Bob Fioretti

Email editor@[the profile publisher].org to notify us of updates to this biography.

Bob Fioretti was born and lives in Chicago, Illinois. He graduated from Mendel High School. He earned a B.A. in political science from the University of Illinois, and a J.D. from Northern Illinois University. Fioretti’s career experience includes working as an attorney with the law firm of Orum & Roth. He oversaw the Historic Pullman Foundation and the Judicial Evaluation Committee of the Chicago Bar Association Executive Committee.[1]

Bob Fioretti has not yet completed [the profile publisher]'s 2026 Candidate Connection survey.

Send a message to Bob Fioretti asking him to fill out the survey.

If you are Bob Fioretti, click here to fill out [the profile publisher]'s 2026 Candidate Connection survey.

Who fills out the candidate survey?

Any candidate running for elected office, at any level, can complete [the profile publisher]'s Candidate Survey. Completing the survey will update the candidate's [the profile publisher] profile, letting voters know who they are and what they stand for.  More than 32,000 candidates have taken [the profile publisher]'s candidate survey since we launched it in 2015. Learn more about the survey here.

You can ask Bob Fioretti to fill out this survey by using the buttons below or emailing Bobforillinois@gmail.com.

Bob Fioretti did not complete [the profile publisher]'s 2024 Candidate Connection survey.

Bob Fioretti did not complete [the profile publisher]'s 2022 Candidate Connection survey.

Bob Fioretti did not complete [the profile publisher]'s 2020 Candidate Connection survey.

.survey-result {padding:10px;}

p.survey-question {font-weight:bold;}

p.survey-response {margin-left:10px;}

p.survey-response {white-space: pre-line;}

div.survey-scrollbox { height:400px; overflow:scroll; margin:20px; padding:10px; border:1px solid gray; }

Bob Fioretti did not complete [the profile publisher]'s Chicago candidates survey for 2019.

Campaign website

The following themes were found on Fioretti's 2019 campaign website.

Pensions

Chicago is on the hook for $42 billion in unfunded pension liabilities, which works out to $35,000 for every household. Those pensions, in the language of the Illinois Constitution, “shall not be diminished or impaired.”

I am not for reducing pension benefits for current city employees or retirees, either by Constitutional Amendment or by any other means. As the Supreme Court has ruled many times, these promises must be honored. I agree with those rulings. There already have been some reductions in pension benefits for new employees and I would pursue that avenue working with the unions to ensure that the pension funds always remain solvent.

Revenue

A Chicago casino: Yes, Chicago should have had a casino long ago. While I am not a huge fan of gambling, it is unconscionable to watch tens of thousands of Chicagoans regularly travel to Indiana or casinos in other Illinois towns. Chicago needs to keep that revenue in the city.

Legalized and taxed recreational marijuana: Yes, I was the only Mayoral candidate four years ago to advocate for this. As with gambling, I’m not a fan of using marijuana, but this train has left the station, and Chicago needs the revenue that will come with it.

A LaSalle Street tax: No, it isn’t doable or realistic.

A commuter tax: Yes, I advocated for a small commuter tax four years ago. With a balloon pension payment of nearly $400 million due within a year of the new Mayor taking office, the money will have to come from somewhere. If a candidate is against this, then they will be for a property tax increase.

A property tax increase: No. There will be no property tax increases in a Fioretti Administration. Too often, previous Administrations have used property owners as ATM machines. No more.

A municipal sales tax increase: No. Because of Cook County’s additional sales tax added by Toni Preckwinkle, Chicago and Cook County already has the highest sales tax in America and it is a hugely regressive tax hitting those at the bottom of the income scale the hardest.

A real estate transfer tax increase: No. As with the property tax, an increase in this tax will simply do more to drive residents out of Chicago. We should be welcoming people into Chicago, not taxing them out.

Video gambling: Yes. Again I want to emphasize that I am not a fan of gambling, but other cities and villages in Illinois realize vast revenue from this source, without the recognizable problems that anti-gambling activists have warned about. The time has come to lift the ban in Chicago on video gambling.

I would be more aggressive in joining in appeals of egregious errors in property tax assessments. Under-assessments cost every other taxpayer when they have to make up the difference from the error in assessment.

Police Reform

The City of Chicago has entered into a federally monitored consent decree to overhaul the training and practices of the Chicago Police Department. Civil libertarians say it is long overdue, but others say it is unnecessary and could make it tougher for the police to do their job.

Federal consent decrees seem to follow Garry McCarthy around like the plague. The decree will cost the city $25 million in the first year. We can call that the “McCarthy tax.” It is clear some reforms were needed, especially as regards to training and use of force guidelines. Strong leadership from City Hall, which has been sorely absent, working with all stakeholders could have formulated these changes without the need of monitoring by the federal government. Another concern I have is that this was driven by politics and not policy. What was the rush to get this done before a new Mayor takes office? The Mayor seems more concerned with a “legacy” than with getting it right.

