Nick Carducci

Nick Carducci was born in Red Bank, New Jersey. He earned a bachelor's degree from Johns Hopkins University in 2015. His career experience includes working as a product manager. He has been affiliated with Thumbprint.us - Social Calendar.[1]

Who are you? Tell us about yourself.

I'm eager to live in a steady state economy, to which each marginal hour per capita lesses the cost of living. The other two parties are concerted in their efforts to impress the phillips curve, to which an hour of work begets more real consumption velocity, if not higher prices, instead of leisure.

Please list below 3 key messages of your campaign. What are the main points you want voters to remember about your goals for your time in office?

Suplex the phillips curve over utility. The Senate is to make the treasury operations guide a more atomic economy as per productivity as well as the advertised-intent of the Constitution.Save the rats! Direct and honest consensual trade is omnipotent, if the Constitution were not withstanding. The right-to-try is tokenized in Liberty of the Preamble, only necessitated by minimal viable product duress for such closed-source ingredients.End the Fed. Salt bank depositary, reverse amortize current cash:debt * annual income so we all paid what we would have without payment installments, and target margin premium networks to rollover without social nor human capital (just commodities), and steward industry-specific royalty debentures as such awaits customers with private capital (yet with socialized production) with geohash/month report and two week financial disclosure with automated accounting software by electronic fund transfer service. Otherwise, go ahead and barter with commodities. Gifts are not discounted sales, but regular substantial business!

What areas of public policy are you personally passionate about?

I seek to delineate social production from private capital. I understand correlations and will advocate by way of the Preamble of the U.S. Constitution, for otherwise such is bad advice and grounds borne by hypocrisy as certain harm. I believe that Amendment 14.4 was a way to bandaid over a certain vulnerability in Article 1.8 that permits the federal government to abet states to hold taxes for free rider mutable scope unbarred as well as the direction of the general welfare and defense of the United States, and Article 4.4 on domestic Violence by name-determined, 'riots', namely the promise of Uniform taxes that bonds cannot abide, and electronic fund transfer transaction fees obviates. I believe all permits and desists should either pay members of public spaces, or a 11/12 industry-variable vertical, platform jurist-assertion, while only video or physical material admits suspects into a docket with 'free' lawyers. Education should be free as in documentation.

Who do you look up to? Whose example would you like to follow, and why?

Francesco Redi, Russel Brand, Ewan McGregor

Is there a book, essay, film, or something else you would recommend to someone who wants to understand your political philosophy?

Advanced Microeconomics: The Micro-Theory.com Podcast

What characteristics or principles are most important for an elected official?

Appropriations cannot go towards a subsidiary that which the office-holders' non-concurrentable, last-traded good will share is worth more than $100k. After I am in office, inflation will stop and Wall street employees will be bussing tables at restaurants my voters work at, to lower costs for all in an atomic and efficient labor market, known to the PhD tutelaries as the 'misery index'.

What do you believe are the core responsibilities for someone elected to this office?

The Senate is to look after the people of the United States with a mind towards Uniformity and Tranquility.

What was your very first job? How long did you have it?

I was a bookkeeper for my family business which has inspired me to fix the business cycles of the economy, and question why if stable prices and low unemployment is mandated, why is 2% inflation desired? There is history of population growth without an increase of GDP per person as the cost-of-living, after all.

If you are not a current senator, are there certain committees that you would want to be a part of?

I would take up Menendez titular head of the Foreign Affairs Committee, as well as Commerce, Science, and Transportation, Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs, Budget, Veteran's Affairs, Finance, Appropriations, Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions, Environment and Public Works, Energy and Natural Resources, Armed Services, Joint Economic Committee, Joint Committee on Taxation, Small Business and Entrepreneurship, Special Committee on Aging, Judiciary, Select Committee on Ethics and Intelligence.

Is there a particular senator, past or present, whom you want to model yourself after?

Not particularly. Bernie Sanders is said to have backed away from reimplementing the Glass-Steagall Act. Ron Paul hides his affinity for the financial industry, and will only End the Fed but not force banking into transaction and storage fees without lending, nor even force insurance into warehousing, and medical bills and tuition without debt at all, subject to the outright budget constraints of the individual or collective wholesale immediate settlement and not of exclusion by non-compete contracts. I appreciate the competition allowed by government making no monopolies with private industry, yet rather intervene like target margin networks or asserting minimal viable duress permits, of online and whistleblower-inclusive jury, and with appropriative damages as appropriations' beneficiary notwithstanding.

Do you believe that compromise is necessary or desirable for policymaking?

No. In fact, I believe appropriations and regulations should be reconciled for non-voters but for making things unconstitutional away from 'Liberty', 'Uniformity' or 'Tranquility' based on science without unmeasurable sets. Ranked choice or instant runoff voting forces a second vote for another, and explicit approval voting does not appropriately embargo the minority winners of the whole eligible voting population, not counting abstaining voters as no to any changes but for said repeals holds.