Skip to content
Official portrait of Doris O. Matsui, U.S. Representative for California

U.S. Representative

Doris O. Matsui

California District 7

DemocratProgressive

Votes on Record

638

across 19 categories

Write Letter

Contact

202-225-7163Official Website

2206 Rayburn House Office Building Washington DC 20515-0507

Voting Profile

Legislative Record

638 votes analyzed

Most Active Policy Areas

#1 other#2 healthcare#3 budget#4 environment energy#5 defense

638

Votes Analyzed

Data sources: voteview, congress.gov

Political Position

Ideology Spectrum

-0.43Progressive

Rep. Doris Matsui's NOMINATE score of -0.434 places her slightly to the left of the average House Democrat (roughly -0.38). In plain terms, she votes consistently with the progressive wing of the Democratic Party, though she is not among the furthest-left members of the chamber. Her voting record reflects mainstream Democratic positions with a somewhat stronger lean toward progressive priorities.

LiberalModerateConservative
Democrat avg

Near the average for Democrats (-0.38)

Data source: VoteView NOMINATE scores (UCLA/UC San Diego)

Policy Positions

Category Breakdown

638

total votes analyzed

Overview

Doris Matsui is a Democratic member of the U.S. House representing California. Across 638 recorded votes, she has shown strong engagement on healthcare legislation (112 votes), budget and spending bills (46 votes), and environment and energy policy (35 votes). Her voting patterns closely track her party's positions on most issues, with particularly consistent support for defense-related measures and foreign policy bills. On fiscal matters, Matsui has opposed most recent budget proposals brought to the floor, voting against continuing appropriations and budget resolutions in 2026. In healthcare, she has supported motions related to Medicaid protections and efforts to lower health insurance premiums. On environmental issues, she has backed water resources legislation while opposing measures that would roll back state-level emissions regulations. Matsui has voted in favor of every foreign policy measure in the dataset (11 of 11) and has supported a large majority of defense bills, including the National Defense Authorization Act and veterans' care legislation. She also voted in favor of a War Powers Resolution measure regarding U.S. forces in Lebanon, reflecting support for congressional oversight of military deployments. Her record on criminal justice, housing, and immigration shows more frequent opposition votes, suggesting she has pushed back against proposals in those areas that advanced under the current House majority. With a relatively large voting record of 638 votes, she is an active participant in floor proceedings.

Key Positions

  • •Consistently supported healthcare access legislation, including voting for motions related to the Do No Harm in Medicaid Act and the Lower Health Care Premiums for All Americans Act in December 2025.
  • •Opposed recent Republican-led budget proposals, voting against the fiscal year 2027 budget resolution and continuing appropriations measures in July 2026.
  • •Supported environmental protections, voting against a measure to disapprove of California's harbor craft emissions standards while backing the Water Resources Development Act and the Ratepayer Protection Act.
  • •Voted for the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2027 and the Take Care of America's Veterans Act, reflecting support for military funding and veterans' services.
  • •Supported congressional oversight of military action, voting to direct the President to remove U.S. forces from hostilities in Lebanon under the War Powers Resolution.
  • •Voted in favor of all 11 foreign policy measures in the dataset, showing strong engagement on international affairs.
  • •Supported the National Fraud Enforcement Division Act and voted against the PROOF Act in September 2026, reflecting priorities on government accountability and oversight.

By Policy Area

Other280
64% yea36% nay
Healthcare112
63% yea37% nay
Budget & Spending46
26% yea2% other72% nay
Environment & Energy35
34% yea66% nay
Defense32
75% yea25% nay
Agriculture28
57% yea43% nay
Education13
62% yea38% nay
Taxation13
62% yea38% nay
Criminal Justice13
31% yea69% nay
Foreign Policy11
100% yea0% nay
Technology10
60% yea40% nay
Banking & Finance9
44% yea56% nay
Housing9
33% yea67% nay
Immigration8
38% yea63% nay
Social Security6
67% yea33% nay
Labor6
67% yea33% nay
Infrastructure5
60% yea40% nay

Analysis updated: September 18, 2026

Campaign Finance

Follow the Money

Includes all authorized campaign committees (principal committee, joint fundraising, and other authorized committees). Outside spending by Super PACs and independent groups is shown separately below.

