Skip to content

Voting Profile

Legislative Record

816 votes analyzed

Most Active Policy Areas

#1 other#2 healthcare#3 budget#4 environment energy#5 defense

816

Votes Analyzed

Data sources: voteview, congress.gov

Political Position

Ideology Spectrum

-0.35Progressive

Adam Schiff's NOMINATE ideology score of -0.352 places him in the progressive wing of American politics. However, compared to the average Senate Democrat score of -0.380, he sits slightly closer to the political center than most members of his party. In practical terms, he votes with the Democratic mainstream on most issues but occasionally breaks from the most progressive positions.

LiberalModerateConservative
Democrat avg

Near the average for Democrats (-0.38)

Data source: VoteView NOMINATE scores (UCLA/UC San Diego)

Policy Positions

Category Breakdown

816

total votes analyzed

Overview

Senator Adam Schiff of California has compiled 816 votes across a wide range of policy areas during his time in the U.S. Senate. His voting record spans healthcare, budget, defense, foreign policy, environment and energy, agriculture, immigration, and other topics, giving voters a substantial body of evidence to evaluate his priorities. On healthcare, Schiff has voted in favor of most measures that came before him, supporting roughly two-thirds of healthcare-related bills. He voted in favor of a resolution opposing insurance company prior authorization practices that delay patient care, and voted against the confirmation of a nominee to lead the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. On defense and foreign policy, he supported measures requiring congressional authorization before military action against Iran, while voting against the annual defense authorization bill. His foreign policy votes show a pattern of opposing most measures in this category, suggesting disagreement with the direction of recent foreign policy legislation. Schiff's budget and fiscal votes lean toward opposition, with roughly one-third yea votes. He supported a resolution that would withhold senator pay during government shutdowns, indicating support for government accountability measures. On environment and energy, he opposed most legislation in this area but supported measures related to PFAS chemical reporting requirements. His immigration votes show strong opposition to recent immigration legislation, voting yea on only about 11 percent of those bills. Across trade, agriculture, and housing, Schiff shows more willingness to vote in favor of legislation, with support rates above 50 percent in each category. This pattern suggests he evaluates certain economic and domestic policy bills on their individual merits rather than voting strictly along party lines in every instance.

Key Positions

  • •Voted in favor of requiring congressional authorization for military action against Iran, supporting this position across multiple procedural votes in July 2026.
  • •Supported a resolution opposing insurance company prior authorization practices that delay or deny patient access to care, voting yea in April 2026.
  • •Voted against the fiscal year 2027 defense authorization bill in July 2026, one of his notable nay votes in the defense category where he otherwise supported 58 percent of measures.
  • •Supported withholding senator pay during government shutdowns, voting yea on that resolution in May 2026.
  • •Voted in favor of maintaining PFAS chemical reporting and recordkeeping requirements under the Toxic Substances Control Act.
  • •Opposed the CDC director nomination of Erica Schwartz of Florida in August 2026.
  • •Voted against reconciliation provisions related to voter identification requirements for federal elections in April 2026.
  • •Showed consistent opposition to most immigration-related legislation, voting yea on only 3 of 27 immigration votes.

By Policy Area

Other225
13% yea4% other83% nay
Healthcare160
64% yea36% nay
Budget & Spending77
32% yea3% other65% nay
Environment & Energy64
17% yea5% other78% nay
Defense60
58% yea42% nay
Foreign Policy55
7% yea6% other87% nay
Agriculture38
55% yea45% nay
Immigration27
11% yea8% other81% nay
Taxation26
46% yea4% other50% nay
Banking & Finance21
29% yea71% nay
Education15
33% yea67% nay
Housing13
54% yea46% nay
Infrastructure11
18% yea82% nay
Social Security7
29% yea14% other57% nay
Trade6
67% yea33% nay
Labor5
40% yea60% nay

Analysis updated: September 18, 2026

Campaign Finance

Follow the Money

Includes all authorized campaign committees (principal committee, joint fundraising, and other authorized committees). Outside spending by Super PACs and independent groups is shown separately below.