Guns

What should Chicago do to reduce the number of illegal guns?

I support the recent legislation increasing maximum prison sentences for those who use illegal guns to commit violent crimes. Due to Supreme Court rulings, we must look to Springfield and Washington for help in limiting the number of illegal guns that come into our city from other states or other parts of Illinois. Laws that affect the trafficking of illegal guns including limiting bulk gun sales, cracking down on straw buyers, and toughening enforcement against “bad apple” gun dealers (90% of guns used in criminal acts can be traced to 5% of gun dealers. This is no coincidence), and closing the loopholes in buying guns without a background check, must be done at the state and federal level.

Violent Crime

It is a complex problem, not just limited to illegal guns. The solutions are also complex. The most important thing is to invest in our neighborhoods, ensuring excellent schools and good jobs are not limited to the downtown area. Next, is re-opening the mental health clinics that were closed in a short-sighted effort to save a relatively small amount of money. I was a sharp and vocal critic of those closings. We also cannot continue to have a shortage of law enforcement personnel. The current Mayor promised to hire 1,000 new police officers when he first ran. Eight years later, we still have not done that. I voted “No” on six of eight budgets while I was in the City Council largely because they did not provide enough resources for law enforcement. Finally, as Mayor, I would seek to open a new crime lab to reduce the unacceptable backlog of unsolved cases. One reason for the low clearance rate of violent crimes is that law enforcement is forced to wait months for evidence to come back from the state crime lab. Other large cities have their own crime labs. In partnership with other law enforcement agencies in the Chicago area, so should we.

Education and Schools

What is the appropriate role of charter schools within the Chicago Public Schools system?

Charter schools have a role to play in that parents who are unhappy with their educational choices should have an opportunity to choose a different school for their children. I support, however, the current recommendation for a moratorium on new charter school applications until at least a new Mayor has been chosen and a comprehensive education strategy can be implemented.

Should the Chicago Board of Education be solely appointed by the mayor, as is now the case? Or should Chicago switch to an elected school board or some hybrid?

Chicago voters are overwhelmingly for an elected school board. So am I. I am for a hybrid school board, with some members elected, and some appointed. Chicago is the only school district in Illinois where the voters have no say on who sits on the school board. At the same time, the Mayor needs to retain some accountability to counterbalance what would likely be a school board dominated by special interests.

What else would I do as mayor to improve the quality of public school education?

As with solving crime, this is a complex issue with many moving parts. We need to continue the trend to allow principals to have more influence in hiring teachers and running their school. Each school in Chicago is unique and should be treated as such. We need to launch a campaign to try to lure more young people-particularly people of color-into the teaching profession. The number of African-American teachers continues to fall. Students deserve to be taught by a diverse staff.

Not everyone wants to or even should attend college. Chicago Public Schools must do a better job of preparing students to survive in a job market without a college education. Greater emphasis on teaching students about trades and other professions that do not require a college degree is needed.

Greater emphasis needs to be given to encourage parents to get involved in their children’s education. Initiatives such as parent engagement centers, parent support centers, parent university, parent board of governors, community action councils, as well as many faith-based initiatives need to be enhanced and expanded. Local School Councils also need to be upgraded.

Chicago Public Schools have shown an overall increase in graduation rates and the percentage of students enrolling in college, but there is much more work to be done. Thirteen fewer Chicago schools made received the highest possible rating of Level-1 plus than last year. Fully twenty percent of Chicago schools received the lowest ratings. This means that nearly 75,000 students are daily in schools that fail them.

Our goal must be to provide all children in Chicago with access to a world-class education in every community, so they can graduate from high school ready for college and a good career. Unfortunately we are nowhere near meeting that goal.

As always funding is a concern. Class sizes are still too large. Some schools are forced to choose between a librarian and a nurse. While state funding has improved over the past few years, Chicago must still continue the fight to get equitable funding from Springfield as opposed to the rest of the state.

Most importantly, every school in the city needs to be on an equal footing with every other one. Schools and their students on the south and west sides can no longer be treated as second class citizens. As Mayor, I will make it a priority to pursue excellent schools in every part of the city.

Immigration

Chicago, by ordinance, is an official "welcoming city." This means the Chicago police are generally prohibited from detaining undocumented immigrants on behalf of federal immigration authorities.

I am not for Chicago police doing the work of ICE agents. As a long-time civil rights attorney, I support the current policy that unless there is a valid warrant to hold detainees, it is a violation of that person’s civil rights to detain them.

Environment

What are the top three environmental concerns facing the next mayor of Chicago?

