Skip to content

Voting Profile

Legislative Record

703 votes analyzed

Most Active Policy Areas

#1 other#2 healthcare#3 environment energy#4 defense#5 foreign policy

703

Votes Analyzed

Data sources: voteview, congress.gov

Political Position

Ideology Spectrum

-0.24Moderate Liberal

Senator Coons holds a moderate liberal position within the Democratic Party. His NOMINATE ideology score of -0.238 places him noticeably closer to the political center than the average Senate Democrat (approximately -0.38), meaning he is one of the more centrist members of his party. In practical terms, he generally aligns with Democratic priorities but has shown a willingness to take positions that diverge from his party's mainstream on certain issues.

LiberalModerateConservative
Democrat avg

More conservative than the average Democrat (-0.38)

Data source: VoteView NOMINATE scores (UCLA/UC San Diego)

Policy Positions

Category Breakdown

703

total votes analyzed

Overview

Senator Christopher A. Coons represents Delaware in the U.S. Senate as a Democrat. With 703 recorded votes across a wide range of policy areas, he has built a voting record that spans healthcare, defense, environment and energy, foreign policy, budget matters, and more. His voting patterns reflect a legislator who consistently supports Democratic positions on most issues while occasionally breaking from his party, particularly on defense and trade matters. On healthcare, Senator Coons has voted in favor of measures aimed at lowering out-of-pocket costs and has supported congressional oversight of federal health agency rules. In the defense arena, he has backed measures requiring congressional authorization for military action, including votes supporting resolutions to direct the removal of U.S. forces from unauthorized hostilities involving Iran. On environment and energy issues, he has supported measures related to chemical safety reporting and environmental regulation. His voting record on trade stands out as an area where he has supported a majority of the measures brought to a vote, with a 66.7% yea rate — one of his highest across all categories. On budget and taxation matters, his voting patterns are more mixed, reflecting a selective approach to fiscal policy proposals. His overall profile is that of a center-left senator who engages substantively across a broad range of policy areas.

Key Positions

  • •Voted in favor of requiring congressional authorization before military action against Iran, supporting this position on multiple votes in July 2026.
  • •Supported a resolution disapproving of changes to CDC leadership, voting against the confirmation of a nominee for CDC Director in August 2026.
  • •Voted to create a procedural safeguard requiring that budget reconciliation legislation demonstrate it would lower out-of-pocket healthcare costs for Americans.
  • •Supported maintaining environmental reporting requirements for PFAS chemicals under the Toxic Substances Control Act.
  • •Voted against the fiscal year 2027 defense authorization bill in July 2026, suggesting concerns about specific provisions in the legislation.
  • •Showed a pattern of opposing many executive branch nominations in the foreign policy and related domains, voting against multiple Treasury and intelligence nominees.
  • •Supported trade-related measures at a higher rate (66.7% yea) than most other policy categories, indicating relative openness to trade legislation.

By Policy Area

Other231
17% yea8% other75% nay
Healthcare82
55% yea4% other41% nay
Environment & Energy81
30% yea7% other63% nay
Defense67
52% yea8% other40% nay
Foreign Policy54
17% yea7% other76% nay
Budget & Spending46
20% yea6% other74% nay
Immigration27
22% yea8% other70% nay
Taxation24
46% yea4% other50% nay
Banking & Finance20
40% yea5% other55% nay
Infrastructure13
38% yea8% other54% nay
Education13
23% yea77% nay
Housing12
42% yea8% other50% nay
Agriculture9
11% yea89% nay
Social Security7
29% yea71% nay
Trade6
67% yea33% nay
Labor5
20% yea80% nay

Analysis updated: September 18, 2026

Campaign Finance

Follow the Money

Includes all authorized campaign committees (principal committee, joint fundraising, and other authorized committees). Outside spending by Super PACs and independent groups is shown separately below.

Verify on FEC.gov →

Career: $23.9M

Fundraising Over Time

Raised per election cycleSpent

Contribution Sources

Individual$3.6M

63%

PAC / Committees$2.1M

37%

Individual Breakdown

Itemized (>$200)

$3.4M

Small Dollar (<$200)

$184K

Donation Sizes

Under $200
$111K · 4%
$200 – 499
$41K · 2%
$500 – 999
$189K · 7%
$1,000 – 1,999
$570K · 22%
$2,000+
$1.7M · 65%

Share of individual contribution dollars by donation size, current election cycle.

Where the Money Comes From

In-state (DE)$263K · 10%
Out-of-state$2.3M · 90%

Itemized individual contributions only (donations over $200 report the donor's state). Small-dollar donations are not included because the FEC does not itemize them.

CA
$618K
NY
$490K
DE (home)
$263K
PA
$162K
MD
$152K
DC
$142K
VA
$122K
MA
$104K

Top Contributors

See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded

Top Contributing Industries

Top Donor Employers

NOT EMPLOYED$496K
SELF-EMPLOYED$152K
YOUNG CONAWAY STARGATT & TAYLOR LLP$129K
APOLLO GLOBAL MANAGEMENT$50K
LOCKHEED MARTIN$33K
CAPITAL GROUP$24K
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN$22K
LEIDOS$21K
BLACKSTONE$20K
CAPITAL GROUP COMPANIES$18K
K&L GATES LLP$17K
GIBSON DUNN & CRUTCHER$16K

Employer as self-reported by itemized donors. “Not Employed” and “Self-Employed” typically rank highest for small-dollar campaigns and include retirees.

Where the Money Goes

Spending by Purpose

Other / Uncategorized
$1.3M
Materials
$33K
Advertising
$33K
Refunds
$27K
Administrative
$19K
Transfers
$13K
Fundraising
$7K

Purpose categories are self-reported on FEC filings; large “Other” totals are common.

Top Payees

1.

FULKERSON, KENNEDY & CO.

$330K
2.

PAYROLL MANAGEMENT ASSISTANCE

$226K
3.

GPS IMPACT

$156K
4.

FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF OMAHA

$147K
5.

CAPITOL COMPLIANCE ASSOCIATES, INC.

$102K
6.

JBW CONSULTING, LLC

$76K
7.

HARBOR LIGHT STRATEGIES LLC

$67K
8.

DEMOCRATIC STATE COMMITTEE (DELAWARE)

$46K

Detailed Breakdown

Expenditures

Operating Costs

$2.9M

Operating Offsets

$5K

Net Operating

$2.9M

Refunds

Individual Refunds

$35K

Committee Refunds

$15K

Outside Spending (Super PACs)

Supporting

$38K

Opposing

$315K

Total Outside Spending

$353K

Top Outside Spenders

01

NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA POLITICAL VICTORY FUND

+$26K-$211K
$237K
02

FIRST AMENDMENT ALLIANCE

-$82K
$82K
03

LET FREEDOM RING INC

-$14K
$14K
04

AMERICAN WORKER INC, THE

+$8K
$8K
05

THE NATIONAL REPUBLICAN TRUST PAC

-$7K
$7K
06

NARAL Pro-Choice America

+$3K
$3K
07

OUR COUNTRY DESERVES BETTER PAC - TEAPARTYEXPRESS.ORG

-$1K
$1K
08

CARE ACTION

+$1K
$1K

Independent expenditures are made without coordination with the candidate. Source: FEC Schedule E filings.

Coverage: 1/1/2021 – 6/30/2026FEC: S0DE00092Updated: 8/12/2026Source: FEC.gov (all authorized committees)
Christopher A. Coons — U.S. Senator for Delaware: Voting Record & Donors | True Vote