Verify on FEC.gov →

Career: $57.0M

Fundraising Over Time

Raised per election cycleSpent

Contribution Sources

Individual$7.2M

99%

PAC / Committees$69K

1%

Individual Breakdown

Itemized (>$200)

$2.8M

Small Dollar (<$200)

$4.4M

Donation Sizes

Under $200
$5.6M · 73%
$200 – 499
$519K · 7%
$500 – 999
$312K · 4%
$1,000 – 1,999
$375K · 5%
$2,000+
$921K · 12%

Share of individual contribution dollars by donation size, current election cycle.

Where the Money Comes From

In-state (CA)$1.9M · 56%
Out-of-state$1.5M · 44%

Itemized individual contributions only (donations over $200 report the donor's state). Small-dollar donations are not included because the FEC does not itemize them.

CA (home)
$1.9M
NY
$218K
FL
$102K
WA
$101K
MA
$98K
TX
$69K
IL
$64K
VA
$58K

Top Contributors

See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded
See everyone they funded

Top Contributing Industries

Top Donor Employers

NOT EMPLOYED$2.1M
SELF EMPLOYED$312K
NONE$35K
NULL$20K
BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA$11K
APOLLO GLOBAL MANAGEMENT$10K
STATE OF CALIFORNIA$10K
GARFIELD HEALTH CENTER$7K
CREATIVE ARTISTS AGENCY$7K
KLEINER PERKINS CAUFIELD & BYERS$7K
RIPPLE INC.$7K
PROSPECT ADVISORS$7K

Employer as self-reported by itemized donors. “Not Employed” and “Self-Employed” typically rank highest for small-dollar campaigns and include retirees.

Where the Money Goes

Spending by Purpose

Other / Uncategorized
$4.0M
Fundraising
$708K
Refunds
$99K
Travel
$89K
Administrative
$32K
Materials
$4K
Advertising
$2K

Purpose categories are self-reported on FEC filings; large “Other” totals are common.

Top Payees

1.

AUTHENTIC CAMPAIGNS, INC.

$1.2M
2.

FDM CONNECTS LLC

$642K
3.

NGP VAN, INC.

$490K
4.

PAYROLL DATA PROCESSING INC.

$441K
5.

PETERS, ALLI

$316K
6.

ACTBLUE TECHNICAL SERVICES

$193K
7.

CAPITAL STRATEGIES

$182K
8.

ELIAS LAW GROUP

$146K

Detailed Breakdown

Expenditures

Operating Costs

$4.8M

Operating Offsets

$725K

Net Operating

$4.1M

Refunds

Individual Refunds

$124K

Committee Refunds

$3K

Outside Spending (Super PACs)

Supporting

$425K

Opposing

$19.62

Total Outside Spending

$425K

Top Outside Spenders

01

STANDING STRONG PAC

+$345K
$345K
02

DMFI PAC

+$44K
$44K
03

BLUEWAVEAMERICA LLC

+$9K
$9K
04

PLANNED PARENTHOOD AFFILIATES OF CALIFORNIA VOTES PAC

+$6K
$6K
05

INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIREFIGHTERS INTERESTED IN REGISTRATION AND EDUCATION PAC

+$6K
$6K
06

SAN FRANCISCO DEMOCRATIC COUNTY CENTRAL COMMITTEE

+$4K
$4K
07

DEMOCRATIC CLUB OF THE CONEJO VALLEY - FEDERAL

+$2K
$2K
08

CULVER CITY DEMOCRATS UNITED

+$2K
$2K

Independent expenditures are made without coordination with the candidate. Source: FEC Schedule E filings.

Coverage: 1/1/2025 – 6/30/2026FEC: S4CA00555Updated: 8/12/2026Source: FEC.gov (all authorized committees)
Adam B. Schiff — U.S. Senator for California: Voting Record & Donors | True Vote