The number one environmental concern in Chicago has to be brain damaging lead found in the tap water in Chicago homes, schools, parks and businesses and the effort to downplay or cover up its discovery by the current Administration. The city has failed residents of the Southeast Side of Chicago which has a lingering problem with soot, or manganese, which is also brain-damaging and also creates a myriad of breathing and lung problems. Another huge concern is the ongoing effort to keep the devastating Asian carp out of Lake Michigan.

Building Bridges

As a Civil Rights attorney who has always supported law enforcement (these are not mutually exclusive), I am the only candidate for Mayor who has credibility with all stakeholders in the efforts to reduce violent crime and help re-build the trust between the Chicago Police Department and communities on the South and West side who sometimes feel law enforcement is not always on their side. In my last race, for County Board President, I was endorsed both by Black Lives Matter and every law enforcement group in Cook County. This is because they know that when it comes to law enforcement, I can bring everyone together.

PROPERTY TAXES

As mayor, I will not raise the city’s portion of property taxes during the first term.

What does this promise mean, exactly?

The city had a property tax levy in 2017 of $1,358 billion. In future years, under a Fioretti Administration, that number will not change.

How does this affect your taxes?

The City of Chicago represents about 25 percent of the tax bill that property owners receive from the Cook County Treasurer. The Chicago Board of Education, Park District, Community College District and Cook County also collect property taxes. While these government bodies are independent of the City of Chicago’s budget, the Mayor makes appointments to each. My appointments to these boards will share his view that homeowners are not ATM machines. ​

Other factors play a role in a homeowner’s property taxes, including re-assessments from the Cook County Assessor’s office or an increase in the levy from other government bodies. I would have no control over those. In the area that he will have control over, the amount of property taxes paid as a share of City of Chicago’s property tax levy, that number will be frozen.

A “property tax freeze” is a political gimmick for some politicians. What Chicagoans really want is a mayor who is personally committed to not raising property taxes. Unlike other candidates in the Mayor’s race, I actually have a record of opposing property tax increases. As Alderman, I was one of a handful of Alderman who voted ‘No” on Rahm Emanuel’s record $544 million property tax increase. To me, it is a matter of principle. As Mayor, I will continue his commitment to protect Chicago homeowners.

TRUE TIF REFORM

Chicago is overrun by TIFs – tax increment finance districts – which drain property taxes from essential services such as schools, parks and social services, often with the money subsidizing private developers. TIFs were originally designed to improve blighted areas by attracting construction and jobs, but they have turned into a slush fund for the Mayor.

TIFs exploded in the 1990s and 2000s to claim more than $6 billion from city property taxes. In 2017, Chicago had at least 143 TIFs covering one-third of the city that devour $660 million each year that should pay to educate our children and for the care of our most fragile citizens.

Our central business district is hardly blighted. Yet, the Loop, Near North Side, Near South Side and Near West Side have taken nearly $1.28 billion of the $2.25 billion in TIF dollars spent from 2014 to 2017. Only $4.8 million was spent collectively in Pullman, Riverdale, Roseland and West Pullman, far South Side communities where blight is prevalent and economic development scarce. In addition, according to reports, tens of millions of TIF dollars in disadvantaged TIF districts are routinely “ported” to other districts. This is unacceptable.

The TIF process is fundamentally broken, which is why I will call for an immediate moratorium on any new TIFs.

If we freeze the TIF program, it will allow us time to conduct a complete audit to find out exactly where our money has gone and what the benefits are. This audit should be done by a completely independent body and be made public, giving independent experts, media and the people of Chicago the ability to weigh in on the best uses of this money.

Mayor Rahm Emanuel promised his administration would be “more accountable, open, and transparent” than any other administration. The TIF Data Portal on the City’s website, while a beginning, falls far short of anything most people would call transparency. Independent research has shown millions in unaccounted for money, and the Department of Planning has not answered demands to account for these dollars. I will call for a complete overhaul of the system to ensure true transparency.

Meanwhile, estimates say the City may currently have $1.4 to $1.7 billion in unused TIF funds. I will declare a TIF surplus with the vast sum that is not committed to any specific projects or debt. That money could then be used to reopen our mental health clinics, shore up some of our school budgets, make a payment into our beleaguered pension fund, turn some of the closed schools into community centers that drive economic development and begin meaningful neighborhood economic development programs.

I would support the use of TIF funds with local support to assist in creating development and jobs in our communities. Thoughtful development can put vacant properties and parcels back on the property tax rolls, simultaneously generating tax revenue, creating jobs and fostering safe streets and strong neighborhoods.

The first step in addressing our city’s financial crisis is to use TIF money for its original purpose: lifting our least-developed neighborhoods out of blight and poverty to create opportunities across all of our communities.[13]

—Bob Fioretti's 2019 campaign website[14]

Fioretti's website highlighted the following campaign themes:[15]

Public Safety

Saving Our Schools

Economic Agenda

End the Assault on the Middle Class