Skip to content
Official portrait of Dale W. Strong, U.S. Representative for Alabama

U.S. Representative

Dale W. Strong

Alabama District 5

RepublicanVery Conservative

Votes on Record

463

across 19 categories

Write Letter

Contact

202-225-4801Official Website

449 Cannon House Office Building Washington DC 20515-0105

Voting Profile

Legislative Record

463 votes analyzed

Most Active Policy Areas

#1 other#2 environment energy#3 defense#4 budget#5 criminal justice

463

Votes Analyzed

Data sources: voteview, congress.gov

Political Position

Ideology Spectrum

0.61Very Conservative

Dale W. Strong's voting record places him on the conservative side of the political spectrum, with an ideology score of 0.606 on a scale from -1 (most liberal) to +1 (most conservative). This positions him to the right of the average Republican House member, whose score is approximately 0.520. In practical terms, he votes in line with conservative priorities more consistently than many of his fellow Republicans.

LiberalModerateConservative
Republican avg

Near the average for Republicans (0.52)

Data source: VoteView NOMINATE scores (UCLA/UC San Diego)

Policy Positions

Category Breakdown

463

total votes analyzed

Overview

Dale W. Strong represents Alabama in the U.S. House as a Republican who generally aligns with his party's positions while sometimes breaking from the majority on specific issues. Across 463 recorded votes, he has shown strong support for legislation related to criminal justice, technology, infrastructure, and energy policy, while voting against most labor-related and healthcare measures that have come to the floor. His voting record reveals consistent priorities in areas like taxation, where he supported 10 of 11 bills, and environment and energy, where he voted in favor of 30 out of 34 measures — often backing bills that limit federal environmental regulations, such as voting to disapprove certain EPA rules. On defense, he supported the majority of measures but notably voted against War Powers Resolution efforts to withdraw U.S. forces from Lebanon, indicating support for maintaining military deployments. Strong's record also includes some votes that cross typical party expectations. He voted in favor of impeaching President Trump in September 2026, a position that placed him among a minority of House Republicans. On foreign policy, he voted against more bills than he supported, suggesting a selective approach to international engagement. His near-unanimous support for technology and infrastructure bills points to areas where he may find common ground with members across the aisle.

Key Positions

  • •Voted to impeach President Donald Trump in September 2026, breaking with the majority of his party on this high-profile vote.
  • •Consistently supported energy legislation that limits federal environmental regulations, including voting to disapprove an EPA rule on California harbor craft emissions standards and backing the Ratepayer Protection Act.
  • •Voted against War Powers Resolution measures that would have directed the President to withdraw U.S. forces from Lebanon, supporting the continuation of military operations there.
  • •Supported all 13 criminal justice measures that came to a vote, including the Prison Staff Safety Enhancement Act and resolutions honoring law enforcement officers killed in the line of duty.
  • •Opposed most labor-related legislation, voting in favor of only 1 out of 5 labor bills.
  • •Supported the fiscal year 2027 congressional budget and continuing appropriations to fund the government.
  • •Voted against most healthcare measures, supporting only 4 of 9 bills in that category.
  • •Backed all technology and infrastructure bills that came to a vote, supporting 10 of 10 technology measures and 5 of 5 infrastructure measures.

By Policy Area

Other276
71% yea5% other24% nay
Environment & Energy34
88% yea3% other9% nay
Defense25
64% yea36% nay
Budget & Spending23
83% yea17% nay
Criminal Justice13
100% yea0% nay
Taxation11
91% yea9% nay
Foreign Policy11
45% yea55% nay
Technology10
100% yea0% nay
Healthcare9
44% yea56% nay
Education9
78% yea22% nay
Agriculture8
63% yea38% nay
Immigration8
63% yea38% nay
Housing8
88% yea13% nay
Infrastructure5
100% yea0% nay
Labor5
20% yea20% other60% nay

Analysis updated: September 18, 2026

Campaign Finance

Follow the Money

Includes all authorized campaign committees (principal committee, joint fundraising, and other authorized committees). Outside spending by Super PACs and independent groups is shown separately below.

Verify on FEC.gov →

Career: $4.8M

Fundraising Over Time

Raised per election cycleSpent

Contribution Sources

Individual$687K

52%

PAC / Committees$631K

48%

Individual Breakdown

Itemized (>$200)

$680K

Small Dollar (<$200)

$7K

Donation Sizes

Under $200
$9K · 1%
$200 – 499
$8K · 1%
$500 – 999
$53K · 6%
$1,000 – 1,999
$147K · 17%
$2,000+
$629K · 74%

Share of individual contribution dollars by donation size, current election cycle.

Where the Money Comes From

In-state (AL)$522K · 62%
Out-of-state$317K · 38%

Itemized individual contributions only (donations over $200 report the donor's state). Small-dollar donations are not included because the FEC does not itemize them.

AL (home)
$522K
VA
$116K
FL
$41K
DC
$28K
TN
$21K
NC
$17K
CA
$16K
MD
$12K

Top Contributors

See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded

Top Contributing Industries

Top Donor Employers

RETIRED$45K
NULL$35K
HOMEMAKER$23K
SELF EMPLOYED$16K
RYE ENGINEERING PLC$15K
IGNITE$14K
MONTE SANO RESEARCH CORP$14K
GRAYSON CARTER CONTRACTING$13K
CORVID TECHNOLOGIES$12K
TORCH TECHNOLOGIES$12K
TRIDEUM$10K
C2 STRATEGIES$10K

Employer as self-reported by itemized donors. “Not Employed” and “Self-Employed” typically rank highest for small-dollar campaigns and include retirees.

Where the Money Goes

Spending by Purpose

Other / Uncategorized
$568K
Contributions
$63K
Administrative
$25K
Fundraising
$5K
Advertising
$3K

Purpose categories are self-reported on FEC filings; large “Other” totals are common.

Top Payees

1.

FUNDRAISING INC.

$159K
2.

CROSBY OTTENHOFF GROUP

$113K
3.

MAIN STREET STRATEGIES

$60K
4.

CARD SERVICES CENTER

$43K
5.

PRESNALL, BRAD

$42K
6.

NRCC

$35K
7.

FIRST NATIONAL BANK

$34K
8.

MCLAUGHLIN & ASSOCIATES

$33K

Detailed Breakdown

Expenditures

Operating Costs

$587K

Operating Offsets

$6K

Net Operating

$581K

Refunds

Individual Refunds

$14K

Committee Refunds

$11K

Outside Spending (Super PACs)

Supporting

$460K

Opposing

$985K

Total Outside Spending

$1.4M

Top Outside Spenders

01

HOUSE FREEDOM ACTION

-$873K
$873K
02

AMERICAN DREAM FEDERAL ACTION

+$399K
$399K
03

AMERICA FIRST ALABAMA PAC

-$113K
$113K
04

DEFEND OUR VALUES PAC (DOV PAC)

+$61K
$61K

Independent expenditures are made without coordination with the candidate. Source: FEC Schedule E filings.

Coverage: 1/1/2025 – 6/30/2026FEC: H2AL05102Updated: 8/12/2026Source: FEC.gov (all authorized committees)