While the voting data provided does not capture the full scope of her legislative work — much of which occurs through committee participation, bill sponsorship, and advocacy — her ideology score and available votes indicate a firmly progressive approach to governance.
Key Positions
By Policy Area
Analysis updated: September 18, 2026
Campaign Finance
Includes all authorized campaign committees (principal committee, joint fundraising, and other authorized committees). Outside spending by Super PACs and independent groups is shown separately below.
Verify on FEC.gov →Career: $5.5M
Fundraising Over Time
Contribution Sources
65%
34%
1%
0%
Donation Sizes
Share of individual contribution dollars by donation size, current election cycle.
Where the Money Comes From
Itemized individual contributions only (donations over $200 report the donor's state). Small-dollar donations are not included because the FEC does not itemize them.
Top Contributors
Top Contributing Industries
Top Donor Employers
Employer as self-reported by itemized donors. “Not Employed” and “Self-Employed” typically rank highest for small-dollar campaigns and include retirees.
Where the Money Goes
Spending by Purpose
Purpose categories are self-reported on FEC filings; large “Other” totals are common.
Top Payees
J. POPE CONSULTING, LLC
CAPITOL COMPLIANCE ASSOCIATES, INC.
PELT, JACQUELINE
NGP VAN
INTUIT, INC.
THE MONOCLE RESTAURANT
WIX.COM
US POSTAL SERVICE
Detailed Breakdown
Expenditures
Operating Costs
$447K
Loans
Candidate Loans
$20K
Outside Spending (Super PACs)
Supporting
$764.52
Opposing
$21
Total Outside Spending
$785.52
Top Outside Spenders
DC FOR DEMOCRACY PAC
PLANNED PARENTHOOD VOTES
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIREFIGHTERS INTERESTED IN REGISTRATION AND EDUCATION PAC
NARAL Pro-Choice America
Independent expenditures are made without coordination with the candidate. Source: FEC Schedule E filings.
Voting Record
19 votes across 3 categories