Verify on FEC.gov →

Career: $15.1M

Fundraising Over Time

Raised per election cycleSpent

Contribution Sources

Individual$840K

47%

PAC / Committees$937K

52%

Self-Funded$15K

1%

Individual Breakdown

Itemized (>$200)

$812K

Small Dollar (<$200)

$28K

Donation Sizes

Under $200
$32K · 4%
$200 – 499
$30K · 4%
$500 – 999
$75K · 9%
$1,000 – 1,999
$169K · 20%
$2,000+
$532K · 63%

Share of individual contribution dollars by donation size, current election cycle.

Where the Money Comes From

In-state (CA)$359K · 44%
Out-of-state$451K · 56%

Itemized individual contributions only (donations over $200 report the donor's state). Small-dollar donations are not included because the FEC does not itemize them.

CA (home)
$359K
DC
$214K
VA
$79K
MD
$51K
NY
$38K
TX
$19K
MA
$9K
WA
$7K

Top Contributors

See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded

Top Contributing Industries

Top Donor Employers

RETIRED$167K
SELF-EMPLOYED$41K
SELF$26K
SUTTER HEALTH$23K
ANTHROPIC$17K
N/A$15K
ANTAEUS ENTERPRISES INC.$14K
BGR GROUP$9K
MIT$8K
SUTTER$8K
KORSHAK KRACOFF KONG & SUGANO LLP$7K
CALVIN CAFRITZ ENTERPRISES$7K

Employer as self-reported by itemized donors. “Not Employed” and “Self-Employed” typically rank highest for small-dollar campaigns and include retirees.

Where the Money Goes

Spending by Purpose

Advertising
$1.9M
Other / Uncategorized
$912K
Materials
$170K
Contributions
$40K
Fundraising
$16K
Administrative
$11K
Refunds
$7K

Purpose categories are self-reported on FEC filings; large “Other” totals are common.

Top Payees

1.

BUYING TIME

$1.3M
2.

ORLATTLE LLC

$527K
3.

ACOSTA CONSULTING

$262K
4.

GRINDSTONE FIELD SOLUTIONS

$178K
5.

DAVEY CONSULTING, LLC

$126K
6.

HART RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC.

$83K
7.

HOTHI, MANMIT

$69K
8.

AMW CONSULTING

$65K

Detailed Breakdown

Expenditures

Operating Costs

$3.0M

Net Operating

$3.0M

Loans

Candidate Loans

$1.4M

Refunds

Individual Refunds

$10K

Committee Refunds

$1K

Outside Spending (Super PACs)

Supporting

$4K

Opposing

$0

Total Outside Spending

$4K

Top Outside Spenders

01

COURAGE CALIFORNIA SUPER PAC

+$3K
$3K
02

TOGETHER WE THRIVE

+$750
$750
03

SIERRA CLUB POLITICAL COMMITTEE

+$360
$360
04

PLANNED PARENTHOOD VOTES

+$195.45
$195.45
05

WE VOTE - NOSOTROS VOTAMOS - PPAMM COMMITTEE

+$124.38
$124.38
06

YOLO COUNTY DEMOCRATIC CENTRAL COMMITTEE - FEDERAL ACCOUNT

+$91.23
$91.23
07

NEA ADVOCACY FUND

+$67.26
$67.26
08

HUMANE SOCIETY LEGISLATIVE FUND

+$25.77
$25.77

Independent expenditures are made without coordination with the candidate. Source: FEC Schedule E filings.

Coverage: 1/1/2025 – 6/30/2026FEC: H6CA05195Updated: 8/12/2026Source: FEC.gov (all authorized committees)