Skip to content
Official portrait of David G. Valadao, U.S. Representative for California

U.S. Representative

David G. Valadao

California District 22

RepublicanModerate Conservative

Votes on Record

533

across 19 categories

Write Letter

Contact

202-225-4695Official Website

2465 Rayburn House Office Building Washington DC 20515-0522

Voting Profile

Legislative Record

533 votes analyzed

Most Active Policy Areas

#1 other#2 healthcare#3 environment energy#4 defense#5 budget

533

Votes Analyzed

Data sources: voteview, congress.gov

Political Position

Ideology Spectrum

0.26Moderate Conservative

David Valadao's ideology score of 0.257 on the NOMINATE scale places him in the moderate conservative range. The average House Republican scores around 0.520, making Valadao notably more centrist than most members of his party. This positioning reflects a voting record that sometimes aligns with Democrats on certain issues while still leaning conservative overall.

LiberalModerateConservative
Republican avg

More liberal than the average Republican (0.52)

Data source: VoteView NOMINATE scores (UCLA/UC San Diego)

Policy Positions

Category Breakdown

533

total votes analyzed

Overview

David Valadao is a Republican U.S. Representative from California whose voting record marks him as one of the more moderate members of his party. Across 533 recorded votes, he shows strong support for legislation related to criminal justice, technology, banking and finance, and environmental and energy policy, while taking a more selective approach on healthcare, defense, and foreign policy matters. On economic issues, Valadao has generally supported budget and taxation measures brought by his party, voting in favor of the fiscal year 2027 budget resolution and continuing appropriations. His agriculture votes reflect a mixed pattern, which is notable given that he represents a major farming region in California's Central Valley. He has supported infrastructure and housing legislation at relatively high rates. Valadao's record on social issues is limited in the available data, with only single recorded votes on reproductive rights and civil rights. On immigration, he has voted in favor of related legislation about 63% of the time, a pattern that may reflect the demographics and priorities of his district. His foreign policy votes trend toward opposition, with a 36% support rate, including votes against War Powers Resolution measures regarding U.S. military involvement in Lebanon.

Key Positions

  • •Supported every criminal justice bill that came to a vote, with a 100% approval rate across 13 recorded votes, suggesting consistent backing of law enforcement and public safety legislation.
  • •Voted in favor of environmental and energy measures 91% of the time across 34 votes, including support for the Water Resources Development Act and the Ratepayer Protection Act.
  • •Supported technology-related legislation in all 10 recorded votes, indicating consistent backing of tech industry and digital policy measures.
  • •Voted against War Powers Resolution measures that would have directed the removal of U.S. Armed Forces from Lebanon, siding with maintaining the current military posture.
  • •Showed a mixed record on healthcare with a 61% support rate across 57 votes, voting against motions to recommit on bills like the Do No Harm in Medicaid Act and the Lower Health Care Premiums for All Americans Act.
  • •Opposed labor-related legislation more often than not, supporting only 40% of such measures across 5 recorded votes.
  • •Cast the sole recorded vote on reproductive rights as a Nay, though the limited sample size makes it difficult to draw broad conclusions.

By Policy Area

Other279
78% yea2% other20% nay
Healthcare57
61% yea4% other35% nay
Environment & Energy34
91% yea9% nay
Defense31
68% yea32% nay
Budget & Spending29
76% yea7% other17% nay
Criminal Justice13
100% yea0% nay
Taxation12
83% yea17% nay
Foreign Policy11
36% yea64% nay
Agriculture10
60% yea40% nay
Technology10
100% yea0% nay
Housing9
78% yea22% nay
Education9
67% yea11% other22% nay
Immigration8
63% yea38% nay
Banking & Finance5
100% yea0% nay
Labor5
40% yea60% nay
Infrastructure5
80% yea20% nay

Analysis updated: September 18, 2026

Campaign Finance

Follow the Money

Includes all authorized campaign committees (principal committee, joint fundraising, and other authorized committees). Outside spending by Super PACs and independent groups is shown separately below.

Verify on FEC.gov →

Career: $27.7M

Fundraising Over Time

Raised per election cycleSpent

Contribution Sources

Individual$1.4M

43%

PAC / Committees$1.9M

57%

Party Committee$10K

0%

Individual Breakdown

Itemized (>$200)

$1.3M

Small Dollar (<$200)

$97K

Donation Sizes

Under $200
$116K · 4%
$200 – 499
$65K · 2%
$500 – 999
$202K · 6%
$1,000 – 1,999
$659K · 20%
$2,000+
$2.2M · 68%

Share of individual contribution dollars by donation size, current election cycle.

Where the Money Comes From

In-state (CA)$1.1M · 34%
Out-of-state$2.1M · 66%

Itemized individual contributions only (donations over $200 report the donor's state). Small-dollar donations are not included because the FEC does not itemize them.

CA (home)
$1.1M
FL
$439K
TX
$437K
NY
$153K
VA
$132K
LA
$100K
DC
$69K
IL
$67K

Top Contributors

See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded

Top Contributing Industries

Top Donor Employers

RETIRED$471K
NONE$140K
NULL$78K
INVESTOR$25K
NEXTERA ENERGY$20K
EVGO$19K
PHOENIX MANAGEMENT$14K
STATION CASINOS, LLC$14K
REQUESTED$14K
FOUNDERS FUND$14K
PERFORMANCE CONTRACTORS$14K
CEO$14K

Employer as self-reported by itemized donors. “Not Employed” and “Self-Employed” typically rank highest for small-dollar campaigns and include retirees.

Where the Money Goes

Spending by Purpose

Other / Uncategorized
$1.4M
Fundraising
$132K
Refunds
$42K
Advertising
$13K

Purpose categories are self-reported on FEC filings; large “Other” totals are common.

Top Payees

1.

ROSE STRATEGIES

$719K
2.

CHASE - VISA

$125K
3.

VALLEY VISION TREASURY

$101K
4.

NO ON PROP 50 - STOP SACRAMENTO'S POWER GRAB

$100K
5.

THE VOYAGEUR COMPANY LLC

$88K
6.

KRAMER & ASSOCIATES

$82K
7.

CAPITOL HILL CLUB

$57K
8.

ARENA ONLINE

$55K

Detailed Breakdown

Expenditures

Operating Costs

$1.5M

Net Operating

$1.5M

Refunds

Individual Refunds

$44K

Committee Refunds

$3K

Outside Spending (Super PACs)

Supporting

$8.7M

Opposing

$34.3M

Total Outside Spending

$43.1M

Top Outside Spenders

01

HOUSE MAJORITY PAC

-$18.0M
$18.0M
02

DCCC

-$15.4M
$15.4M
03

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS CONGRESSIONAL FUND

+$4.6M
$4.6M
04

FAIRSHAKE

+$2.6M
$2.6M
05

DEFENDING MAIN STREET SUPERPAC INC.

+$600K
$600K
06

US CHAMBER OF COMMERCE

+$600K
$600K
07

314 ACTION FUND

-$458K
$458K
08

AMERICAN HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION PAC

+$300K
$300K

Independent expenditures are made without coordination with the candidate. Source: FEC Schedule E filings.

Coverage: 1/1/2025 – 6/30/2026FEC: H2CA20094Updated: 8/12/2026Source: FEC.gov (all authorized committees)