Skip to content
Official portrait of Adelita S. Grijalva, U.S. Representative for Arizona

U.S. Representative

Adelita S. Grijalva

Arizona District 7

DemocratVery Progressive

Votes on Record

262

across 17 categories

Write Letter

Contact

202-225-2435Official Website

1203 Longworth House Office Building Washington DC 20515-0307

Voting Profile

Legislative Record

262 votes analyzed

Most Active Policy Areas

#1 other#2 environment energy#3 budget#4 defense#5 foreign policy

262

Votes Analyzed

Data sources: voteview, congress.gov

Political Position

Ideology Spectrum

-0.72Very Progressive

Rep. Adelita Grijalva holds a NOMINATE ideology score of -0.716, which places her well to the left of the average House Democrat (around -0.38). In plain terms, she consistently supports progressive policy positions and is among the more liberal members of her party. Voters can expect her to favor expanded government programs, environmental protections, and labor rights more strongly than many of her Democratic colleagues.

LiberalModerateConservative
Democrat avg

More liberal than the average Democrat (-0.38)

Data source: VoteView NOMINATE scores (UCLA/UC San Diego)

Policy Positions

Category Breakdown

262

total votes analyzed

Overview

Adelita Grijalva represents Arizona in the U.S. House as a Democrat with a strongly progressive voting record. Across 262 recorded votes, she has shown clear patterns: consistent support for labor protections, environmental regulations, and foreign policy measures that limit military engagement abroad, while regularly opposing Republican-led budget proposals and criminal justice bills. On fiscal matters, Grijalva voted against nearly all major budget resolutions during this Congress, including the fiscal year 2027 budget and continuing appropriations measures. She supported all four labor-related votes that came before her and backed most defense bills focused on veterans' care. In foreign policy, she repeatedly voted in favor of War Powers Resolution measures directing the withdrawal of U.S. forces from Iran and Lebanon. Her environmental record shows support for ratepayer protections and water resource development, while opposing measures that would roll back EPA authority over state pollution control standards. On taxation, she supported five of seven tax-related votes. Her record on technology, education, and immigration is more limited, with relatively few votes in those categories so far this term. Overall, Grijalva's voting pattern reflects a member who prioritizes workers' rights, environmental standards, restraint in military deployments, and opposition to spending plans she views as insufficient or misdirected. Her record is consistent with the progressive wing of the Democratic Party.

Key Positions

  • •Voted in favor of all labor-related measures that came to the floor, supporting worker protections in every instance (4 of 4 votes).
  • •Consistently voted to invoke the War Powers Resolution to direct withdrawal of U.S. forces from Iran (votes in June, July, and September 2026) and Lebanon (votes in June and July 2026), reflecting a pattern of seeking congressional oversight over military engagements.
  • •Opposed the fiscal year 2027 congressional budget resolution and a continuing appropriations measure in July 2026, reflecting disagreement with the majority's spending priorities.
  • •Voted against a measure to disapprove EPA rules related to California's harbor craft pollution control standards, siding with maintaining stricter environmental regulations.
  • •Supported the Ratepayer Protection Act and the Water Resources Development Act, indicating backing for consumer energy protections and infrastructure investment.
  • •Supported the Take Care of America's Veterans Act in July 2026, voting for expanded veterans' services.
  • •Opposed the majority of budget and appropriations bills, voting Nay on 14 of 16 budget-related measures.

By Policy Area

Other150
58% yea1% other41% nay
Environment & Energy20
55% yea45% nay
Budget & Spending16
13% yea88% nay
Defense14
64% yea15% other21% nay
Foreign Policy10
80% yea20% nay
Housing7
43% yea57% nay
Criminal Justice7
29% yea71% nay
Taxation7
71% yea29% nay
Technology6
50% yea50% nay
Agriculture5
60% yea40% nay

Analysis updated: September 18, 2026

Campaign Finance

Follow the Money

Includes all authorized campaign committees (principal committee, joint fundraising, and other authorized committees). Outside spending by Super PACs and independent groups is shown separately below.

Verify on FEC.gov →

Contribution Sources

Individual$1.8M

81%

PAC / Committees$436K

19%

Individual Breakdown

Itemized (>$200)

$825K

Small Dollar (<$200)

$1.0M

Donation Sizes

Under $200
$1.1M · 62%
$200 – 499
$111K · 6%
$500 – 999
$170K · 9%
$1,000 – 1,999
$171K · 9%
$2,000+
$254K · 14%

Share of individual contribution dollars by donation size, current election cycle.

Where the Money Comes From

In-state (AZ)$501K · 61%
Out-of-state$319K · 39%

Itemized individual contributions only (donations over $200 report the donor's state). Small-dollar donations are not included because the FEC does not itemize them.

AZ (home)
$501K
CA
$54K
DC
$50K
MD
$30K
TX
$25K
NY
$16K
MA
$15K
WA
$14K

Top Contributors

See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded

Top Contributing Industries

Top Donor Employers

N/A$360K
SELF-EMPLOYED$86K
NULL$44K
PIMA COUNTY$18K
UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA$15K
NEXXUS CONSULTING$8K
CITY OF TUCSON$7K
DWE MANAGEMENT INC$7K
TEP$6K
PERRY, WHITE, ROSS AND JACOBSON$5K
HERRERA ARELLANO LLP$5K
SUVIDA HEALTHCARE$5K

Employer as self-reported by itemized donors. “Not Employed” and “Self-Employed” typically rank highest for small-dollar campaigns and include retirees.

Where the Money Goes

Spending by Purpose

Other / Uncategorized
$1.5M
Administrative
$185K
Advertising
$96K
Materials
$24K
Refunds
$21K
Fundraising
$19K
Contributions
$15K
Events
$7K

Purpose categories are self-reported on FEC filings; large “Other” totals are common.

Top Payees

1.

CONEXION POLITICAL LLC

$460K
2.

CAMPAIGNOLOGY LLC

$240K
3.

GRASSROOTS ANALYTICS

$152K
4.

CONVERGENCE TARGETED COMMUNICATIONS

$147K
5.

GUSTO

$69K
6.

KATZ COMPLIANCE

$52K
7.

STRIPE

$52K
8.

THE GLOO FACTORY

$49K

Detailed Breakdown

Expenditures

Operating Costs

$1.8M

Operating Offsets

$8K

Net Operating

$1.8M

Refunds

Individual Refunds

$24K

Committee Refunds

$19K

Outside Spending (Super PACs)

Supporting

$1.2M

Opposing

$424K

Total Outside Spending

$1.6M

Top Outside Spenders

01

TUCSON FAMILIES FED UP PAC

-$424K
$424K
02

WORKING FAMILIES PARTY PAC

+$405K
$405K
03

PROGRESSIVE PROMISE

+$391K
$391K
04

CONGRESSIONAL PROGRESSIVE CAUCUS PAC

+$160K
$160K
05

LCV VICTORY FUND

+$120K
$120K
06

AMERICAS FUTURE PROJECT PAC

+$35K
$35K
07

MEDICARE FOR ALL

+$20K
$20K
08

VOTE NURSES VALUES POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE: CALIFORNIA NURSES ASSOCIATION

+$20K
$20K

Independent expenditures are made without coordination with the candidate. Source: FEC Schedule E filings.

Coverage: 4/1/2025 – 7/1/2026FEC: H6AZ07121Updated: 8/12/2026Source: FEC.gov (all authorized committees)
Adelita S. Grijalva — U.S. Representative for Arizona 7: Voting Record & Donors | True Vote