Skip to content

Voting Profile

Legislative Record

770 votes analyzed

Most Active Policy Areas

#1 other#2 healthcare#3 environment energy#4 defense#5 budget

770

Votes Analyzed

Data sources: voteview, congress.gov

Political Position

Ideology Spectrum

-0.29Moderate Liberal

Senator Christopher Murphy holds a moderate liberal position within the Democratic Party. His NOMINATE ideology score of -0.287 places him closer to the political center than the average Senate Democrat (whose score is approximately -0.380). This means that while he generally aligns with his party on most issues, he occasionally breaks from the Democratic mainstream and is considered one of the more centrist members of his caucus.

LiberalModerateConservative
Democrat avg

Near the average for Democrats (-0.38)

Data source: VoteView NOMINATE scores (UCLA/UC San Diego)

Policy Positions

Category Breakdown

770

total votes analyzed

Overview

Senator Christopher Murphy of Connecticut has cast 770 recorded votes across a wide range of policy areas. His voting record shows strongest engagement in healthcare, environment and energy, and defense policy — the three categories where he has cast the most votes. On healthcare, Murphy has supported the majority of measures that came before him, voting in favor roughly 59% of the time. His votes include support for measures addressing insurance company practices in patient care access. In defense and foreign policy, he has consistently voted to assert congressional authority over military action, including votes to direct the removal of U.S. forces from unauthorized hostilities. His foreign policy voting pattern is notable for an exceptionally low yea rate (under 2%), suggesting he frequently opposed the foreign policy measures that reached the Senate floor during this period. Murphy has shown a pattern of supporting government accountability measures, including voting to withhold senators' pay during government shutdowns and supporting appropriations for oversight of detention facilities. On trade, he supported the large majority of measures (83%), making it one of his highest approval categories. His environmental votes reflect a mixed record — he supported some regulatory measures, such as those related to chemical reporting requirements, while opposing others. Overall, Murphy's record reflects a senator who generally votes with his party but demonstrates some independence, particularly compared to the average Democrat. His most active areas of legislative engagement — healthcare, environment, and defense — align with issues of particular importance to Connecticut voters.

Key Positions

  • •Consistently voted to require congressional authorization for military action, including multiple votes supporting resolutions to direct the removal of U.S. forces from hostilities against Iran.
  • •Supported measures to prevent insurance companies from stepping between patients and their doctors, voting in favor of a point of order against reconciliation legislation that failed to address prior authorization practices.
  • •Voted to withhold senators' pay during government shutdowns, signaling support for congressional accountability.
  • •Supported environmental reporting requirements, including voting to disapprove the rollback of PFAS chemical reporting and recordkeeping rules under the Toxic Substances Control Act.
  • •Opposed the majority of foreign policy measures that came to a vote, with only 1 yea vote out of 54 total foreign policy votes — the lowest approval rate among all his voting categories.
  • •Supported the large majority of trade-related measures, voting yea on 5 of 6 trade bills (83%) — his highest approval rate by category.
  • •Voted against the fiscal year 2027 defense authorization bill while supporting congressional oversight of military engagements, suggesting a distinction between supporting defense oversight and supporting specific defense spending levels.

By Policy Area

Other234
10% yea3% other87% nay
Healthcare116
59% yea2% other39% nay
Environment & Energy82
32% yea6% other62% nay
Defense68
56% yea44% nay
Budget & Spending56
27% yea73% nay
Foreign Policy54
2% yea5% other93% nay
Immigration27
15% yea7% other78% nay
Taxation25
28% yea72% nay
Banking & Finance22
41% yea59% nay
Agriculture21
43% yea5% other52% nay
Education13
23% yea77% nay
Infrastructure13
23% yea8% other69% nay
Housing12
33% yea67% nay
Social Security9
44% yea56% nay
Labor6
17% yea83% nay
Trade6
83% yea17% nay

Analysis updated: September 18, 2026

Campaign Finance

Follow the Money

Includes all authorized campaign committees (principal committee, joint fundraising, and other authorized committees). Outside spending by Super PACs and independent groups is shown separately below.

Verify on FEC.gov →

Career: $54.3M

Fundraising Over Time

Raised per election cycleSpent

Contribution Sources

Individual$12.3M

100%

Individual Breakdown

Itemized (>$200)

$4.1M

Small Dollar (<$200)

$8.2M

Donation Sizes

Under $200
$10.7M · 83%
$200 – 499
$738K · 6%
$500 – 999
$594K · 5%
$1,000 – 1,999
$495K · 4%
$2,000+
$287K · 2%

Share of individual contribution dollars by donation size, current election cycle.

Where the Money Comes From

In-state (CT)$1.4M · 32%
Out-of-state$3.1M · 68%

Itemized individual contributions only (donations over $200 report the donor's state). Small-dollar donations are not included because the FEC does not itemize them.

CT (home)
$1.4M
CA
$584K
NY
$448K
MA
$249K
FL
$169K
IL
$123K
MD
$108K
VA
$108K

Top Contributors

See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded

Top Contributing Industries

Top Donor Employers

NOT EMPLOYED$2.9M
SELF EMPLOYED$268K
SELF$194K
RETIRED$33K
NONE$28K
YALE UNIVERSITY$16K
GOOGLE$12K
MASS GENERAL HOSPITAL$12K
THE BAUPOST GROUP L.L.C.$10K
NA$7K
ACCENTURE$7K
GIBSON DUNN & CRUTCHER$7K

Employer as self-reported by itemized donors. “Not Employed” and “Self-Employed” typically rank highest for small-dollar campaigns and include retirees.

Where the Money Goes

Spending by Purpose

Other / Uncategorized
$7.1M
Administrative
$65K
Refunds
$62K
Transfers
$29K
Fundraising
$25K
Advertising
$19K
Materials
$12K
Contributions
$3K

Purpose categories are self-reported on FEC filings; large “Other” totals are common.

Top Payees

1.

AISLE 518 STRATEGIES LLC

$4.9M
2.

ACTBLUE TECHNICAL SERVICES

$479K
3.

AMERICAN EXPRESS

$436K
4.

NGP VAN, INC.

$190K
5.

STRAUS/BAKER LLC

$121K
6.

PAYCHEX

$116K
7.

POLITICAL COMPLIANCE MANAGEMENT SERVICES

$102K
8.

ELIAS LAW GROUP

$84K

Detailed Breakdown

Expenditures

Operating Costs

$7.2M

Operating Offsets

$8K

Net Operating

$7.2M

Refunds

Individual Refunds

$75K

Committee Refunds

$3K

Outside Spending (Super PACs)

Supporting

$2.9M

Opposing

$207K

Total Outside Spending

$3.1M

Top Outside Spenders

01

CONNECTICUT'S FUTURE PAC INC

+$1.3M
$1.3M
02

WORKING FOR US POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE INC

+$624K
$624K
03

ENVIRONMENT AMERICA ACTION FUND

+$366K
$366K
04

ARDA-ROC

+$252K
$252K
05

NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION INSTITUTE FOR LEGISLATIVE ACTION

-$163K
$163K
06

NATIONAL EMERGENCY MEDICINE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE

+$96K
$96K
07

HUMANE SOCIETY LEGISLATIVE FUND

+$88K
$88K
08

UNITE HERE TIP STATE & LOCAL FUND

+$78K
$78K

Independent expenditures are made without coordination with the candidate. Source: FEC Schedule E filings.

Coverage: 1/1/2025 – 6/30/2026FEC: S2CT00132Updated: 8/12/2026Source: FEC.gov (all authorized committees)
Christopher Murphy — U.S. Senator for Connecticut: Voting Record & Donors | True Vote