Skip to content

Voting Profile

Legislative Record

675 votes analyzed

Most Active Policy Areas

#1 other#2 environment energy#3 defense#4 healthcare#5 foreign policy

675

Votes Analyzed

Data sources: voteview, congress.gov

Political Position

Ideology Spectrum

0.48Conservative

Senator Dan Sullivan's voting record places him in the conservative range of the political spectrum, with an ideology score of 0.477 on a scale from -1 (most liberal) to +1 (most conservative). However, he sits slightly to the left of the average Republican senator (0.520), suggesting he occasionally parts from his party's majority position. This makes him a fairly typical conservative who is modestly more moderate than many of his Republican colleagues.

LiberalModerateConservative
Republican avg

Near the average for Republicans (0.52)

Data source: VoteView NOMINATE scores (UCLA/UC San Diego)

Policy Positions

Category Breakdown

675

total votes analyzed

Overview

Dan Sullivan is a Republican U.S. Senator from Alaska with a substantial voting record of 675 recorded votes. His strongest area of consensus is foreign policy, where he has voted in favor of measures 94.5% of the time, reflecting consistent support for U.S. engagement abroad, including confirmation of national security and diplomatic nominees. He has also shown strong support for housing-related measures (100% approval rate across 12 votes), immigration legislation (88.5%), and agriculture bills (88.9%). On defense, Sullivan's record is more divided than might be expected. While he supported the annual defense authorization bill, he consistently voted against resolutions that would have directed the removal of U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities involving Iran without congressional authorization — indicating he favors maintaining executive flexibility in military operations. His overall defense approval rate of 56.1% reflects a mix of support for military funding and opposition to measures that would constrain military deployments. Sullivan's most notable area of opposition is trade, where he voted against measures in four of six recorded votes (33.3% approval). This pattern suggests skepticism toward certain trade agreements or trade-related policies. On healthcare, his 66.1% approval rate shows a mixed record — he supported some nominees and opposed regulatory actions related to Medicare and the Affordable Care Act. In environment and energy policy, he supported most measures (79%) but opposed some environmental regulatory actions, consistent with Alaska's resource-dependent economy. Across the board, Sullivan's voting patterns reflect a senator who generally aligns with Republican priorities but does not vote in lockstep with his party on every issue, particularly on trade and certain defense matters.

Key Positions

  • •Consistently supports U.S. foreign policy engagement, voting in favor of foreign policy measures 94.5% of the time, including confirmations of national security officials such as the Director of National Intelligence.
  • •Opposes congressional efforts to limit executive military authority — voted against resolutions directing the removal of U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities involving Iran on multiple occasions.
  • •Skeptical of trade legislation, voting against trade-related measures in four of six recorded votes, the lowest approval rate among all his policy categories.
  • •Supports housing-related legislation unanimously, voting in favor of all 12 housing measures that came before him.
  • •Voted against disapproval resolutions targeting certain environmental regulations, including those related to PFAS chemical reporting requirements, while generally supporting energy measures (79% approval).
  • •Opposed a Medicare prior authorization model (the WISeR Model) and voted against Affordable Care Act market integrity rules, while supporting the confirmation of CDC leadership.
  • •Supported immigration-related measures at a high rate (88.5%), voting in favor of 23 out of 26 immigration bills.
  • •Supported the annual defense authorization bill for fiscal year 2027, reflecting broad backing for military funding and personnel strength levels.

By Policy Area

Other228
92% yea4% other4% nay
Environment & Energy81
79% yea21% nay
Defense66
56% yea44% nay
Healthcare59
66% yea2% other32% nay
Foreign Policy55
95% yea1% other4% nay
Budget & Spending47
77% yea6% other17% nay
Immigration26
88% yea12% nay
Taxation24
79% yea4% other17% nay
Banking & Finance19
68% yea32% nay
Infrastructure13
77% yea23% nay
Housing12
100% yea0% nay
Education11
82% yea9% other9% nay
Agriculture9
89% yea11% nay
Social Security7
57% yea14% other29% nay
Trade6
33% yea67% nay
Labor5
80% yea20% nay

Analysis updated: September 18, 2026

Campaign Finance

Follow the Money

Includes all authorized campaign committees (principal committee, joint fundraising, and other authorized committees). Outside spending by Super PACs and independent groups is shown separately below.

Verify on FEC.gov →

Career: $30.3M

Fundraising Over Time

Raised per election cycleSpent

Contribution Sources

Individual$5.5M

67%

PAC / Committees$2.6M

32%

Party Committee$62K

1%

Individual Breakdown

Itemized (>$200)

$4.8M

Small Dollar (<$200)

$698K

Donation Sizes

Under $200
$677K · 10%
$200 – 499
$152K · 2%
$500 – 999
$389K · 6%
$1,000 – 1,999
$1.2M · 18%
$2,000+
$4.2M · 64%

Share of individual contribution dollars by donation size, current election cycle.

Where the Money Comes From

In-state (AK)$853K · 14%
Out-of-state$5.2M · 86%

Itemized individual contributions only (donations over $200 report the donor's state). Small-dollar donations are not included because the FEC does not itemize them.

AK (home)
$853K
FL
$720K
TX
$659K
CA
$578K
NY
$578K
IL
$321K
VA
$314K
OH
$274K

Top Contributors

See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded

Top Contributing Industries

Top Donor Employers

RETIRED$1.3M
SELF EMPLOYED$234K
HOMEMAKER$196K
SELF$150K
NULL$76K
UNEMPLOYED$54K
KKR$50K
BLACKSTONE$39K
NOT EMPLOYED$35K
INFORMATION REQUESTED$29K
RDV CORPORATION$21K
GCI LIBERTY$20K

Employer as self-reported by itemized donors. “Not Employed” and “Self-Employed” typically rank highest for small-dollar campaigns and include retirees.

Where the Money Goes

Spending by Purpose

Other / Uncategorized
$1.8M
Fundraising
$173K
Advertising
$127K
Administrative
$94K
Materials
$43K
Refunds
$13K
Travel
$205

Purpose categories are self-reported on FEC filings; large “Other” totals are common.

Top Payees

1.

MAYBELL GROUP, LLC

$310K
2.

NORTHRIM CARDMEMBER SERVICES

$242K
3.

PEAK INSIGHTS

$201K
4.

RIZZO DUKES GROUP LLC

$199K
5.

BLACK ROCK GROUP LLC

$182K
6.

UNISOURCE DIRECT, LLC

$154K
7.

ARENA ONLINE

$98K
8.

PRAGMATIC DATA SOLUTIONS

$84K

Detailed Breakdown

Expenditures

Operating Costs

$5.1M

Operating Offsets

$9K

Net Operating

$5.1M

Refunds

Individual Refunds

$14K

Committee Refunds

$11K

Outside Spending (Super PACs)

Supporting

$3.1M

Opposing

$44.4M

Total Outside Spending

$47.5M

Top Outside Spenders

01

PUT ALASKA FIRST

-$13.2M
$13.2M
02

NORTH STAR

-$12.6M
$12.6M
03

DEMOCRATIC SENATORIAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE

-$7.1M
$7.1M
04

314 ACTION FUND

-$3.2M
$3.2M
05

THE LINCOLN PROJECT

-$2.5M
$2.5M
06

VOTEVETS

-$1.6M
$1.6M
07

LCV VICTORY FUND

-$1.6M
$1.6M
08

NEA ADVOCACY FUND

+$728K-$728K
$1.5M

Independent expenditures are made without coordination with the candidate. Source: FEC Schedule E filings.

Coverage: 1/1/2021 – 7/29/2026FEC: S4AK00214Updated: 8/12/2026Source: FEC.gov (all authorized committees)
Dan Sullivan — U.S. Senator for Alaska: Voting Record & Donors | True Vote